CSM Satu Mare vs Tunari: match statistics
CSM Satu Mare vs Tunari: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CSM Satu Mare played Tunari in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
CSM Satu Mare: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Tunari: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
CSM Satu Mare scores 1.23 and concedes 1.96 goals per match. Tunari scores 0.92 and concedes 1.69. League average: 2.70 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CSM Satu Mare 54%, Tunari 62%. Over 2.5: CSM Satu Mare 58%, Tunari 50%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
CSM Satu Mare has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.22. CSM Satu Mare: 10.3 shots per match, Tunari: 9.3.
Match halves
CSM Satu Mare: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.92. Tunari: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
CSM Satu Mare: 76-90+ (9 goals). Tunari: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga II: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back CSM Satu Mare to win (1) because the hosts have scored 13 goals in their last 5 matches and won 4 of 5, averaging 2.4 points per game, while Tunari scored only 5 goals in the same period and average 1.4 points per game. At home CSM averages 1.58 goals with 4.17 shots on target and 53% possession, whereas Tunari away average just 0.92 goals, 2.54 shots on target and 47% possession, giving the hosts an advantage in chance creation. Home xG for the hosts is 1.54 versus the visitors’ away xG of 1.06, and shot conversion is 13% for CSM versus 11% for Tunari, so finishing quality favors the hosts. Both teams show defensive vulnerabilities — the hosts concede 2.17 goals on average at home, Tunari concede 1.54 away, while visitors have a higher average xG against (1.75), suggesting greater susceptibility to high-quality chances. Considering the superiority in chance volume (11.92 vs 8.31 average shots per game), better xG and clearly superior form (2.4 vs 1.4 pts/game over the last 5), I assess probabilities as: home 62%, draw 20%, away 18%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a season BTTS rate of 62% (home 62%, away 62%) and 60% in the last 5 matches for both, meaning roughly 6 in 10 fixtures saw both sides score. Very low clean sheet rates — 8% for home and 8% for away — and average goals conceded 1.85 (home) and 1.54 (away) indicate keeping a clean sheet is rare. In the short term the home side scored 13 goals in the last 5 matches (2.6 per match, xG 1.67), while the away side has 5 goals in the last 5 (1.0 per match, xG 1.29) and conceded 8 goals (1.6 per match), which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Season xGA are 2.05 for home and 1.75 for away, and shots on target 3.69 vs 2.54 suggest both teams create and allow scoring opportunities. Therefore I prefer BTTS - Yes (75% vs 25%) because the combination of 62% season BTTS, 60% in the last 5 matches and only 8% clean sheets provides the strongest signal for both teams to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model forecasts 1.58 expected goals for CSM Satu Mare and 1.55 for Tunari (total 3.13), based on xG: the home side averages 1.40 xG, the away side 1.06 xG, while the home defense concedes 2.05 xG versus 1.75 xG for the visitors. Both teams have 85% of matches this season with over 1.5 goals (seasonOver15 85% for both), and the home team has 100% of home matches with at least 1 goal, which is a strong argument for Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line, season rates are 54% Over 2.5 for the home team and 46% for the away team (league 49%), but in the last 5 matches the home side had 80% Over 2.5 and the visitors 60%, so the model rates Over 2.5 at roughly 62%. Over 3.5 is a weaker signal — the seasonal percentage is only 23% for both teams and although the home team scored 13 goals in 5 matches (avg. 2.6 scored and 1.2 conceded), the probability for Over 3.5 remains low (~30%), so the best and strongest pick from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I assess the most likely scenario as a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time: the average of half-time draw percentages is (38% for home + 54% for away)/2 = 46%, while home teams led at the break in 0% of their matches and away teams in 23%. I assume that about 40% of those half-time draws will remain draws after 90 minutes, yielding roughly an 18% overall probability for X/X. Additionally, the away side has a high draw rate (drawPercentage_away 46%) and a low average of goals conceded by half-time (concededAVGHT_away 0.38 vs concededAVGHT_home 1.08), which limits quick turnarounds after the break. On the other hand, the home team responds strongly after the interval (they win the second half in 54% of matches and have scored on average 2.0 goals after half-time in the last 5 games), so the X/1 (16%) and 2/1 (14%) scenarios have been given significant weight as realistic alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CSM Satu Mare | Tunari | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CSM Satu Mare is 71% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - CSM Satu Mare · 1.4 pts / match - Tunari
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CSM Satu Mare is 34% better for: goals scored per match.
1.23 goals / match - CSM Satu Mare · 0.92 goals / match - Tunari
Tunari is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.96 goals / match - CSM Satu Mare · 1.69 goals / match - Tunari
CSM Satu Mare scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Tunari keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 26 matches).
Tunari scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while CSM Satu Mare keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CSM Satu Mare
Over / Under - Tunari
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CSM Satu Mare - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tunari - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CSM Satu Mare
Tunari
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| CSM Satu Mare | Liga | Tunari | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.19 | 2.70 | • 2.62 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 49% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 49% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 29% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 72% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 82% | ▲ 96% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- CSM Satu MareGoalKévin Mbala
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CSM Satu Mare 0 - 1 - 0 Tunari. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CSM Satu Mare vs Tunari?
The Liga II match finished CSM Satu Mare 1:1 Tunari. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CSM Satu Mare vs Tunari?
CSM Satu Mare score 1.23 goals per game on average and Tunari 0.92. The Liga II average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 54% of CSM Satu Mare's matches and 62% of Tunari's.
What form are CSM Satu Mare and Tunari in?
Over the last 5 games CSM Satu Mare have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Tunari 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CSM Satu Mare vs Tunari?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


