Hungary - NB IIData current as of 22 July 2026

Csákvári TK vs Videoton: match statistics

Csákvári TK crest
Csákvári TK
1 : 5half-time 1:3
Videoton crest
Videoton
155%(2.20)
X30%(3.30)
215%(2.80)

Csákvári TK displays solid home form with a 63% win rate and only a 0% loss rate at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.75 goals per home match, conceding just 0.75, giving them a positive goal difference of +8. Videoton, on the other hand, has not won any away match this season (0% win rate), conceding an average of 1.88 goals on the road while scoring only 0.88. The visitors' poor form in their last five matches and a negative goal difference of -8 away from home speak in favor of the hosts. Csákvári TK's advantage in home efficiency and defensive stability makes them the favorite in this encounter, although their recent overall form is not impressive, which could open the door for a draw.

Csákvári TK vs Videoton: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Csákvári TK play Videoton in NB II (Hungary). The match date is 15 February 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:5.

Current form

Csákvári TK: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Videoton: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Csákvári TK scores 1.43 and concedes 1.23 goals per match. Videoton scores 1.23 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Csákvári TK 57%, Videoton 47%. Over 2.5: Csákvári TK 47%, Videoton 37%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Csákvári TK has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.38. Csákvári TK: 11.5 shots per match, Videoton: 9.9.

Match halves

Csákvári TK: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73. Videoton: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Csákvári TK: 0-15 (10 goals). Videoton: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB II: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Csákvári TK displays solid home form with a 63% win rate and only a 0% loss rate at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.75 goals per home match, conceding just 0.75, giving them a positive goal difference of +8. Videoton, on the other hand, has not won any away match this season (0% win rate), conceding an average of 1.88 goals on the road while scoring only 0.88. The visitors' poor form in their last five matches and a negative goal difference of -8 away from home speak in favor of the hosts. Csákvári TK's advantage in home efficiency and defensive stability makes them the favorite in this encounter, although their recent overall form is not impressive, which could open the door for a draw.

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Csákvári TKVideoton
16Shots12
Csákvári TKVideoton
6Shots on target7
Csákvári TKVideoton
1.65xG1.45
Csákvári TKVideoton
5Corners10
Csákvári TKVideoton
31Dangerous attacks28
Csákvári TKVideoton
10Fouls15
Csákvári TKVideoton
2Cards3
Csákvári TKVideoton

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Csákvári TKVideoton
1.43Goals scored / match1.23
Csákvári TKVideoton
1.23Goals conceded / match1.1
Csákvári TKVideoton
46%Average possession45%
Csákvári TKVideoton
3.97Shots on target / match3.4
Csákvári TKVideoton

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.53Shots per match9.93
Csákvári TKVideoton
3.97Shots on target3.4
Csákvári TKVideoton
12.4%Shot conversion12.4%
Csákvári TKVideoton
46%Possession45%
Csákvári TKVideoton
1.47xG for1.38
Csákvári TKVideoton
1.57xG against1.42
Csákvári TKVideoton

Shooting quality

Csákvári TK: Counter-attackingVideoton: Counter-attacking
Csákvári TKVideoton
Accuracy (shots on target)34%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Csákvári TK is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Csákvári TK · 0.6 pts / match - Videoton

Csákvári TK
WLLWW
Season result split
40% W33% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-8
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Videoton
WLLLL
Season result split
33% W30% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-11
1.30 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Csákvári TK is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.43 goals / match - Csákvári TK · 1.23 goals / match - Videoton

Videoton is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.23 goals / match - Csákvári TK · 1.1 goals / match - Videoton

Csákvári TK scoring profile: strong

Csákvári TK scores in 77% of matches (23 of 30 matches), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

Videoton scoring profile: very strong

Videoton scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Csákvári TK keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).

43Goals scored (season)37
Csákvári TKVideoton
37Goals conceded (season)33
Csákvári TKVideoton
2.67Average goals in match2.33
Csákvári TKVideoton
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Csákvári TKVideoton
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
Csákvári TKVideoton

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal73%
Csákvári TKVideoton
43%2 goals27%
Csákvári TKVideoton
10%3 goals10%
Csákvári TKVideoton
7%4 goals7%
Csákvári TKVideoton

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal67%
Csákvári TKVideoton
37%2 goals30%
Csákvári TKVideoton
7%3 goals13%
Csákvári TKVideoton
3%4 goals0%
Csákvári TKVideoton

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time17%
Csákvári TKVideoton
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Csákvári TKVideoton
27%Scored in both halves23%
Csákvári TKVideoton

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
Csákvári TKVideoton
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Csákvári TKVideoton
20%BTTS - last 540%
Csákvári TKVideoton

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Csákvári TKVideoton
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Csákvári TKVideoton
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Csákvári TKVideoton

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Csákvári TKVideoton
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Csákvári TKVideoton
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Csákvári TKVideoton

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Videoton is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Csákvári TK · 1.6 pts / match - Videoton

Csákvári TK - half-time state
33% leading43% draw23% trailing
Videoton - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.6
Csákvári TKVideoton
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Csákvári TKVideoton
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Csákvári TKVideoton
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.1
Csákvári TKVideoton
50%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Csákvári TKVideoton
47%No goal before half-time47%
Csákvári TKVideoton

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.2
Csákvári TKVideoton
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Csákvári TKVideoton
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Csákvári TKVideoton
1.37Average goals (2nd half)1.23
Csákvári TKVideoton
47%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Csákvári TKVideoton
50%No goal after half-time57%
Csákvári TKVideoton

Csákvári TK - second-half results

40% W30% R30% P
43
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Videoton - second-half results

30% W30% R40% P
48
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Csákvári TK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Videoton - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Csákvári TK
ScoredConceded
10
6
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
9
31-45
4
7
46-60
9
2
61-75
9
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Videoton
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
6
5
16-30
10
3
31-45
12
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
0
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Csákvári TK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Videoton

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).

Teams vs league

Csákvári TKLigaVideoton
Average goals in match 2.672.51 2.33
Both teams scored 57%48% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%45% 37%
Clean sheets 27%29% 33%
Goal before half-time 73%70% 73%
Goal after half-time 80%80% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Csákvári TK 0 - 1 - 0 Videoton. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Videoton FC Fehérvár
0 : 0
Csákvári TK

FAQ

What was the result of Csákvári TK vs Videoton?

The NB II match finished Csákvári TK 1:5 Videoton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Csákvári TK vs Videoton?

Csákvári TK score 1.43 goals per game on average and Videoton 1.23. The NB II average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Csákvári TK's matches and 47% of Videoton's.

What form are Csákvári TK and Videoton in?

Over the last 5 games Csákvári TK have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Videoton 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Csákvári TK vs Videoton?

The statistical background for Csákvári TK vs Videoton — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.