Csikszereda vs FCSB: match statistics
Csikszereda vs FCSB: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Csikszereda played FCSB in Liga I (Romania). The match was played on 1 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Csikszereda: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. FCSB: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Csikszereda scores 1.06 and concedes 1.81 goals per match. FCSB scores 1.69 and concedes 1.28. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Csikszereda 56%, FCSB 58%. Over 2.5: Csikszereda 53%, FCSB 56%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
FCSB has higher xG: 1.93 vs 1.25. Csikszereda: 11.2 shots per match, FCSB: 17.8.
Match halves
Csikszereda: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.47. FCSB: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
Csikszereda: 31-45+ (9 goals). FCSB: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga I: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FCSB is the favorite in this match due to a clear offensive superiority and better form: they have 61 goals this season versus Csikszereda’s 38, and have scored 13 goals in the last 5 matches with 4 wins, while the hosts scored 5 goals and won 2 of five. The visitors create better chances — average away xG 1.88 versus home xG 1.43 for the hosts, average shots on target 6.24 vs 4.47 and average attempts 17 vs 12.76, while also recording 58% possession vs 42% for the hosts, translating to greater control of the game. However, Csikszereda shows strong defensive numbers at home: they concede 1.24 goals per home match on average with xG against 1.81 (around 0.57 goals fewer than xG suggests), whereas FCSB concede 1.65 away despite xG against 1.18 (about 0.47 goals more than xG). Form also favors the visitors — FCSB average 2.4 points per match in the last 5 fixtures versus the hosts’ 1.6, which increases their chances of winning despite Csikszereda’s home solidity. On this basis I predict an FCSB win, but with a significant probability of a draw given the hosts’ 41% share of home draws and the relatively low number of goals conceded (1.24) in home matches.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
FCSB gives a strong BTTS signal: they have a seasonal BTTS of 71% and keep a clean sheet in only 18% of matches, averaging 1.94 goals with xG 1.88, and have scored 13 goals in the last 5 matches (2.6 avg). Csikszereda has a seasonal BTTS of 47% and a clean sheet in 42% of games, but their seasonal xG per match is 1.98 versus 1.47 actual goals, and they average 18.42 shots and 5.95 on target, indicating chance creation. Considering Csikszereda fail to score in 21% of matches (so score in 79%) and FCSB fail to score in 12% (so score in 88%), a simple calculation 0.79×0.88 yields about a 69.5% probability that both teams will score. Additionally, FCSB concede on average 1.2 goals in their last 5 matches, while Csikszereda average 1.0 conceded and 1.0 scored in their last 5, which increases the likelihood of both teams finding the net. Overall I recommend BTTS - Yes with a 70% probability versus 30% No, because the combination of FCSB’s 71% BTTS, 79% chance Csikszereda will score, and high xG for both teams creates the strongest signal for Both Teams To Score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.58 expected goals for Csikszereda (xG attack 1.98 vs opponent defensive xG 1.18) and 1.51 for FCSB (xG attack 1.88 vs home defensive xG 1.13), totaling 3.09 goals. At this level the model estimates roughly an 81% chance of at least 2 goals, ~60% for 3+ goals and ~37% for 4+ goals. Seasonal indicators further confirm an offensive profile: Over0.5 at home 89% and away 100%, and Over1.5 at 63% and 82% respectively, which strengthens the over signal. FCSB also has BTTS in 71% of matches, and the hosts score in 79% (seasonScoredOver05 79%), increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. For these reasons the strongest and most probable selection is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Csikszereda starts strongly: the hosts led at the break in 53% of matches and kept a clean sheet at half-time in 79% of games, with an average of 0.95 goals scored and only 0.32 conceded by the break. FCSB, however, is dangerous after the break — their away matches yield on average 1.88 goals in the second half, and the team itself scores 1.00 goal on average after the break; seasonally FCSB scores 1.94 goals per game versus 1.47 for the hosts. The visitors have a higher shot conversion rate (11% versus 8% for Csikszereda) and excellent form: 4 wins in their last 5 matches (80%), with 60% of those five games having them leading at the break, which demonstrates an ability to stage quick turnarounds. Therefore my best pick is HT/FT 1/2 — the hosts are likely to lead at half-time, while FCSB, thanks to their second-half strength and a high BTTS involvement (71%), have the greatest chances to win by full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Csikszereda | FCSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FCSB is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Csikszereda · 2.4 pts / match - FCSB
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FCSB is 59% better for: goals scored per match.
1.06 goals / match - Csikszereda · 1.69 goals / match - FCSB
FCSB is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.81 goals / match - Csikszereda · 1.28 goals / match - FCSB
Csikszereda scores in 72% of matches (26 of 36 matches), while FCSB keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).
FCSB scores in 83% of matches (30 of 36 matches), while Csikszereda keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Csikszereda
Over / Under - FCSB
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FCSB is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.03 pts / match - Csikszereda · 1.72 pts / match - FCSB
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Csikszereda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
FCSB - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Csikszereda
FCSB
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| Csikszereda | Liga | FCSB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.86 | 2.54 | ▲ 2.97 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 51% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 47% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 28% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 68% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 75% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Csikszereda 0 - 1 - 1 FCSB. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Csikszereda vs FCSB?
The Liga I match finished Csikszereda 1:0 FCSB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Csikszereda and FCSB?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Csikszereda won 0, FCSB won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Csikszereda vs FCSB?
Csikszereda score 1.06 goals per game on average and FCSB 1.69. The Liga I average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Csikszereda's matches and 58% of FCSB's.
What form are Csikszereda and FCSB in?
Over the last 5 games Csikszereda have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and FCSB 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Csikszereda vs FCSB?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Csikszereda vs FCSB: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


