Algeria - Ligue 1Data current as of 06 September 2026

CS Constantine vs MC Alger: match statistics

CS Constantine crest
CS Constantine
2 : 0half-time 0:0
MC Alger crest
MC Alger

CS Constantine vs MC Alger: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CS Constantine played MC Alger in Ligue 1 (Algeria). The match was played on 16 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

CS Constantine: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. MC Alger: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CS Constantine scores 1.04 and concedes 0.77 goals per match. MC Alger scores 1.38 and concedes 0.46. League average: 2.16 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CS Constantine 35%, MC Alger 29%. Over 2.5: CS Constantine 27%, MC Alger 33%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

MC Alger has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.24. CS Constantine: 8.0 shots per match, MC Alger: 10.4.

Match halves

CS Constantine: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.65. MC Alger: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

CS Constantine: 76-90+ (10 goals). MC Alger: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 1: 2.16 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win (2): MC Alger are the leaders and clearly in better form – over the last 5 matches they scored 8 goals, won 4 times and averaged 2.4 points per game, while CS Constantine managed only 2 goals in that period, failed to win (0-3-2) and averaged 0.6 points per game. Constantine’s home record shows they can create chances: on average 11.08 shots and 5.62 shots on target per match with xG 1.64 at home, but their shot efficiency is only 11% and recently it has not translated into goals. The visitors, despite fewer shots (8.42 of which 4.5 on target) away, are more efficient – a 14% conversion and xG 1.33 resulted in 8 goals in five matches. Defensively the teams are similar: Constantine concedes 0.54 goals per game at home with xG against 1.01, while MC Alger concedes 0.5 goals away with xG against 1.02, but the visitors have a higher clean sheet rate (67% vs 54%). Considering the hosts’ poor run, MC Alger’s efficiency and form, and the leaders’ psychological edge, I assess the probabilities as: home 25%, draw 25%, away 50%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back No BTTS because both teams show strong defensive profiles: CS Constantine has a 67% clean sheet rate and MC Alger also 67%, while seasonal rates of matches with both teams scoring are only 33% and 25% respectively. Seasonal goals averages reinforce this — Constantine scores 1.58 and concedes 0.42 per match, MC Alger scores 1.17 and concedes 0.5; such low concession averages (0.42 and 0.5) reduce the likelihood of a Goal/Goal outcome. In the last 5 matches Constantine scored 2 goals (0.4 per game) and had BTTS in 20% of games, whereas MC Alger scored 8 goals (1.6 per game) and had BTTS in 40% — yielding roughly a 30% BTTS signal from current form, below the league average of 47%. Although xG slightly favors Constantine (xG 1.6 vs 1.33 for MC Alger) and the home side registers more shots (12.33 with 5.67 on target vs 8.42 with 4.5 on target), the defensive edge and low seasonal BTTS rates (33%/25%) are stronger indicators, so I assess No BTTS as the more likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Using expected goals as the average of team attack and opponent defense: home xG 1.60 versus away conceded 1.02 yields 1.31 expected goals for CS Constantine, while away xG 1.33 versus home conceded 0.88 yields 1.11 for MC Alger, totaling 2.42. With this total of 2.42, a Poisson distribution gives roughly a 70% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 44% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and about 22% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). Season-long metrics confirm a moderate scoring tendency: home team Over1.5 in 50% of matches and Over2.5 in 42%, away 42% and 25%, alongside high Over0.5 92% vs 83% and low BTTS 33% and 25%. Homes average 12.33 shots and 5.67 on target with a 13% conversion, away 8.42 shots and 4.5 on target with a 14% conversion, which further supports the case for at least 2 goals in the match. Conclusion: the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (line 1.5, side "over") with an estimated ~70% probability; Over2.5 and Over3.5 are significantly less certain (44% and 22%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time I expect a draw: the home side drew at the break in 7 matches (58%), and the visitors in 8 matches (67%), indicating a high proportion of draws in the first 45 minutes. In the second half the advantage should belong to CS Constantine — they average 0.92 goals after the break and win the second half in 57% of cases, while MC Alger average 0.67 second-half goals and win only 25% of second halves. Seasonally the home team also has superior offensive and quality metrics: 1.58 goals per match versus 1.17 for the visitors, xG 1.60 vs 1.33, and more shots (12.33 vs 8.42) and shots on target (5.67 vs 4.5), which increases the chance of a turnaround in the second half. It should be noted that the visitors have been in good form recently — 80% wins in the last 5 matches and they led at half-time in 60% of those games — which reduces the likelihood of the home side taking an easy lead from the start. Summing the above figures, the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a home win after 90 minutes (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
CS ConstantineMC Alger
13Shots11
CS ConstantineMC Alger
3Shots on target4
CS ConstantineMC Alger
1.4xG1.3
CS ConstantineMC Alger
4Corners2
CS ConstantineMC Alger
51Dangerous attacks45
CS ConstantineMC Alger
-1Fouls-1
CS ConstantineMC Alger
2Cards3
CS ConstantineMC Alger

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CS ConstantineMC Alger
1.04Goals scored / match1.38
CS ConstantineMC Alger
0.77Goals conceded / match0.46
CS ConstantineMC Alger
54%Average possession54%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
3.81Shots on target / match5.08
CS ConstantineMC Alger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8Shots per match10.38
CS ConstantineMC Alger
3.81Shots on target5.08
CS ConstantineMC Alger
13%Shot conversion13.3%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
54%Possession54%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
1.24xG for1.48
CS ConstantineMC Alger
1.07xG against0.94
CS ConstantineMC Alger

Shooting quality

CS Constantine: Efficient finishingMC Alger: Efficient finishing
CS ConstantineMC Alger
Accuracy (shots on target)48%49%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MC Alger is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - CS Constantine · 2.4 pts / match - MC Alger

CS Constantine
DDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
38% W35% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-7
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
MC Alger
WWWLW
Season result split
71% W17% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-4-3
2.29 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MC Alger is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.04 goals / match - CS Constantine · 1.38 goals / match - MC Alger

MC Alger is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.77 goals / match - CS Constantine · 0.46 goals / match - MC Alger

CS Constantine scoring profile: more difficult

CS Constantine scores in 62% of matches (16 of 26 matches), while MC Alger keeps a clean sheet in 67% (16 of 24 matches).

MC Alger scoring profile: strong

MC Alger scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while CS Constantine keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 matches).

27Goals scored (season)33
CS ConstantineMC Alger
20Goals conceded (season)11
CS ConstantineMC Alger
1.81Average goals in match1.83
CS ConstantineMC Alger
2Goals scored (last 5)8
CS ConstantineMC Alger
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
CS ConstantineMC Alger

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal83%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
42%2 goals33%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
0%3 goals13%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
0%4 goals4%
CS ConstantineMC Alger

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal33%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
19%2 goals13%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
0%3 goals0%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
0%4 goals0%
CS ConstantineMC Alger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time17%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
4%BTTS in both halves4%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
27%Scored in both halves13%
CS ConstantineMC Alger

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
20%BTTS - last 540%
CS ConstantineMC Alger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
CS ConstantineMC Alger

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
CS ConstantineMC Alger

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MC Alger is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / match - CS Constantine · 1.5 pts / match - MC Alger

CS Constantine - half-time state
31% leading50% draw19% trailing
MC Alger - half-time state
29% leading63% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per match (1st half)1.5
CS ConstantineMC Alger
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.58
CS ConstantineMC Alger
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
CS ConstantineMC Alger
0.65Average goals (1st half)0.83
CS ConstantineMC Alger
73%Clean sheet before half-time75%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
62%No goal before half-time58%
CS ConstantineMC Alger

After half-time (2nd half)

1.46Points per match (2nd half)1.75
CS ConstantineMC Alger
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
CS ConstantineMC Alger
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.21
CS ConstantineMC Alger
1.15Average goals (2nd half)1
CS ConstantineMC Alger
54%Clean sheet after half-time79%
CS ConstantineMC Alger
50%No goal after half-time46%
CS ConstantineMC Alger

CS Constantine - second-half results

35% W42% R23% P
37
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MC Alger - second-half results

42% W50% R8% P
36
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding245%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CS Constantine - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.40
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%20%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
MC Alger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.60.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CS Constantine
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
2
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
10
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

MC Alger
ScoredConceded
6
0
0-15
4
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
6
0
46-60
5
1
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CS Constantine

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

MC Alger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
36%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).

Teams vs league

CS ConstantineLigaMC Alger
Average goals in match 1.812.16 1.83
Both teams scored 35%47% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%36% 33%
Clean sheets 42%31% 67%
Goal before half-time 58%62% 50%
Goal after half-time 73%71% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.16
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
0.89
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CS ConstantineYellow cardAbdelmoumen Chikhi
  2. MC AlgerYellow cardMerwane Khelif
  3. MC AlgerYellow cardAyoub Ghezala
  4. CS ConstantineGoalTosin OmoleyeAssist: Zakaria Bouhalfaya
  5. MC AlgerGoalAlhassane Bangoura
  6. CS ConstantineSubstitutionOn: Ghiles GuenaouiOff: Aimen Abdelaziz Lahmeri
  7. CS ConstantineYellow cardTosin Omoleye
  8. CS ConstantineSubstitutionOn: Louai Abdelmountakem Bouacida.Off: Mohamed Benchaira
  9. MC AlgerYellow cardOussama Benhaoua

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CS Constantine 0 - 0 - 1 MC Alger. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CS Constantine vs MC Alger?

The Ligue 1 match finished CS Constantine 2:0 MC Alger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CS Constantine vs MC Alger?

CS Constantine score 1.04 goals per game on average and MC Alger 1.38. The Ligue 1 average is 2.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 35% of CS Constantine's matches and 29% of MC Alger's.

What form are CS Constantine and MC Alger in?

Over the last 5 games CS Constantine have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and MC Alger 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CS Constantine vs MC Alger?

The statistical background for CS Constantine vs MC Alger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.