Daegu vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics
Daegu vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Daegu played Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Daegu: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match. Seoul E-Land: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Daegu scores 2.25 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Seoul E-Land scores 1.00 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Daegu 75%, Seoul E-Land 50%. Over 2.5: Daegu 75%, Seoul E-Land 50%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Daegu has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.22. Daegu: 11.3 shots per match, Seoul E-Land: 10.3.
Match halves
Daegu: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.25.
Goals by minute
Daegu: 31-45+ (3 goals). Seoul E-Land: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Daegu have a pronounced home advantage: 100% home wins, 2.5 goals per home match, 6.5 SOT and 65% possession. Their home xG (1.70) vs xG conceded (1.27) indicates they create more clear chances and control matches. Seoul E-Land have not won away, average 0.5 goals, 50% matches without scoring and lower shots. Visitors’ weaker xG (1.07) and higher xG against (1.79) suggest defensive issues and difficulty creating chances. Considering Daegu’s home quality and current form, I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I conclude BTTS - Yes due to Daegu’s strong recent form: 80% BTTS in last 5 and 2.2 goals scored per match in that period. The league has high BTTS rates (66%) and a goals average of 3.06, supporting matches where both teams score. Seoul E-Land has low season scoring (0.5) and last-5 (0.8), but xG_against 1.79 and conceding ~1.2 in last 5 indicate defensive vulnerability. Season CS% for both sides at 50% balances risk, but Daegu’s offensive superiority and form combined with a high-BTTS league tip the scale towards Goal/Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Stats show an offensive edge for Daegu (xG_for 1.36, average 1.5 goals) and relatively high defensive vulnerability for Seoul E-Land (away xG_against 1.79), boosting scoring probability. Daegu averages over 2 goals in the last 5 matches and the league has a high goals average (~3.06), supporting higher-scoring outcomes. Calculated expected goals give ~1.58 for the home side and ~1.09 for the visitors (total ~2.67), suggesting at least two goals. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 with high confidence; Over 2.5 is moderately likely and Over 3.5 has a much lower chance.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics indicate a clear Daegu advantage: higher xG (1.36 vs 1.07), better shot conversion (13% vs 6%) and superior form (last5: dwwwl vs llwld). Daegu dominated half-time metrics this season (leadingAtHTPercentage_home 100%, scoredAVGHT_home 1.0, concededAVGHT_home 0.0) which strongly predisposes them to lead at HT. Seoul E-Land has a zero win percentage this season and low PPG, limiting their likelihood of a second-half turnaround. Minute-by-minute data confirm Daegu often score in minutes 31–45, boosting the chance to lead at HT and hold the result to full-time. On that basis the most reliable signal is 1/1 (Daegu leading HT and winning FT).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Daegu | Seoul E-Land | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 51% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Daegu is 125% better for: last-5 form.
2.25 pts / match - Daegu · 1 pts / match - Seoul E-Land
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Daegu is 125% better for: goals scored per match.
2.25 goals / match - Daegu · 1 goals / match - Seoul E-Land
Seoul E-Land is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.75 goals / match - Daegu · 1.25 goals / match - Seoul E-Land
Daegu scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).
Seoul E-Land scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Daegu keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Daegu
Over / Under - Seoul E-Land
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seoul E-Land is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / match - Daegu · 2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Daegu - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Seoul E-Land - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.75 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.3 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 50% |
| No goal | 25% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 50% |
| No goal | 25% | 75% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Daegu
Seoul E-Land
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Daegu | Liga | Seoul E-Land | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.00 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 62% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 23% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 85% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 67% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Seoul E-LandYellow cardMin-Jae Kang
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Daegu vs Seoul E-Land?
The K League 2 match finished Daegu 1:3 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Daegu vs Seoul E-Land?
Daegu score 2.25 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.00. The K League 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Daegu's matches and 50% of Seoul E-Land's.
What form are Daegu and Seoul E-Land in?
Over the last 5 games Daegu have a 3-0-1 record (2.25 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Daegu vs Seoul E-Land?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Daegu vs Seoul E-Land: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.