Iran - Azadegan LeagueSARDAR JANGAL STADIUMData current as of 08 September 2026

Damash Gilanian vs Fard Alborz: match statistics

Damash Gilanian crest
Damash Gilanian
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Fard Alborz crest
Fard Alborz

Damash Gilanian vs Fard Alborz: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Damash Gilanian played Fard Alborz in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 16 July 2026. Venue: SARDAR JANGAL STADIUM. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Damash Gilanian: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Fard Alborz: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Damash Gilanian scores 0.48 and concedes 1.70 goals per match. Fard Alborz scores 0.73 and concedes 0.45. League average: 1.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Damash Gilanian 42%, Fard Alborz 18%. Over 2.5: Damash Gilanian 33%, Fard Alborz 12%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Fard Alborz has higher xG: 0.85 vs 0.82. Damash Gilanian: 1.6 shots per match, Fard Alborz: 2.8.

Match halves

Damash Gilanian: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.30. Fard Alborz: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.39.

Goals by minute

Damash Gilanian: 76-90+ (8 goals). Fard Alborz: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.58 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fard Alborz is the favorite: they sit 8th in the table versus Damash Gilanian in 18th, and their season record is 10 wins, 15 draws and 8 losses versus the hosts’ 2 wins, 12 draws and 19 losses. The biggest edge is defensively: the visitors concede on average 0.31 goals away, while the hosts concede 1.53 at home, and the visitors’ away clean sheet rate is 69% versus the hosts’ 18%. Recent form over the last 5 matches also favors the visitors — Fard scored 7 goals and won 3 of the last 5, averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas Damash have only 3 goals, 0 wins and 0.4 points per game. The hosts create slightly more chances (6.2 shots and 2.2 on target per home match vs 5.0 and 1.43 for the visitors), but are less efficient (conversion 6% vs 9%) and as many as 53% of their home games end with Damash failing to score. Both teams have similar average xG in their matches (0.79), but the hosts have xG against 1.14 and actually concede 1.53 goals, while the visitors have xG against 1.43 yet concede only 0.31 — this underlines the visitors’ advantage in organization and in preventing opponents from finishing. Based on this I predict an away win; estimated probabilities: 68% away win, 20% draw, 12% home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators are low: hosts have BTTS at 29% and visitors only 6%, suggesting that in most matches at least one team keeps a clean sheet. Additionally, clean sheets occur in 53% of home matches and 69% of away matches, and in the league the share of matches without conceding reaches 92% with an average of 1.58 goals per game. Offensive metrics also do not favor Both Teams To Score — xG 0.88 for hosts vs 0.79 for visitors, an average of 2.62 vs 1.43 shots on target and a conversion rate of 14% vs 9%. There is, however, a counter signal from form: in the last 5 matches hosts have conceded an average of 2.2 goals and had BTTS in 60% of fixtures, while visitors averaged 1.4 goals and had BTTS in 40%, which creates moderate risk for both teams scoring. Considering the dominance of seasonal indicators of low BTTS and high clean sheets, I recommend the “No” market as more likely (no 80% vs yes 20%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model predicts a total of 1.67 xG (0.88 for Damash and 0.79 for Fard), indicating a low number of scoring opportunities. Historically both teams rarely exceed 2.5 goals: Damash has 18% of matches over 2.5, Fard only 6% (approx. 12% combined average), while the league shows 22% over 2.5. In the last 5 matches the teams scored a total of 10 goals (3 for Damash and 7 for Fard), an average of 2.0 goals per match, with Damash conceding 11 goals in those five (2.2 per match). A Poisson distribution for total xG=1.67 yields about a 24% chance for Over 2.5 (9% for Over 3.5) and an almost even split at 1.5 (49% vs 51%), therefore the strongest value signal is Under 2.5 (model implies 76% chance for Under and is supported by historical data).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I select HT/FT X/X (draw at half-time and draw at full-time) as the strongest scenario because a draw at the break occurs very frequently: home teams were level at half-time in 59% of matches and away teams in 69%. Draws also dominate over the full match — home teams draw 41% of games and away teams 50% — and the league has a high percentage of clean sheets (92%), which limits goal scoring. Half-time goal statistics confirm low effectiveness: home teams average 0.35 goals scored and 0.18 conceded in the first half, away teams average 0.31 scored and 0.25 conceded, and average first-half goals are about 0.53–0.56 per team. Although the away side has better recent form in the last five matches (3 wins, 60%, and an average of 1.8 points), the percentage of games with both teams scoring is low (29% for homes vs 6% for aways), so the numerical analysis points to the highest probability being an HT/FT draw.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
-1Shots-1
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
-1Shots on target-1
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0xG0
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
-1Corners-1
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0Dangerous attacks0
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
-1Fouls-1
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
-1Cards-1
Damash GilanianFard Alborz

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0.48Goals scored / match0.73
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
1.7Goals conceded / match0.45
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
15%Average possession30%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0.33Shots on target / match0.94
Damash GilanianFard Alborz

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

1.58Shots per match2.82
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0.33Shots on target0.94
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
30.8%Shot conversion25.8%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
15%Possession30%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0.82xG for0.85
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
1.34xG against1.06
Damash GilanianFard Alborz

Shooting quality

Damash Gilanian: Counter-attackingFard Alborz: Counter-attacking
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
Accuracy (shots on target)21%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.520.30
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.450.78

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fard Alborz is 350% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Damash Gilanian · 1.8 pts / match - Fard Alborz

Damash Gilanian
LDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
6% W36% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-12-19
0.55 pts / match · goal difference -40
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-7-8
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 0.93Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Fard Alborz
LWWWL
Season result split
30% W45% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-15-8
1.36 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-8-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fard Alborz is 52% better for: goals scored per match.

0.48 goals / match - Damash Gilanian · 0.73 goals / match - Fard Alborz

Fard Alborz is 278% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.7 goals / match - Damash Gilanian · 0.45 goals / match - Fard Alborz

Damash Gilanian scoring profile: more difficult

Damash Gilanian scores in 45% of matches (15 of 33 matches), while Fard Alborz keeps a clean sheet in 61% (20 of 33 matches).

Fard Alborz scoring profile: mixed

Fard Alborz scores in 42% of matches (14 of 33 matches), while Damash Gilanian keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).

16Goals scored (season)24
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
56Goals conceded (season)15
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
2.18Average goals in match1.18
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
3Goals scored (last 5)7
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
11Goals conceded (last 5)4
Damash GilanianFard Alborz

How often they score at least...

45%1 goal42%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
3%2 goals18%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0%3 goals3%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0%4 goals3%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal39%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
39%2 goals6%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
21%3 goals0%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
15%4 goals0%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

30%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time6%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
3%Scored in both halves15%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS9%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
60%BTTS - last 540%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time42%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time9%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time39%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fard Alborz is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / match - Damash Gilanian · 1.27 pts / match - Fard Alborz

Damash Gilanian - half-time state
3% leading58% draw39% trailing
Fard Alborz - half-time state
21% leading64% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per match (1st half)1.27
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0.18Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0.79Average goals (1st half)0.55
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
52%Clean sheet before half-time79%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
82%No goal before half-time73%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz

After half-time (2nd half)

0.76Points per match (2nd half)1.3
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
0.3Goals scored (2nd half)0.39
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.24
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
1.3Average goals (2nd half)0.64
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
36%Clean sheet after half-time82%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz
70%No goal after half-time70%
Damash GilanianFard Alborz

Damash Gilanian - second-half results

12% W39% R48% P
22
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-23
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 6%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fard Alborz - second-half results

21% W67% R12% P
42
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Damash Gilanian - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-4-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Fard Alborz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Damash Gilanian
ScoredConceded
1
9
0-15
1
5
16-30
4
9
31-45
2
9
46-60
0
9
61-75
8
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Fard Alborz
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
6
2
16-30
5
4
31-45
2
2
46-60
5
4
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.68
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
19%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
32%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Damash Gilanian

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
246%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Fard Alborz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-26.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Damash GilanianLigaFard Alborz
Average goals in match 2.181.58 1.18
Both teams scored 42%30% 18%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%22% 12%
Clean sheets 18%46% 61%
Goal before half-time 52%46% 42%
Goal after half-time 76%57% 39%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.58
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Damash Gilanian 0 - 1 - 0 Fard Alborz. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Damash Gilanian vs Fard Alborz?

The Azadegan League match finished Damash Gilanian 0:0 Fard Alborz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Damash Gilanian vs Fard Alborz?

Damash Gilanian score 0.48 goals per game on average and Fard Alborz 0.73. The Azadegan League average is 1.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Damash Gilanian's matches and 18% of Fard Alborz's.

What form are Damash Gilanian and Fard Alborz in?

Over the last 5 games Damash Gilanian have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Fard Alborz 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Damash Gilanian vs Fard Alborz?

The statistical background for Damash Gilanian vs Fard Alborz — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.