Crown Legacy vs Chicago Fire II: match statistics
Crown Legacy vs Chicago Fire II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Crown Legacy played Chicago Fire II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Crown Legacy: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Chicago Fire II: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Crown Legacy scores 2.41 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Chicago Fire II scores 1.53 and concedes 1.47. League average: 3.24 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Crown Legacy 59%, Chicago Fire II 65%. Over 2.5: Crown Legacy 71%, Chicago Fire II 82%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Crown Legacy has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.49. Crown Legacy: 14.1 shots per match, Chicago Fire II: 12.4.
Match halves
Crown Legacy: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.12. Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Crown Legacy: 0-15 (9 goals). Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.24 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Crown Legacy enjoys a clear home advantage: at home they average 2.22 goals scored and 0.89 conceded per match, a 67% home win rate and a home goal difference of +12. Chicago Fire II away average 1.11 goals scored and 1.67 conceded, just an 11% away win rate and a negative goal difference of -5, which limits their effectiveness on the road. Crown register more shots (15.33 vs 11.89), more shots on target (4.89 vs 4.22) and a higher finishing rate (14% vs 9%), while the home side’s average xG at home is 1.66 versus 1.39 for the visitors, indicating better quality of chances created. It should be noted, however, that Chicago have scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches and average 2.2 points per game in that period, whereas Crown have scored 5 goals and average 1.0 point per game, which highlights the visitors’ good form. Considering the home statistical advantages (56% clean sheets for Crown vs 11% for Chicago, a lower average goals conceded 0.89 vs 1.67 and a more favourable xG against 1.23 vs 1.51), I expect a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'both teams to score' scenario is more likely, as Chicago Fire II has a seasonal BTTS of 78% and 80% in the last 5 matches, averaging 2.4 goals scored in those five games. Crown Legacy has a seasonal BTTS of 50% (last 5: 40%), but averages 2.0 goals per season and generates 1.61 xG per match with a 15% shot conversion rate, indicating a real chance for the hosts to score. Both teams also concede chances – Crown concedes 1.25 goals for the season (1.8 in the last 5), and Chicago concedes 1.67 for the season (1.2 in the last 5), with xG against of 1.42 and 1.51 respectively. Additionally, the league has a BTTS of 61% and an average of 3.24 goals per match, with home matches over 2.5 goals in 88% of cases and away matches in 78%, which reinforces the signal for mutual scoring. Based on this, I tip BTTS 'Yes' with a probability of 75% vs 25%, because the visitor's high seasonal BTTS and the hosts' solid xG and created chances form the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model predicts 1.56 xG for Crown Legacy and 1.41 xG for Chicago Fire II, totaling 2.97 expected goals. Seasonal metrics confirm a propensity for goals: Crown has Over 2.5 in 88% of home matches, Chicago has Over 2.5 in 78% of fixtures, and the league averages 3.24 goals per game. In the last 5 matches Chicago hit Over 2.5 in 100% of cases (Crown 40%), while BTTS stands at 50% for Crown and 78% for Chicago, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Crown averages 13 shots with a 15% conversion rate (seasonal 2.0 goals), Chicago averages 11.89 shots with a 9% conversion rate (1.11 goals), which together support an Over 2.5 forecast. Based on these figures the strongest signal is Over 2.5 (I estimate ~78% probability), with Over 1.5 virtually certain (~94%), and Over 3.5 looking weaker (~36%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Crown Legacy is the clear favorite: the hosts lead at the break in 63% of home matches, scoring on average 1.25 goals by half-time and conceding 0.5, while also winning 63% of home games. Chicago Fire II score only 0.56 goals by half-time and lead at the break in 22% of matches, but they have a high proportion of games with both teams scoring (78%), which increases the risk of an away goal after the break. Additionally, the visitors have scored 5 goals in the 46–60 minute window this season, so there is a real chance of a turnaround after half-time, hence the significant value of the 1/X scenario. The most convincing signals favor the home side: higher xG 1.61 versus 1.39, better shot conversion 15% versus 9%, and a higher average points at home 2.0 versus 0.78, therefore my preferred HT/FT pick is 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Crown Legacy | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chicago Fire II is 120% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Crown Legacy · 2.2 pts / match - Chicago Fire II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Crown Legacy is 58% better for: goals scored per match.
2.41 goals / match - Crown Legacy · 1.53 goals / match - Chicago Fire II
Crown Legacy scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).
Chicago Fire II scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Crown Legacy keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Crown Legacy
Over / Under - Chicago Fire II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Crown Legacy - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chicago Fire II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 35%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Crown Legacy
Chicago Fire II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Crown Legacy | Liga | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.88 | 3.24 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 59% | 62% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 66% | ▲ 82% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 21% | ▲ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 75% | • 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 84% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Crown Legacy 0 - 1 - 1 Chicago Fire II. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Crown Legacy vs Chicago Fire II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Crown Legacy 3:2 Chicago Fire II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Crown Legacy and Chicago Fire II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Crown Legacy won 0, Chicago Fire II won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Crown Legacy vs Chicago Fire II?
Crown Legacy score 2.41 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire II 1.53. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Crown Legacy's matches and 65% of Chicago Fire II's.
What form are Crown Legacy and Chicago Fire II in?
Over the last 5 games Crown Legacy have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Chicago Fire II 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Crown Legacy vs Chicago Fire II?
The statistical background for Crown Legacy vs Chicago Fire II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


