CSA Steaua Bucureşti vs Chindia Târgovişte: match statistics
CSA Steaua Bucureşti vs Chindia Târgovişte: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CSA Steaua Bucureşti played Chindia Târgovişte in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 2 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
CSA Steaua Bucureşti: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Chindia Târgovişte: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
CSA Steaua Bucureşti scores 1.64 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. Chindia Târgovişte scores 1.68 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CSA Steaua Bucureşti 59%, Chindia Târgovişte 45%. Over 2.5: CSA Steaua Bucureşti 59%, Chindia Târgovişte 45%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
CSA Steaua Bucureşti has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.52. CSA Steaua Bucureşti: 12.9 shots per match, Chindia Târgovişte: 11.9.
Match halves
CSA Steaua Bucureşti: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.91. Chindia Târgovişte: half-time lead 59%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
CSA Steaua Bucureşti: 76-90+ (9 goals). Chindia Târgovişte: 16-30 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga II: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CSA Steaua has a clear advantage in home metrics: they win 80% of home matches, score an average of 2.2 goals per home game, register 5.7 shots on target and record an average xG of 1.92 per match. Chindia’s away numbers are weaker: on average 1.27 goals scored, 4.45 shots on target, shot accuracy 12% and 27% of away matches without scoring. Defensively Steaua concedes 1.2 goals per home match with a home goal difference of +10, while Chindia concedes 1.45 goals away and has a negative away goal difference of -2. Both teams have similar recent form (3 wins and 2 losses in the last 5, averaging 1.8 points per game), but Chindia conceded as many as 10 goals in their last 5 matches versus 5 conceded by Steaua, indicating a weakness in the visitors’ defense. Considering the higher home xG (1.92 vs 1.45), Steaua’s better shot conversion (15% vs 12%), lower share of matches without a goal (10% vs 27%) and greater shot volume (14.4 vs 10.91), I predict a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are mixed: Steaua has BTTS at 36% at home, Chindia 55% overall, yielding a simple average of ~46% which suggests a moderate chance of both teams. In terms of chance creation both teams have xG > 1.4 — Steaua xG for 1.59 vs xG against 1.58, Chindia xG for 1.45 vs xG against 1.43 — indicating they can generate opportunities. Against BTTS, the home defense is a major factor: Steaua concedes only 0.91 goals season-to-date and has 55% clean sheets, with a 57% clean sheet rate in the league, which strongly limits the probability of the visitors scoring. Additionally Steaua averages more goals per season (2.09) than Chindia (1.27), and in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 6 and conceded 5 while Chindia scored 9 and conceded 10, showing visitors tend to both score and concede more, but not necessarily both teams scoring in the same match. Considering the dominant clean sheet signal from the hosts and the seasonal BTTS average of ~46%, I assess BTTS probability at 42% (Yes) and 58% (No), therefore I recommend the 'No' option.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and statistics I expect about 1.59 goals for CSA (xG_for_home 1.59 vs xG_against_away 1.58 → avg ~1.59) and 1.44 for Chindia (xG_for_away 1.45 vs xG_against_home 1.43 → ~1.44), totaling ~3.03 goals. Home side score on average 2.09 goals per match and have 17% shot conversion versus the visitors' 12%, while the away team average 1.27 goals, which increases the likelihood of a goals-heavy game. Seasonal Over 1.5 rates are 91% for hosts and 64% for guests, and a Poisson distribution for λ=3.03 yields roughly an 81% chance of over 1.5, making this the strongest signal. The 2.5 line offers a moderate edge for the over (seasonal 55%/36% home/away and model ~58% for Over 2.5), whereas 3.5 has low value (~36% over), so I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the best play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back HT/FT 1/1: hosts CSA Steaua led at the break in 8 matches (73%) and average 1.27 first-half goals versus Chindia’s 0.82, giving them a clear advantage after 45 minutes. Seasonal averages confirm the hosts’ dominance — CSA score 2.09 goals per match and concede 0.91, while Chindia score 1.27 and concede 1.45, so the hosts are stronger both offensively and defensively. xG and shot data reinforce this picture: CSA have xG_for 1.59 vs 1.45 for the visitors, xG_against 1.43 vs 1.58, and average 12.64 shots (4.64 on target) vs Chindia’s 10.91 (4.45 on target) with conversion rates of 17% vs 12%. Additionally, the hosts have HTPoints 26 vs 18, HTPPG 2.36 vs 1.64 and lead at the break more often (73% vs 45%), which increases the probability of maintaining the lead to full-time. There is a risk of a turnaround, as in the last 5 matches the visitors scored an average of 1.6 goals in second halves vs 0.6 for the hosts, so the probability distribution also accounts for equalizing and comeback scenarios.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CSA Steaua Bucureşti | Chindia Târgovişte | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chindia Târgovişte is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.27 goals / match - CSA Steaua Bucureşti · 1.18 goals / match - Chindia Târgovişte
CSA Steaua Bucureşti scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while Chindia Târgovişte keeps a clean sheet in 41% (9 of 22 matches).
Chindia Târgovişte scores in 82% of matches (18 of 22 matches), while CSA Steaua Bucureşti keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CSA Steaua Bucureşti
Over / Under - Chindia Târgovişte
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chindia Târgovişte is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / match - CSA Steaua Bucureşti · 2 pts / match - Chindia Târgovişte
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CSA Steaua Bucureşti - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chindia Târgovişte - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 59% of matches and wins 50%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CSA Steaua Bucureşti
Chindia Târgovişte
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| CSA Steaua Bucureşti | Liga | Chindia Târgovişte | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.91 | 2.73 | ▲ 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 50% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 59% | 50% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 29% | ▲ 41% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 74% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 81% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CSA Steaua Bucureşti 0 - 0 - 1 Chindia Târgovişte. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CSA Steaua Bucureşti vs Chindia Târgovişte?
The Liga II match finished CSA Steaua Bucureşti 2:0 Chindia Târgovişte. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CSA Steaua Bucureşti vs Chindia Târgovişte?
CSA Steaua Bucureşti score 1.64 goals per game on average and Chindia Târgovişte 1.68. The Liga II average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 59% of CSA Steaua Bucureşti's matches and 45% of Chindia Târgovişte's.
What form are CSA Steaua Bucureşti and Chindia Târgovişte in?
Over the last 5 games CSA Steaua Bucureşti have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Chindia Târgovişte 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CSA Steaua Bucureşti vs Chindia Târgovişte?
The statistical background for CSA Steaua Bucureşti vs Chindia Târgovişte — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


