Dalian Huayi vs Guangzhou E-Power: match statistics
Dalian Huayi vs Guangzhou E-Power: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Dalian Huayi played Guangzhou E-Power in China League One (China). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Dalian Huayi: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Guangzhou E-Power: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Dalian Huayi scores 1.50 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Guangzhou E-Power scores 2.00 and concedes 0.71. League average: 2.32 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Dalian Huayi 83%, Guangzhou E-Power 43%. Over 2.5: Dalian Huayi 67%, Guangzhou E-Power 57%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Guangzhou E-Power has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.52. Dalian Huayi: 11.7 shots per match, Guangzhou E-Power: 15.3.
Match halves
Dalian Huayi: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.50. Guangzhou E-Power: half-time lead 71%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Dalian Huayi: 0-15 (2 goals). Guangzhou E-Power: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.32 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Guangzhou E-Power are clear favorites: they sit 1st in the table with a record of 6 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, while Dalian Huayi have 2 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses. In the last 5 matches Guangzhou have won 4 of 5 and average 2.4 points per game, whereas Dalian average 1.0 point per game with only 1 win in five. Offensively the visitors have scored 14 goals this season (1.67 per away match) versus the hosts’ 9 goals (1.33 at home) and possess a higher finishing efficiency — 14% conversion vs 10% for Dalian. Defensively Guangzhou concede 1.33 goals away, while Dalian concede 1.67 at home; in the last 5 matches the hosts have conceded 8 goals compared to only 3 conceded by Guangzhou, which favors the visitors. Dalian, however, generate higher xG at home (1.74) than the visitors do away (1.41), indicating the hosts create quality chances but finish poorly (10% conversion and home win% 0), therefore I predict a Guangzhou victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal stats are mixed: Dalian Huayi has a seasonal BTTS 25% and 75% clean sheets at home with an average goals conceded of 0.25, while Guangzhou E-Power has a seasonal BTTS 67% and averages 1.67 goals scored. Over the last 5 matches the signals lean toward both sides — Dalian in L5 has BTTS 80% and conceded a total of 8 goals (1.6 per match), and Guangzhou in L5 scored 9 goals (1.8 avg) and has form "lwwww". xG and shots confirm goal potential: home xG_for 1.92 faces away xG_against 1.66, away xG_for 1.41 versus home xG_against 1.15, and shots on target 6.0 vs 4.33 give both teams chances. Considering greater weight to the last 5 matches and the xG/shots signals, I assess BTTS probability at 62% for vs 38% against and recommend a "BTTS - Yes" tip.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The forecast is based on xG and statistics: expected goals are 1.79 for Dalian Huayi and 1.28 for Guangzhou E-Power, totaling 3.07. Dalian Huayi at home averages 2.25 goals with 17.75 shots and an xG of 1.92, while Guangzhou E-Power away has an attacking xG of 1.41 and concedes on average 1.66 xG on the road, so both sides generate goal-scoring opportunities. Although Dalian Huayi have 75% clean sheets at home, Guangzhou E-Power score on average 1.67 goals away and have 67% of away matches with BTTS, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Season Over 2.5 rates are 50% for the home side and 67% for the away side, and in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 occurred in 60% of cases for both teams, confirming a tendency toward at least 3 goals. A Poisson distribution for the total expected 3.07 yields roughly 81% for Over 1.5, 59% for Over 2.5 and 37% for Over 3.5; the strongest and most reliable signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The hosts led at the break in 4 of their 4 matches (100%) and score an average of 1.5 goals by half-time while conceding 0.0, indicating clear first-half dominance. Over 90 minutes Dalian Huayi score an average of 2.25 goals and concede only 0.25, and the home win rate is 100%, strongly supporting a full-time victory. Additionally, the hosts’ xG is 1.92 versus 1.41 for the visitors, and an average of 6.0 shots on target vs 4.33 confirms their offensive superiority and ability to maintain a lead at the break. The visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches (80%), but their half-time goals average 1.0 with 0.33 conceded, while the hosts have 100% clean sheets at half-time (visitors 67%), so a turnaround appears unlikely. Consequently I select the scenario of the hosts leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1) and assign it a 68% probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Dalian Huayi | Guangzhou E-Power | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Guangzhou E-Power is 140% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Dalian Huayi · 2.4 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Guangzhou E-Power is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - Dalian Huayi · 2 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Guangzhou E-Power is 111% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Dalian Huayi · 0.71 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Dalian Huayi scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Guangzhou E-Power keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).
Guangzhou E-Power scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Dalian Huayi keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Dalian Huayi
Over / Under - Guangzhou E-Power
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Guangzhou E-Power is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - Dalian Huayi · 2.43 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Dalian Huayi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Guangzhou E-Power - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 71% of matches and wins 86%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Dalian Huayi
Guangzhou E-Power
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Dalian Huayi | Liga | Guangzhou E-Power | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.32 | ▲ 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 83% | 46% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 49% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 32% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 74% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | • 67% | 68% | ▲ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Dalian Huayi 0 - 1 - 1 Guangzhou E-Power. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Dalian Huayi vs Guangzhou E-Power?
The China League One match finished Dalian Huayi 1:1 Guangzhou E-Power. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Dalian Huayi and Guangzhou E-Power?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Dalian Huayi won 0, Guangzhou E-Power won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Dalian Huayi vs Guangzhou E-Power?
Dalian Huayi score 1.50 goals per game on average and Guangzhou E-Power 2.00. The China League One average is 2.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Dalian Huayi's matches and 43% of Guangzhou E-Power's.
What form are Dalian Huayi and Guangzhou E-Power in?
Over the last 5 games Dalian Huayi have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Guangzhou E-Power 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dalian Huayi vs Guangzhou E-Power?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.