Damash Gilanian vs Fard Alborz: match statistics
Damash Gilanian vs Fard Alborz: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Damash Gilanian played Fard Alborz in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 16 July 2026. Venue: SARDAR JANGAL STADIUM. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Damash Gilanian: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Fard Alborz: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Damash Gilanian scores 0.48 and concedes 1.70 goals per match. Fard Alborz scores 0.73 and concedes 0.45. League average: 1.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Damash Gilanian 42%, Fard Alborz 18%. Over 2.5: Damash Gilanian 33%, Fard Alborz 12%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
xG, shots and style
Fard Alborz has higher xG: 0.85 vs 0.82. Damash Gilanian: 1.6 shots per match, Fard Alborz: 2.8.
Match halves
Damash Gilanian: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.30. Fard Alborz: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.39.
Goals by minute
Damash Gilanian: 76-90+ (8 goals). Fard Alborz: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.58 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fard Alborz is the favorite: they sit 8th in the table versus Damash Gilanian in 18th, and their season record is 10 wins, 15 draws and 8 losses versus the hosts’ 2 wins, 12 draws and 19 losses. The biggest edge is defensively: the visitors concede on average 0.31 goals away, while the hosts concede 1.53 at home, and the visitors’ away clean sheet rate is 69% versus the hosts’ 18%. Recent form over the last 5 matches also favors the visitors — Fard scored 7 goals and won 3 of the last 5, averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas Damash have only 3 goals, 0 wins and 0.4 points per game. The hosts create slightly more chances (6.2 shots and 2.2 on target per home match vs 5.0 and 1.43 for the visitors), but are less efficient (conversion 6% vs 9%) and as many as 53% of their home games end with Damash failing to score. Both teams have similar average xG in their matches (0.79), but the hosts have xG against 1.14 and actually concede 1.53 goals, while the visitors have xG against 1.43 yet concede only 0.31 — this underlines the visitors’ advantage in organization and in preventing opponents from finishing. Based on this I predict an away win; estimated probabilities: 68% away win, 20% draw, 12% home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are low: hosts have BTTS at 29% and visitors only 6%, suggesting that in most matches at least one team keeps a clean sheet. Additionally, clean sheets occur in 53% of home matches and 69% of away matches, and in the league the share of matches without conceding reaches 92% with an average of 1.58 goals per game. Offensive metrics also do not favor Both Teams To Score — xG 0.88 for hosts vs 0.79 for visitors, an average of 2.62 vs 1.43 shots on target and a conversion rate of 14% vs 9%. There is, however, a counter signal from form: in the last 5 matches hosts have conceded an average of 2.2 goals and had BTTS in 60% of fixtures, while visitors averaged 1.4 goals and had BTTS in 40%, which creates moderate risk for both teams scoring. Considering the dominance of seasonal indicators of low BTTS and high clean sheets, I recommend the “No” market as more likely (no 80% vs yes 20%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model predicts a total of 1.67 xG (0.88 for Damash and 0.79 for Fard), indicating a low number of scoring opportunities. Historically both teams rarely exceed 2.5 goals: Damash has 18% of matches over 2.5, Fard only 6% (approx. 12% combined average), while the league shows 22% over 2.5. In the last 5 matches the teams scored a total of 10 goals (3 for Damash and 7 for Fard), an average of 2.0 goals per match, with Damash conceding 11 goals in those five (2.2 per match). A Poisson distribution for total xG=1.67 yields about a 24% chance for Over 2.5 (9% for Over 3.5) and an almost even split at 1.5 (49% vs 51%), therefore the strongest value signal is Under 2.5 (model implies 76% chance for Under and is supported by historical data).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select HT/FT X/X (draw at half-time and draw at full-time) as the strongest scenario because a draw at the break occurs very frequently: home teams were level at half-time in 59% of matches and away teams in 69%. Draws also dominate over the full match — home teams draw 41% of games and away teams 50% — and the league has a high percentage of clean sheets (92%), which limits goal scoring. Half-time goal statistics confirm low effectiveness: home teams average 0.35 goals scored and 0.18 conceded in the first half, away teams average 0.31 scored and 0.25 conceded, and average first-half goals are about 0.53–0.56 per team. Although the away side has better recent form in the last five matches (3 wins, 60%, and an average of 1.8 points), the percentage of games with both teams scoring is low (29% for homes vs 6% for aways), so the numerical analysis points to the highest probability being an HT/FT draw.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Damash Gilanian | Fard Alborz | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 21% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.52 | 0.30 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.45 | 0.78 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fard Alborz is 350% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Damash Gilanian · 1.8 pts / match - Fard Alborz
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fard Alborz is 52% better for: goals scored per match.
0.48 goals / match - Damash Gilanian · 0.73 goals / match - Fard Alborz
Fard Alborz is 278% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.7 goals / match - Damash Gilanian · 0.45 goals / match - Fard Alborz
Damash Gilanian scores in 45% of matches (15 of 33 matches), while Fard Alborz keeps a clean sheet in 61% (20 of 33 matches).
Fard Alborz scores in 42% of matches (14 of 33 matches), while Damash Gilanian keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Damash Gilanian
Over / Under - Fard Alborz
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fard Alborz is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / match - Damash Gilanian · 1.27 pts / match - Fard Alborz
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Damash Gilanian - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 6%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Fard Alborz - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Damash Gilanian
Fard Alborz
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Damash Gilanian | Liga | Fard Alborz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.18 | 1.58 | ▼ 1.18 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 42% | 30% | ▼ 18% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 22% | ▼ 12% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 46% | ▲ 61% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 52% | 46% | ▼ 42% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 57% | ▼ 39% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Damash Gilanian 0 - 1 - 0 Fard Alborz. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Damash Gilanian vs Fard Alborz?
The Azadegan League match finished Damash Gilanian 0:0 Fard Alborz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Damash Gilanian vs Fard Alborz?
Damash Gilanian score 0.48 goals per game on average and Fard Alborz 0.73. The Azadegan League average is 1.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Damash Gilanian's matches and 18% of Fard Alborz's.
What form are Damash Gilanian and Fard Alborz in?
Over the last 5 games Damash Gilanian have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Fard Alborz 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Damash Gilanian vs Fard Alborz?
The statistical background for Damash Gilanian vs Fard Alborz — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


