CSM Reşiţa vs Concordia Chiajna: match statistics
CSM Reşiţa vs Concordia Chiajna: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CSM Reşiţa played Concordia Chiajna in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
CSM Reşiţa: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Concordia Chiajna: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
CSM Reşiţa scores 1.63 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Concordia Chiajna scores 1.38 and concedes 1.04. League average: 2.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CSM Reşiţa 50%, Concordia Chiajna 42%. Over 2.5: CSM Reşiţa 46%, Concordia Chiajna 33%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
CSM Reşiţa has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.64. CSM Reşiţa: 14.4 shots per match, Concordia Chiajna: 12.8.
Match halves
CSM Reşiţa: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.63. Concordia Chiajna: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
CSM Reşiţa: 31-45+ (9 goals). Concordia Chiajna: 61-75 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga II: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CSM Reşiţa is the favorite in this match due to significantly superior home offensive metrics: home average xG is 1.98 versus 1.40 for Concordia, and average goals scored at home are 1.85 compared to only 0.73 scored by Concordia away. The hosts average 6.08 shots on target and 15.23 shots per match versus the visitors' 3.09 shots on target and 11.36 shots per match, and a conversion rate of 12% vs 6% further amplifies their advantage. Defensively, Reşiţa concedes 1.08 goals at home on average, has 46% clean sheets and 62% wins in home matches, while Concordia concedes 1.27 goals away, has only 18% clean sheets and 18% away wins. Concordia’s only asset is better recent form over the last 5 matches (an average of 2.0 points per game versus Reşiţa’s 1.6) and 8 goals scored in the last 5 fixtures compared to the hosts’ 6. Considering the advantage in xG, efficiency and number of shots on target for the home side, I predict a CSM Reşiţa win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back 'No' (Both Teams To Score - No) with a 60% confidence vs 40% for 'Yes'. CSM Reşiţa averages 1.92 goals scored and concedes 0.85 per match, keeping a clean sheet in 46% of games, while Concordia scores only 0.73 goals per game and registers 3.09 shots on target. In xG terms the hosts have xG 1.84, Concordia’s defense concedes 1.53 xG, whereas the visitors have xG 1.4 but their season shot conversion is just 6% versus the hosts’ 14%, which limits their realistic scoring chances. Short-term form favours Concordia (last 5: 1.6 goals and xG 1.58 on average, 8 goals scored), and the hosts have 60% BTTS in their last five, yet season BTTS rates are 38% for the hosts and 45% for the visitors. Overall the hosts’ defensive edge (46% clean sheets) and the visitors’ low conversion (3.09 SoT and 6% conversion) outweigh Concordia’s short-term uptick, so I pick 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
CSM Reşiţa scores on average 1.92 goals per match (xG 1.84), has a 14% shot conversion rate and 5.69 shots on target per game; Concordia Chiajna averages 0.73 goals with xG 1.40, only 6% conversion and 3.09 shots on target, indicating chance creation without effective finishing. Combining the home xG 1.84 with the xG against the visitors 1.53 yields an estimated 1.69 expected goals for CSM, while combining the visitors' xG 1.40 with the xG against the hosts 1.39 yields an estimated 1.40 for Concordia, totaling 3.09 expected goals. From a Poisson distribution for a sum of 3.09 there is roughly an 81% chance of at least 2 goals, about 60% for at least 3 goals and about 37% for at least 4 goals. Additionally, the home side have 77% of matches with over 1.5 goals and 38% with over 2.5 goals this season, the visitors have 55% and 27% respectively, and both teams score over 0.5 goals in 100% (home) and 91% (away) of matches, which reinforces the scoring scenario. In light of these figures the strongest signal is backing Over 1.5 (selection), while Over 2.5 remains moderately likely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
CSM Reşiţa holds a clear advantage: at home they score on average 1.92 goals and concede 0.85, whereas Concordia Chiajna score 0.73 and concede 1.27; the hosts also have a 62% win rate versus 18% for the visitors. At half-time CSM led in 38% of matches and score an average of 0.69 goals by the break versus 0.27 for Concordia, so a lead at the break for the hosts is the natural scenario. In the second half the hosts score on average 1.23 goals and concede only 0.31, and at home they keep a clean sheet in 46% of games — this indicates that when leading at the break they often see the win through. Additionally, the hosts’ xG is 1.84 versus 1.40 for the visitors, and average shots on target are 5.69 vs 3.09; a higher shot conversion rate of 14% versus 6% for the visitors confirms the hosts’ attacking edge. Therefore I selected HT/FT 1/1 as the most likely outcome (38%), with alternatives X/1 (19%) and X/X (11%), while a turnaround in favour of the visitors is unlikely (1/2 only 2%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CSM Reşiţa | Concordia Chiajna | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Concordia Chiajna is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - CSM Reşiţa · 2 pts / match - Concordia Chiajna
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CSM Reşiţa is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.63 goals / match - CSM Reşiţa · 1.38 goals / match - Concordia Chiajna
Concordia Chiajna is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - CSM Reşiţa · 1.04 goals / match - Concordia Chiajna
CSM Reşiţa scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Concordia Chiajna keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 matches).
Concordia Chiajna scores in 71% of matches (17 of 24 matches), while CSM Reşiţa keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CSM Reşiţa
Over / Under - Concordia Chiajna
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CSM Reşiţa is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / match - CSM Reşiţa · 1.08 pts / match - Concordia Chiajna
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CSM Reşiţa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Concordia Chiajna - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CSM Reşiţa
Concordia Chiajna
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| CSM Reşiţa | Liga | Concordia Chiajna | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.88 | 2.69 | ▼ 2.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 48% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 49% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 30% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 81% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CSM Reşiţa 1 - 0 - 0 Concordia Chiajna. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CSM Reşiţa vs Concordia Chiajna?
The Liga II match finished CSM Reşiţa 1:2 Concordia Chiajna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CSM Reşiţa vs Concordia Chiajna?
CSM Reşiţa score 1.63 goals per game on average and Concordia Chiajna 1.38. The Liga II average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 50% of CSM Reşiţa's matches and 42% of Concordia Chiajna's.
What form are CSM Reşiţa and Concordia Chiajna in?
Over the last 5 games CSM Reşiţa have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Concordia Chiajna 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CSM Reşiţa vs Concordia Chiajna?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


