Slovakia - Super LigaData current as of 12 September 2026

DAC vs Skalica: match statistics

DAC crest
DAC
3 : 2half-time 3:0
Skalica crest
Skalica
170%(1.45)
X20%(4.50)
210%(5.75)

DAC demonstrates a decisive advantage as the home side, occupying 2nd place in the table with a 50% home win rate and an impressive average of 2.42 xG per home match. Skalica, on the other hand, has a disastrous away record - merely 10% wins, 80% losses, and zero clean sheets, conceding an average of 1.9 goals per match. The difference in quality is confirmed by possession statistics (62% vs 46%) and the average shots on target (7.2 vs 3.2). Despite Skalica's good form in their last 5 matches overall, their away run remains dreadful with only one win in their last 10 outings. The goal difference of the hosts (+7) compared to the visitors' away record (-10) further confirms DAC's clear advantage, making a home victory the most likely scenario for this fixture.

DAC vs Skalica: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

DAC played Skalica in Super Liga (Slovakia). The match was played on 21 February 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

DAC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Skalica: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

DAC scores 1.80 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Skalica scores 0.90 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: DAC 50%, Skalica 50%. Over 2.5: DAC 50%, Skalica 40%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

DAC has higher xG: 2.01 vs 1.21. DAC: 18.8 shots per match, Skalica: 10.8.

Match halves

DAC: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.90. Skalica: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

DAC: 61-75 (11 goals). Skalica: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super Liga: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

DAC demonstrates a decisive advantage as the home side, occupying 2nd place in the table with a 50% home win rate and an impressive average of 2.42 xG per home match. Skalica, on the other hand, has a disastrous away record - merely 10% wins, 80% losses, and zero clean sheets, conceding an average of 1.9 goals per match. The difference in quality is confirmed by possession statistics (62% vs 46%) and the average shots on target (7.2 vs 3.2). Despite Skalica's good form in their last 5 matches overall, their away run remains dreadful with only one win in their last 10 outings. The goal difference of the hosts (+7) compared to the visitors' away record (-10) further confirms DAC's clear advantage, making a home victory the most likely scenario for this fixture.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
DACSkalica
16Shots22
DACSkalica
7Shots on target8
DACSkalica
1.78xG2.34
DACSkalica
5Corners7
DACSkalica
39Dangerous attacks56
DACSkalica
6Fouls12
DACSkalica
1Cards0
DACSkalica

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.8Goals scored / match0.9
DACSkalica
0.9Goals conceded / match1.55
DACSkalica
59%Average possession42%
DACSkalica
6.15Shots on target / match3.1
DACSkalica

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

18.75Shots per match10.8
DACSkalica
6.15Shots on target3.1
DACSkalica
9.6%Shot conversion8.3%
DACSkalica
59%Possession42%
DACSkalica
2.01xG for1.21
DACSkalica
1.35xG against1.75
DACSkalica

Shooting quality

DAC: DominantSkalica: Balanced
DACSkalica
Accuracy (shots on target)33%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

DAC is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - DAC · 0.8 pts / match - Skalica

DAC
WWWLD
Season result split
55% W30% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-3
1.95 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Skalica
LDLLW
Season result split
15% W35% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-10
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

DAC is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

1.8 goals / match - DAC · 0.9 goals / match - Skalica

DAC is 72% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.9 goals / match - DAC · 1.55 goals / match - Skalica

DAC scoring profile: very strong

DAC scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Skalica keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).

Skalica scoring profile: mixed

Skalica scores in 55% of matches (11 of 20 matches), while DAC keeps a clean sheet in 45% (9 of 20 matches).

36Goals scored (season)18
DACSkalica
18Goals conceded (season)31
DACSkalica
2.7Average goals in match2.45
DACSkalica
9Goals scored (last 5)6
DACSkalica
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
DACSkalica

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal55%
DACSkalica
55%2 goals30%
DACSkalica
30%3 goals5%
DACSkalica
10%4 goals0%
DACSkalica

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal85%
DACSkalica
25%2 goals45%
DACSkalica
10%3 goals20%
DACSkalica
0%4 goals5%
DACSkalica

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time10%
DACSkalica
10%BTTS in both halves10%
DACSkalica
40%Scored in both halves20%
DACSkalica

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
DACSkalica
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
DACSkalica
40%BTTS - last 580%
DACSkalica

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
DACSkalica
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
DACSkalica
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
DACSkalica

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
DACSkalica
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
DACSkalica
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
DACSkalica

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

DAC is 89% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / match - DAC · 0.95 pts / match - Skalica

DAC - half-time state
50% leading30% draw20% trailing
Skalica - half-time state
20% leading35% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per match (1st half)0.95
DACSkalica
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.3
DACSkalica
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
DACSkalica
1.35Average goals (1st half)1.05
DACSkalica
65%Clean sheet before half-time55%
DACSkalica
35%No goal before half-time70%
DACSkalica

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)0.95
DACSkalica
0.9Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
DACSkalica
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
DACSkalica
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.4
DACSkalica
65%Clean sheet after half-time35%
DACSkalica
40%No goal after half-time55%
DACSkalica

DAC - second-half results

45% W40% D15% L
36
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Skalica - second-half results

10% W65% D25% L
19
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

DAC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.00
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6
Skalica - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

DAC
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
5
1
16-30
7
5
31-45
2
5
46-60
11
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Skalica
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
5
16-30
2
7
31-45
3
2
46-60
6
6
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

DAC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Skalica

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).

Teams vs league

DACLigaSkalica
Average goals in match 2.702.92 2.45
Both teams scored 50%54% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%56% 40%
Clean sheets 45%26% 15%
Goal before half-time 85%75% 65%
Goal after half-time 70%74% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SkalicaSubstitutionOn: Martin ČernekOff: Mario Suver
  2. SkalicaSubstitutionOn: Damián BarišOff: Mário Hollý
  3. SkalicaSubstitutionOn: Philip Obinna OnyedikaOff: Lukáš Leginus
  4. DACSubstitutionOn: Nino KukovecOff: Pa Assan Corr
  5. SkalicaSubstitutionOn: Adam RavasOff: Abbati Abdullahi
  6. SkalicaGoalTomáš Smejkal
  7. DACSubstitutionOn: Filip BlažekOff: Taras Kacharaba
  8. DACSubstitutionOn: Alioune SyllaOff: Ammar Ramadan
  9. SkalicaGoalAdam RavasAssist: Lukáš Fabiš
  10. SkalicaSubstitutionOn: Martin MášikOff: Petr Pudhorocký
  11. DACYellow cardAmmar Ramadan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Boris BenedikMatches officiated: 8
4Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 263%Home wins25%Draws13%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: DAC 0 - 1 - 0 Skalica. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

MFK Skalica
1 : 1
DAC 1904 Dunajská Streda

FAQ

What was the result of DAC vs Skalica?

The Super Liga match finished DAC 3:2 Skalica. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before DAC vs Skalica?

DAC score 1.80 goals per game on average and Skalica 0.90. The Super Liga average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 50% of DAC's matches and 50% of Skalica's.

What form are DAC and Skalica in?

Over the last 5 games DAC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Skalica 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for DAC vs Skalica?

The statistical background for DAC vs Skalica — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.