Curaçao vs Ivory Coast: match statistics
Curaçao vs Ivory Coast: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Curaçao played Ivory Coast in World Cup (International). The match was played on 25 June 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Curaçao: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match. Ivory Coast: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match.
Goal statistics
Curaçao scores 0.50 and concedes 3.50 goals per match. Ivory Coast scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Curaçao 50%, Ivory Coast 50%. Over 2.5: Curaçao 50%, Ivory Coast 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Ivory Coast has higher xG: 1.37 vs 0.90. Curaçao: 9.0 shots per match, Ivory Coast: 12.0.
Match halves
Curaçao: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Ivory Coast: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Curaçao: 16-30 (1 goals). Ivory Coast: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
World Cup: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Typ 1X2: 2. Curaçao recovered from a 1-7 defeat against Germany and won a historic 0-0 against Ecuador, but it required fifteen goalkeeper interventions. Ivory Coast defeated Ecuador and only lost to Germany at the end. The African team has more physical strength, better set pieces and higher quality substitutions. Our independent rating is 17% for Curaçao, 29% for draw and 54% for Ivory Coast. The most likely outcome profile is 0:1 or 0:2; the type has 54% and takes into account motivation, rotation and the course of the first two rounds. Status: SMALL BET
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Typ BTTS: no. Curaçao recovered from a 1-7 defeat against Germany and won a historic 0-0 against Ecuador, but it required fifteen goalkeeper interventions. Ivory Coast defeated Ecuador and only lost to Germany at the end. The African team has more physical strength, better set pieces and higher quality substitutions. Curaçao continues to generate few chances, and the draw with Ecuador was more a result of phenomenal goal defense than offensive improvement. The goal model yields 42% for BTTS Yes and 58% for BTTS No, with expected goals of 0.75 for Curaçao and 1.60 for Ivory Coast. This is not a conclusion from the odds, but from the quality of the situations created, the style of the match and the needs of the table. Status: SMALL BET
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Typ: Under 2.5. Curaçao recovered from a 1-7 defeat against Germany and won a historic 0-0 against Ecuador, but it required fifteen goalkeeper interventions. Ivory Coast defeated Ecuador and only lost to Germany at the end. The African team has more physical strength, better set pieces and higher quality substitutions. The model gives 42% on Over 2.5 and 58% on Under 2.5, with xG Curaçao 0.75, Ivory Coast 1.60 and 2.35 in total. On line 2.5, the goal of the weaker side is crucial: the result of 2:0 leaves the under, while 2:1 immediately moves the match to the over. A 0:1 or 0:2 profile explains why the advantage of the selected market side is not always large. Status: SMALL BET
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Typ HT/FT: 2/2. Curaçao recovered from a 1-7 defeat against Germany and won a historic 0-0 against Ecuador, but it required fifteen goalkeeper interventions. Ivory Coast defeated Ecuador and only lost to Germany at the end. The African team has more physical strength, better set pieces and higher quality substitutions. Ivory Coast may need patience, but once it takes the lead it should be in a position to maintain its advantage. The highest paths were 2/2 32%, X/2 20% and X/X 19%. The HT/FT distribution has been calibrated so that its final result is consistent with our 1X2: 17%–29%–54%. This is a high-variance market, so the stake should be lower than the base market. Status: SMALL BET
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Curaçao | Ivory Coast | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 25% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ivory Coast is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.5 pts / match - Curaçao · 1.5 pts / match - Ivory Coast
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ivory Coast is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
0.5 goals / match - Curaçao · 1 goals / match - Ivory Coast
Ivory Coast is 250% better for: goals conceded per match.
3.5 goals / match - Curaçao · 1 goals / match - Ivory Coast
Curaçao scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Ivory Coast keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).
Ivory Coast scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Curaçao keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Curaçao
Over / Under - Ivory Coast
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ivory Coast is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / match - Curaçao · 2 pts / match - Ivory Coast
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Curaçao - second-half results
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ivory Coast - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Curaçao
Ivory Coast
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (World Cup).
Teams vs league
| Curaçao | Liga | Ivory Coast | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.00 | 2.98 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 28% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 70% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Curaçao vs Ivory Coast?
The World Cup match finished Curaçao 0:2 Ivory Coast. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Curaçao vs Ivory Coast?
Curaçao score 0.50 goals per game on average and Ivory Coast 1.00. The World Cup average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Curaçao's matches and 50% of Ivory Coast's.
What form are Curaçao and Ivory Coast in?
Over the last 5 games Curaçao have a 0-1-1 record (0.50 points per game) and Ivory Coast 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Curaçao vs Ivory Coast?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Curaçao vs Ivory Coast: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.