Serbia - SuperLigaData current as of 12 September 2026

Čukarički vs Železničar Pančevo: match statistics

145%(2.10)
X30%(3.25)
225%(3.24)

Čukarički displays solid home form with a 46% win rate at home and an impressive average of 1.77 goals per match. The hosts have a positive goal difference at home (+5), while Železničar Pančevo has a negative goal difference away (-1). A key factor is Čukarički's efficiency in front of their home crowd – only 0% of matches without a goal scored compared to 31% for the visitors away from home. Železničar has better recent form (1.6 PTS/match vs 1.0), but their away statistics (31% wins, 1.31 goals/match) are significantly weaker than Čukarički's home stats. Expected goals (xG) are similar for both teams, suggesting a balanced contest, but the home advantage and better scoring efficiency favor the hosts. I expect a fiercely contested match with a slight advantage for Čukarički.

Čukarički vs Železničar Pančevo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Čukarički played Železničar Pančevo in SuperLiga (Serbia). The match was played on 22 March 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Čukarički: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Železničar Pančevo: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Čukarički scores 1.44 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Železničar Pančevo scores 1.33 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Čukarički 78%, Železničar Pančevo 37%. Over 2.5: Čukarički 52%, Železničar Pančevo 41%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Čukarički has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.44. Čukarički: 13.2 shots per match, Železničar Pančevo: 11.4.

Match halves

Čukarički: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.63. Železničar Pančevo: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Čukarički: 16-30 (11 goals). Železničar Pančevo: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

SuperLiga: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Čukarički displays solid home form with a 46% win rate at home and an impressive average of 1.77 goals per match. The hosts have a positive goal difference at home (+5), while Železničar Pančevo has a negative goal difference away (-1). A key factor is Čukarički's efficiency in front of their home crowd – only 0% of matches without a goal scored compared to 31% for the visitors away from home. Železničar has better recent form (1.6 PTS/match vs 1.0), but their away statistics (31% wins, 1.31 goals/match) are significantly weaker than Čukarički's home stats. Expected goals (xG) are similar for both teams, suggesting a balanced contest, but the home advantage and better scoring efficiency favor the hosts. I expect a fiercely contested match with a slight advantage for Čukarički.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

31Possession (%)69
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
9Shots10
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
6Shots on target4
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
1.31xG1.42
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
0Corners6
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
44Dangerous attacks71
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
13Fouls11
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
3Cards3
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
1.44Goals scored / match1.33
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
1.52Goals conceded / match0.96
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
49%Average possession52%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
4.56Shots on target / match4.19
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.15Shots per match11.37
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
4.56Shots on target4.19
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
11%Shot conversion11.7%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
49%Possession52%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
1.58xG for1.44
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
1.58xG against1.46
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo

Shooting quality

Čukarički: BalancedŽelezničar Pančevo: Balanced
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
Accuracy (shots on target)35%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Železničar Pančevo is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Čukarički · 1.6 pts / match - Železničar Pančevo

Čukarički
LDWLD
Season result split
33% W30% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-10
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Železničar Pančevo
LDWDW
Season result split
48% W22% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-6-8
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Čukarički is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.44 goals / match - Čukarički · 1.33 goals / match - Železničar Pančevo

Železničar Pančevo is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.52 goals / match - Čukarički · 0.96 goals / match - Železničar Pančevo

Čukarički scoring profile: strong

Čukarički scores in 85% of matches (23 of 27 matches), while Železničar Pančevo keeps a clean sheet in 48% (13 of 27 matches).

Železničar Pančevo scoring profile: very strong

Železničar Pančevo scores in 74% of matches (20 of 27 matches), while Čukarički keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 27 matches).

39Goals scored (season)36
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
41Goals conceded (season)26
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
2.96Average goals in match2.3
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
7Goals scored (last 5)7
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal74%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
33%2 goals30%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
19%3 goals19%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
7%4 goals7%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo

How often they concede at least...

93%1 goal52%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
33%2 goals19%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
26%3 goals11%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
0%4 goals4%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

37%
Železničar Pančevo - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 27 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time7%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
7%BTTS in both halves0%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
22%Scored in both halves19%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
80%BTTS - last 50%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

89%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Železničar Pančevo is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.44 pts / match - Čukarički · 1.63 pts / match - Železničar Pančevo

Čukarički - half-time state
41% leading22% draw37% trailing
Železničar Pančevo - half-time state
41% leading41% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per match (1st half)1.63
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.7
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
0.74Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.11
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
41%Clean sheet before half-time74%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
41%No goal before half-time56%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)1.41
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
1.41Average goals (2nd half)1.19
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
41%Clean sheet after half-time59%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo
52%No goal after half-time52%
ČukaričkiŽelezničar Pančevo

Čukarički - second-half results

26% W37% D37% L
39
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Železničar Pančevo - second-half results

33% W41% D26% L
44
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Čukarički - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Železničar Pančevo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Čukarički
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
11
2
16-30
9
11
31-45
7
7
46-60
2
5
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Železničar Pančevo
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
8
3
16-30
8
5
31-45
3
2
46-60
9
7
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-62%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Čukarički

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Železničar Pančevo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (SuperLiga).

Teams vs league

ČukaričkiLigaŽelezničar Pančevo
Average goals in match 2.962.68 2.30
Both teams scored 78%52% 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%48% 41%
Clean sheets 7%29% 48%
Goal before half-time 89%71% 63%
Goal after half-time 78%74% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ČukaričkiYellow cardSrđan Mijailović
  2. ČukaričkiYellow cardMiloš Cvetković
  3. Železničar PančevoYellow cardKarikari Kwaku
  4. ČukaričkiSubstitutionOn: Lazar MijovićOff: Aboubacar Cisse
  5. ČukaričkiYellow cardSambou Sissoko
  6. ČukaričkiSubstitutionOn: Nemanja MiletićOff: Miloš Cvetković
  7. Železničar PančevoYellow cardMarko Konatar
  8. ČukaričkiGoalFilip Matijašević
  9. Železničar PančevoGoalKarikari Kwaku
  10. Železničar PančevoGoalNikola Jovanović
  11. ČukaričkiSubstitutionOn: Bojica NikčevićOff: Lazar Mijović
  12. Železničar PančevoYellow cardKarikari Kwaku
  13. ČukaričkiSubstitutionOn: Milan PavkovOff: Nenad Tomović

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Andrija StojanovićMatches officiated: 10
3.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 230%Home wins30%Draws40%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Čukarički 0 - 0 - 1 Železničar Pančevo. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FK Železničar Pančevo
1 : 0
FK Čukarički Stankom

FAQ

What was the result of Čukarički vs Železničar Pančevo?

The SuperLiga match finished Čukarički 3:2 Železničar Pančevo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Čukarički vs Železničar Pančevo?

Čukarički score 1.44 goals per game on average and Železničar Pančevo 1.33. The SuperLiga average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Čukarički's matches and 37% of Železničar Pančevo's.

What form are Čukarički and Železničar Pančevo in?

Over the last 5 games Čukarički have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Železničar Pančevo 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Čukarički vs Železničar Pančevo?

The statistical background for Čukarički vs Železničar Pančevo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.