CS Constantine vs MC Alger: match statistics
CS Constantine vs MC Alger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CS Constantine played MC Alger in Ligue 1 (Algeria). The match was played on 16 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
CS Constantine: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. MC Alger: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
CS Constantine scores 1.04 and concedes 0.77 goals per match. MC Alger scores 1.38 and concedes 0.46. League average: 2.16 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CS Constantine 35%, MC Alger 29%. Over 2.5: CS Constantine 27%, MC Alger 33%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 36%.
xG, shots and style
MC Alger has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.24. CS Constantine: 8.0 shots per match, MC Alger: 10.4.
Match halves
CS Constantine: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.65. MC Alger: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
CS Constantine: 76-90+ (10 goals). MC Alger: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligue 1: 2.16 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 36%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win (2): MC Alger are the leaders and clearly in better form – over the last 5 matches they scored 8 goals, won 4 times and averaged 2.4 points per game, while CS Constantine managed only 2 goals in that period, failed to win (0-3-2) and averaged 0.6 points per game. Constantine’s home record shows they can create chances: on average 11.08 shots and 5.62 shots on target per match with xG 1.64 at home, but their shot efficiency is only 11% and recently it has not translated into goals. The visitors, despite fewer shots (8.42 of which 4.5 on target) away, are more efficient – a 14% conversion and xG 1.33 resulted in 8 goals in five matches. Defensively the teams are similar: Constantine concedes 0.54 goals per game at home with xG against 1.01, while MC Alger concedes 0.5 goals away with xG against 1.02, but the visitors have a higher clean sheet rate (67% vs 54%). Considering the hosts’ poor run, MC Alger’s efficiency and form, and the leaders’ psychological edge, I assess the probabilities as: home 25%, draw 25%, away 50%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back No BTTS because both teams show strong defensive profiles: CS Constantine has a 67% clean sheet rate and MC Alger also 67%, while seasonal rates of matches with both teams scoring are only 33% and 25% respectively. Seasonal goals averages reinforce this — Constantine scores 1.58 and concedes 0.42 per match, MC Alger scores 1.17 and concedes 0.5; such low concession averages (0.42 and 0.5) reduce the likelihood of a Goal/Goal outcome. In the last 5 matches Constantine scored 2 goals (0.4 per game) and had BTTS in 20% of games, whereas MC Alger scored 8 goals (1.6 per game) and had BTTS in 40% — yielding roughly a 30% BTTS signal from current form, below the league average of 47%. Although xG slightly favors Constantine (xG 1.6 vs 1.33 for MC Alger) and the home side registers more shots (12.33 with 5.67 on target vs 8.42 with 4.5 on target), the defensive edge and low seasonal BTTS rates (33%/25%) are stronger indicators, so I assess No BTTS as the more likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Using expected goals as the average of team attack and opponent defense: home xG 1.60 versus away conceded 1.02 yields 1.31 expected goals for CS Constantine, while away xG 1.33 versus home conceded 0.88 yields 1.11 for MC Alger, totaling 2.42. With this total of 2.42, a Poisson distribution gives roughly a 70% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 44% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and about 22% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). Season-long metrics confirm a moderate scoring tendency: home team Over1.5 in 50% of matches and Over2.5 in 42%, away 42% and 25%, alongside high Over0.5 92% vs 83% and low BTTS 33% and 25%. Homes average 12.33 shots and 5.67 on target with a 13% conversion, away 8.42 shots and 4.5 on target with a 14% conversion, which further supports the case for at least 2 goals in the match. Conclusion: the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (line 1.5, side "over") with an estimated ~70% probability; Over2.5 and Over3.5 are significantly less certain (44% and 22%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time I expect a draw: the home side drew at the break in 7 matches (58%), and the visitors in 8 matches (67%), indicating a high proportion of draws in the first 45 minutes. In the second half the advantage should belong to CS Constantine — they average 0.92 goals after the break and win the second half in 57% of cases, while MC Alger average 0.67 second-half goals and win only 25% of second halves. Seasonally the home team also has superior offensive and quality metrics: 1.58 goals per match versus 1.17 for the visitors, xG 1.60 vs 1.33, and more shots (12.33 vs 8.42) and shots on target (5.67 vs 4.5), which increases the chance of a turnaround in the second half. It should be noted that the visitors have been in good form recently — 80% wins in the last 5 matches and they led at half-time in 60% of those games — which reduces the likelihood of the home side taking an easy lead from the start. Summing the above figures, the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a home win after 90 minutes (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CS Constantine | MC Alger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
MC Alger is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - CS Constantine · 2.4 pts / match - MC Alger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
MC Alger is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1.04 goals / match - CS Constantine · 1.38 goals / match - MC Alger
MC Alger is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.77 goals / match - CS Constantine · 0.46 goals / match - MC Alger
CS Constantine scores in 62% of matches (16 of 26 matches), while MC Alger keeps a clean sheet in 67% (16 of 24 matches).
MC Alger scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while CS Constantine keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CS Constantine
Over / Under - MC Alger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
MC Alger is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / match - CS Constantine · 1.5 pts / match - MC Alger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CS Constantine - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
MC Alger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CS Constantine
MC Alger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).
Teams vs league
| CS Constantine | Liga | MC Alger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.81 | 2.16 | ▼ 1.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 35% | 47% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 27% | 36% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 31% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 62% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 73% | 71% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CS Constantine 0 - 0 - 1 MC Alger. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CS Constantine vs MC Alger?
The Ligue 1 match finished CS Constantine 2:0 MC Alger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CS Constantine vs MC Alger?
CS Constantine score 1.04 goals per game on average and MC Alger 1.38. The Ligue 1 average is 2.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 35% of CS Constantine's matches and 29% of MC Alger's.
What form are CS Constantine and MC Alger in?
Over the last 5 games CS Constantine have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and MC Alger 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CS Constantine vs MC Alger?
The statistical background for CS Constantine vs MC Alger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


