Serbia - SuperLigaStadion na Banovom brduData current as of 17 October 2026

Čukarički vs Mačva Šabac: match statistics

Čukarički crest
Čukarički
2 : 2half-time 2:1
Mačva Šabac crest
Mačva Šabac

Čukarički vs Mačva Šabac: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Čukarički played Mačva Šabac in SuperLiga (Serbia). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Stadion na Banovom brdu. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Čukarički: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Mačva Šabac: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Čukarički scores 1.20 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. Mačva Šabac scores 0.60 and concedes 1.70. League average: 2.65 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Čukarički 40%, Mačva Šabac 40%. Over 2.5: Čukarički 60%, Mačva Šabac 40%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Čukarički has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.04. Čukarički: 11.3 shots per match, Mačva Šabac: 9.0.

Match halves

Čukarički: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.30. Mačva Šabac: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Čukarički: 16-30 (6 goals). Mačva Šabac: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

SuperLiga: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Čukarički have a clear home advantage: they have won 40% of their home matches, while Mačva Šabac have lost 80% of their away fixtures and are yet to win one. The hosts average 1.2 goals at home with an xG of 1.41, while the visitors score just 0.4 goals away from home with an xG of 0.78. The disparity in chance quality is reflected in Mačva’s defensive record: away from home, they allow an average xG of 2.6 and concede 2.4 goals per match. However, the hosts’ recent form is a concern: they have failed to win any of their last five matches and conceded 15 goals, while the visitors conceded 5 over the same period. Despite this, Mačva’s poor away form—they have failed to score in 60% of their away matches—points to a Čukarički win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest case against both teams scoring comes from Mačva Šabac’s attack: the visitors average just 0.4 goals and fail to score in 60% of their matches. Čukarički keep a clean sheet in 60% of games, further increasing the risk that the visitors will be held scoreless. The hosts are more likely to find the net, as their opponents concede an average of 2.4 goals and allow chances worth 2.60 xG, while their own xG is just 0.78. Although Čukarički conceded an average of 3.0 goals over their last five matches, Mačva scored only 0.6 goals per game over the same period. Both teams have a season-long rate of 40% for matches in which both sides score, making BTTS - No the more likely outcome: at least one team is expected not to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Čukarički average 0.8 goals at home, while Mačva concede 2.4 goals away, giving the hosts a clear opportunity to score. However, the visitors average just 0.4 goals away and register 1.4 shots on target, while the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 60% of their home matches. In both teams’ matches, 80% of results have stayed below 3.5 goals, making this line look safer than 2.5 goals. The risk of a higher-scoring game is increased by the fact that Čukarički have conceded 15 goals in their last 5 matches, but with a projected total of 2.37 goals, the strongest signal still points to Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: Mačva were level at the break in 60% of their away matches, and in as many as 80% of their last five games, regardless of venue. The visitors have yet to score in the first half of an away match, but they have kept a clean sheet at half-time in each of their last five games, which weighs against Čukarički taking an early lead. After the break, the balance should shift in the hosts’ favour, as Mačva concede an average of 1.6 goals in the second half away from home and have lost 80% of their away matches. Čukarički average 1.31 xG at home, compared with the visitors’ 0.78 xG away, while Mačva allow opponents chances worth 2.60 xG per match. However, the X/1 pick is undermined by the hosts’ poor recent form: they have failed to win any of their last five matches, so a win after a goalless or level first half is far from certain.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
17Shots9
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
5Shots on target3
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
1.84xG1.22
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
3Corners2
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
58Dangerous attacks62
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
18Fouls10
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
6Cards2
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
1.2Goals scored / match0.6
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
1.8Goals conceded / match1.7
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
42%Average possession40%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
4.1Shots on target / match2.2
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.3Shots per match9
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
4.1Shots on target2.2
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
10.6%Shot conversion6.7%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
42%Possession40%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
1.28xG for1.04
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
1.8xG against2.2
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac

Shooting quality

Čukarički: BalancedMačva Šabac: Balanced
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
Accuracy (shots on target)36%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mačva Šabac is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Čukarički · 1 pts / match - Mačva Šabac

Čukarički
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
30% W20% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-5
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Mačva Šabac
WDDLL
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-6
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 2.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Čukarički is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Čukarički · 0.6 goals / match - Mačva Šabac

Mačva Šabac is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.8 goals / match - Čukarički · 1.7 goals / match - Mačva Šabac

Čukarički scoring profile: strong

Čukarički scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Mačva Šabac keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

Mačva Šabac scoring profile: strong

Mačva Šabac scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Čukarički keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

12Goals scored (season)6
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
18Goals conceded (season)17
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
3Average goals in match2.3
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
3Goals scored (last 5)3
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
15Goals conceded (last 5)5
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal60%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
40%2 goals0%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
10%3 goals0%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
0%4 goals0%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal70%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
50%2 goals60%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
30%3 goals20%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
20%4 goals10%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time0%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
20%Scored in both halves0%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
30%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
60%BTTS - last 540%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time70%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Čukarički is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Čukarički · 1.1 pts / match - Mačva Šabac

Čukarički - half-time state
50% leading10% draw40% trailing
Mačva Šabac - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.1
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.2
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
1.7Average goals (1st half)0.7
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
50%Clean sheet before half-time70%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
40%No goal before half-time80%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.7
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
0.3Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.6
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
60%Clean sheet after half-time30%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac
70%No goal after half-time60%
ČukaričkiMačva Šabac

Čukarički - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding60%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 30%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mačva Šabac - second-half results

10% W40% D50% L
11
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Čukarički - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.41.6
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-5-7
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mačva Šabac - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.21.4
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Čukarički
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
6
1
16-30
1
5
31-45
1
4
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Mačva Šabac
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Čukarički

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
186%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Mačva Šabac

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (SuperLiga).

Teams vs league

ČukaričkiLigaMačva Šabac
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.65▼ 2.30
Both teams scored▼ 40%46%▼ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%49%▼ 40%
Clean sheets• 30%31%• 30%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%74%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 60%71%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
0.97
Away goals / match
+73%
Home attack advantage
+42%
Home defence advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ČukaričkiGoalZlatan ŠehovićAssist: Lazar Marković
  2. ČukaričkiGoalĐorđe JovanovićAssist: Remy Rees-Dottin
  3. ČukaričkiYellow cardMilan Đoković
  4. Mačva ŠabacGoalMitar ErgelasAssist: Boško Vraštanović
  5. ČukaričkiYellow cardRemy Rees-Dottin
  6. Mačva ŠabacYellow cardMilan Vidakov
  7. ČukaričkiYellow cardMarko Docić
  8. ČukaričkiYellow cardMarko Docić
  9. Mačva ŠabacSubstitutionOn: Darko TerzićOff: Boško Vraštanović
  10. ČukaričkiSubstitutionOn: Nemanja MiletićOff: Đorđe Jovanović
  11. Mačva ŠabacYellow cardNikola Lainović
  12. Mačva ŠabacGoalStefan ČolovićAssist: Vasilije Đurić
  13. ČukaričkiYellow cardLuka Đorđević
  14. ČukaričkiSubstitutionOn: Milan PavkovOff: Milan Đoković
  15. ČukaričkiYellow cardUroš Miladinović

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Čukarički vs Mačva Šabac?

The SuperLiga match finished Čukarički 2:2 Mačva Šabac. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Čukarički vs Mačva Šabac?

Čukarički score 1.20 goals per game on average and Mačva Šabac 0.60. The SuperLiga average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Čukarički's matches and 40% of Mačva Šabac's.

What form are Čukarički and Mačva Šabac in?

Over the last 5 games Čukarički have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Mačva Šabac 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Čukarički vs Mačva Šabac?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.