Daejeon Citizen vs Gwangju: match statistics
Daejeon Citizen vs Gwangju: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Daejeon Citizen played Gwangju in K League 1 (South Korea). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Venue: Daejeon World Cup Stadium. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Daejeon Citizen: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Gwangju: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Daejeon Citizen scores 1.15 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. Gwangju scores 0.55 and concedes 2.25. League average: 2.33 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Daejeon Citizen 45%, Gwangju 40%. Over 2.5: Daejeon Citizen 35%, Gwangju 50%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 41%.
xG, shots and style
Daejeon Citizen has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.04. Daejeon Citizen: 11.3 shots per match, Gwangju: 8.1.
Match halves
Daejeon Citizen: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.65. Gwangju: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.35.
Goals by minute
Daejeon Citizen: 46-60 (5 goals). Gwangju: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 1: 2.33 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 41%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-1. Average goals 3.25, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a home win. Daejeon holds a clear advantage in chance quality — average home xG 1.55 versus Gwangju’s 1.03 xG on the road, and the hosts average 11.9 shots and 3.4 on target per match compared to 8.33 and 2.11 for the visitors. Defensively the hosts also look stronger: Daejeon concedes 1.4 goals on average at home, while Gwangju concedes 2.67 goals away; this season the visitors have conceded 45 goals versus 23 conceded by the hosts. It should be noted, however, that Daejeon have yet to win at home (0% home wins) and 50% of their home matches end in a draw; in their last five matches the hosts have 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, averaging 0.8 points per game. Gwangju are extremely inefficient on the road — 0.33 goals per away match and 67% of away games without scoring — therefore, given the xG and shot advantage, I rate a home victory as more likely, although a draw remains a realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because both teams show a clear tendency to concede and recent matches more frequently feature goals from both sides. This season Daejeon averages 0.73 goals scored and concedes 1.91 per match, while Gwangju scores 0.33 and concedes 2.67, with clean sheets occurring in only 18% of Daejeon’s games and 11% of Gwangju’s. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% for Daejeon and 80% for Gwangju, and their last-5 averages are 1.2 and 0.8 goals scored respectively, with xG 1.58 vs 1.06, indicating realistic scoring chances for both sides. Seasonal xG for both teams is around 1.05 and 1.03, while opponents allow 2.05 and 1.63 xG, so there are enough shots at goal despite low finishing rates (conversion rate 9% vs 4%). Additionally Gwangju have conceded 45 goals this season and the league BTTS rate is 53%, therefore the scenario of both teams scoring is assessed as more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Over 1.5: Daejeon have 64% of matches season-to-date with more than 1.5 goals, Gwangju 78%, averaging roughly 71% historically >1.5. Combined xG is 1.05+1.03=2.08 xG per match, while defenses concede 2.05 (Daejeon) and 1.63 (Gwangju) xG, indicating a potential for scoring chances; in the last 5 matches combined xG was 1.58+1.06=2.64, and the two teams scored 6 and 4 goals respectively (10 in 5 matches), i.e. 2.0 per match. However, adjust for Gwangju’s poor finishing: season scoring only 0.33 goals per match and a shot conversion rate of 4.0%, while Daejeon have 0.73 goals and 9.0% conversion, so I apply a correction versus raw xG. Weighting xG and actual finishing, I forecast about 1.25 goals for the home side and 1.05 for the visitors (total 2.30), which yields a strong signal for Over 1.5 (76%), a moderate signal against Over 2.5 (48%) and a low probability for Over 3.5 (29%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time I expect a draw: Daejeon are level at the break in 73% of matches and average just 0.27 goals in the first half, while Gwangju manage only 0.11 in that period, favoring a goalless or low-scoring first half. After the break the tempo usually increases — average goals in second halves are 1.55 in Daejeon matches and 1.89 in Gwangju matches, with hosts scoring on average 0.45 after the interval versus 0.22 for visitors, so most goals fall after the 45th minute. Daejeon are also more efficient with chances: shot conversion 9% versus Gwangju’s 4% on similar xG (1.05 vs 1.03), and the visitors concede on average 1.67 goals after the break, which gives the hosts the edge in the second half. Gwangju have not won this season (0% wins), so the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a Daejeon victory after the break (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Daejeon Citizen | Gwangju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Daejeon Citizen is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Daejeon Citizen · 0.6 pts / match - Gwangju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Daejeon Citizen is 109% better for: goals scored per match.
1.15 goals / match - Daejeon Citizen · 0.55 goals / match - Gwangju
Daejeon Citizen is 96% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.15 goals / match - Daejeon Citizen · 2.25 goals / match - Gwangju
Daejeon Citizen scores in 55% of matches (11 of 20 matches), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).
Gwangju scores in 40% of matches (8 of 20 matches), while Daejeon Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Daejeon Citizen
Over / Under — Gwangju
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Daejeon Citizen is 91% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.05 pts / match - Daejeon Citizen · 0.55 pts / match - Gwangju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Daejeon Citizen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gwangju - second-half results
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Daejeon Citizen
Gwangju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Daejeon Citizen | Liga | Gwangju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.30 | 2.33 | ▲ 2.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 51% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 41% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 30% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 64% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 74% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Daejeon Citizen 1 - 2 - 1 Gwangju. Average goals 3.25, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Daejeon Citizen vs Gwangju?
The K League 1 match finished Daejeon Citizen 2:0 Gwangju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Daejeon Citizen and Gwangju?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Daejeon Citizen won 1, Gwangju won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Daejeon Citizen vs Gwangju?
Daejeon Citizen score 1.15 goals per game on average and Gwangju 0.55. The K League 1 average is 2.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Daejeon Citizen's matches and 40% of Gwangju's.
What form are Daejeon Citizen and Gwangju in?
Over the last 5 games Daejeon Citizen have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Gwangju 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Daejeon Citizen vs Gwangju?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Daejeon Citizen vs Gwangju: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


