South Korea - K League 2DGB ArenaData current as of 06 September 2026

Daegu vs Seongnam: match statistics

Daegu crest
Daegu
3 : 2half-time 1:1
Seongnam crest
Seongnam

Daegu vs Seongnam: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Daegu played Seongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 11 July 2026. Venue: DGB Arena. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Daegu: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Seongnam: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Daegu scores 2.13 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Seongnam scores 0.93 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Daegu 67%, Seongnam 60%. Over 2.5: Daegu 67%, Seongnam 33%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Daegu has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.60. Daegu: 14.5 shots per match, Seongnam: 12.7.

Match halves

Daegu: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.33. Seongnam: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Daegu: 76-90+ (10 goals). Seongnam: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Daegu holds a clear advantage: they scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches (2.8 goals per match) and won 4 of those 5, while Seongnam scored just 3 goals in their last 5 (0.6 per match) and failed to win. At home Daegu averages 2.0 goals per match, 6.25 shots on target and an average xG of 1.93, whereas Seongnam away posts 1.14 goals per match, 3.71 shots on target and xG 1.51. Defensively the hosts conceded 3 goals in their last 5 (0.6 per match) and 1.25 goals at home on average, with 50% clean sheets, while the visitors conceded 6 goals in their last 5 (1.2 per match) and have only 14% clean sheets on the road. Additionally Daegu have no home matches without scoring (0% matches without a goal) and collect an average of 2.6 points per match in their last 5, whereas Seongnam have 29% of away matches without a goal and only 0.6 points per match in their last 5. Based on this I tip a home win, estimating their chances at around 70%, draw 18% and away win 12%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seongnam has BTTS in 71% of matches this season, Daegu 50%, and the league BTTS average is 63%, which already favors a "both teams to score" scenario. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% for both sides, with Daegu averaging 2.8 goals per match over the last 5 (14 goals) while Seongnam scores 0.6 (3 goals) and concedes 1.2 goals per match, increasing the likelihood of mutual scoring. xG data confirms Daegu's attacking pressure: season xG_for 1.68 and recent xG_for 2.1 versus Seongnam season xG_against 1.41 and recent 1.28, meaning Daegu creates more high-quality chances than Seongnam can neutralize. Additionally, Seongnam has only 14% clean sheets this season versus 25% for Daegu and concedes on average 1.14 goals per match, so a clean sheet for either side is unlikely. Considering Seongnam 71% BTTS, Daegu 50%, 60% in the last 5 and the league 63%, I assess BTTS probability at 70% vs 30% and recommend selecting "BTTS - Yes".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for both teams is 1.68 + 1.51 = 3.19, which indicates more than 2.5 expected goals in the fixture. In the last 5 matches Daegu averaged 2.8 goals (14 goals in 5), while Seongnam averaged 0.6 goals (3 goals in 5), totaling 3.4 goals per game — this reinforces the Over scenario. Seasonal indicators are mixed: percentage of Over 2.5 matches is 25% for Daegu and 43% for Seongnam, but the league average for Over 2.5 is 56%, therefore I assess Over 2.5 as moderately likely (~58%). Additionally, BTTS occurs in 50% of home matches and 71% of away matches, and shots on target averages are similar (3.75 vs 3.71), which increases the probability of at least two goals. The strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (high xG 3.19 and 3.4 goals in the last 5), hence the recommendation: Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a draw at Full-Time (X/X). Teams frequently share an early lead at the break — Daegu records a lead at the break of draw in 63% of matches, and Seongnam in 43%, yielding an average of approximately 53% probability of a draw at Half-Time. A Full-Time draw is also a common outcome: Daegu draws 63% of season matches, Seongnam 43%, therefore we assign the X/X outcome the highest weight (29%). Additionally, the low number of first-half goals (Daegu averages 0.38 goals at Half-Time, Seongnam 0.57) and Daegu keeping a clean sheet at the break in 75% of matches support a low-scoring draw.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
DaeguSeongnam
7Shots5
DaeguSeongnam
3Shots on target2
DaeguSeongnam
1.14xG0.81
DaeguSeongnam
4Corners2
DaeguSeongnam
67Dangerous attacks48
DaeguSeongnam
9Fouls10
DaeguSeongnam
2Cards2
DaeguSeongnam

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.13Goals scored / match0.93
DaeguSeongnam
1.33Goals conceded / match1
DaeguSeongnam
54%Average possession57%
DaeguSeongnam
5.87Shots on target / match3.73
DaeguSeongnam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.53Shots per match12.73
DaeguSeongnam
5.87Shots on target3.73
DaeguSeongnam
14.7%Shot conversion7.3%
DaeguSeongnam
54%Possession57%
DaeguSeongnam
1.86xG for1.6
DaeguSeongnam
1.4xG against1.23
DaeguSeongnam

Shooting quality

Daegu: AttackingSeongnam: Balanced
DaeguSeongnam
Accuracy (shots on target)40%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Daegu is 333% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Daegu · 0.6 pts / match - Seongnam

Daegu
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
53% W27% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-3
1.87 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.12Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Seongnam
DLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W53% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-4
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Daegu is 129% better for: goals scored per match.

2.13 goals / match - Daegu · 0.93 goals / match - Seongnam

Seongnam is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Daegu · 1 goals / match - Seongnam

Daegu scoring profile: very strong

Daegu scores in 93% of matches (14 of 15 matches), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

Seongnam scoring profile: strong

Seongnam scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Daegu keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

32Goals scored (season)14
DaeguSeongnam
20Goals conceded (season)15
DaeguSeongnam
3.47Average goals in match1.93
DaeguSeongnam
14Goals scored (last 5)3
DaeguSeongnam
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
DaeguSeongnam

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal60%
DaeguSeongnam
53%2 goals27%
DaeguSeongnam
40%3 goals7%
DaeguSeongnam
20%4 goals0%
DaeguSeongnam

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal80%
DaeguSeongnam
47%2 goals13%
DaeguSeongnam
20%3 goals7%
DaeguSeongnam
0%4 goals0%
DaeguSeongnam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time13%
DaeguSeongnam
13%BTTS in both halves0%
DaeguSeongnam
40%Scored in both halves13%
DaeguSeongnam

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
DaeguSeongnam
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
DaeguSeongnam
60%BTTS - last 560%
DaeguSeongnam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
DaeguSeongnam
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
DaeguSeongnam
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
DaeguSeongnam

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
DaeguSeongnam
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
DaeguSeongnam
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
DaeguSeongnam

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Daegu is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Daegu · 1.33 pts / match - Seongnam

Daegu - half-time state
33% leading47% draw20% trailing
Seongnam - half-time state
27% leading53% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.33
DaeguSeongnam
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.47
DaeguSeongnam
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
DaeguSeongnam
1.4Average goals (1st half)0.87
DaeguSeongnam
60%Clean sheet before half-time67%
DaeguSeongnam
40%No goal before half-time67%
DaeguSeongnam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.73Points per match (2nd half)0.93
DaeguSeongnam
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
DaeguSeongnam
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
DaeguSeongnam
2.07Average goals (2nd half)1.07
DaeguSeongnam
47%Clean sheet after half-time40%
DaeguSeongnam
27%No goal after half-time60%
DaeguSeongnam

Daegu - second-half results

47% W33% R20% P
22
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Seongnam - second-half results

7% W73% R20% P
20
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Daegu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.60
Goals scored / match0.62.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.62.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+3+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Seongnam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Daegu
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
6
2
61-75
10
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Seongnam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
2
16-30
3
4
31-45
2
5
46-60
3
0
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Daegu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
154%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Seongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

DaeguLigaSeongnam
Average goals in match 3.472.78 1.93
Both teams scored 67%62% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%57% 33%
Clean sheets 33%23% 20%
Goal before half-time 67%72% 53%
Goal after half-time 87%76% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.78
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.40
Away goals / match
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DaeguYellow cardKang-min Choi
  2. DaeguGoalJu-Gong Kim
  3. DaeguSubstitutionOn: Matheus Bonadiman SerafinOff: Seung-Min Son
  4. DaeguGoalJae-Moon RyuAssist: Kang-min Choi
  5. DaeguSubstitutionOn: Jong-Mu HanOff: Jae-Moon Ryu
  6. SeongnamRed cardElionay Freitas da Silva
  7. DaeguYellow cardJae-Won Hwang
  8. DaeguSubstitutionOn: Marcus DackersOff: Jae-Won Hwang

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Daegu vs Seongnam?

The K League 2 match finished Daegu 3:2 Seongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Daegu vs Seongnam?

Daegu score 2.13 goals per game on average and Seongnam 0.93. The K League 2 average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Daegu's matches and 60% of Seongnam's.

What form are Daegu and Seongnam in?

Over the last 5 games Daegu have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Seongnam 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Daegu vs Seongnam?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Daegu vs Seongnam: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.