Damash Gilanian vs Navad Urmia: match statistics
Statistical analysis points to a very evenly matched encounter between two weak teams in the bottom part of the table. Damash Gilanian has not won a single match this season and has a disastrous attacking efficiency at home (0.4 goals per game, 60% of matches without scoring), however Navad Urmia displays identical away form with an average of just 0.4 goals per match on the road and a 60% loss rate. Both teams have identical form in their last 5 matches (0.4 points per game) and the same record (2 draws, 3 defeats). The key factor arguing for a draw is that Damash has a 50% draw rate at home, and Navad a 30% draw rate away, which combined with both teams' low efficiency makes a points split the most probable scenario. The slight advantage of the hosts stems only from playing in front of their own crowd and a marginally better xG (0.73 vs 1.05 for the visitors), but their zero win percentage at home significantly limits the chances of a victory.
Damash Gilanian vs Navad Urmia: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Damash Gilanian played Navad Urmia in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 8 February 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Damash Gilanian: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Navad Urmia: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Damash Gilanian scores 0.45 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Navad Urmia scores 0.68 and concedes 0.84. League average: 1.55 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Damash Gilanian 45%, Navad Urmia 42%. Over 2.5: Damash Gilanian 30%, Navad Urmia 16%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 22%.
xG, shots and style
Navad Urmia has higher xG: 1.05 vs 0.88. Damash Gilanian: 1.6 shots per match, Navad Urmia: 2.0.
Match halves
Damash Gilanian: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.30. Navad Urmia: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.42.
Goals by minute
Damash Gilanian: 76-90+ (6 goals). Navad Urmia: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.55 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 22%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis points to a very evenly matched encounter between two weak teams in the bottom part of the table. Damash Gilanian has not won a single match this season and has a disastrous attacking efficiency at home (0.4 goals per game, 60% of matches without scoring), however Navad Urmia displays identical away form with an average of just 0.4 goals per match on the road and a 60% loss rate. Both teams have identical form in their last 5 matches (0.4 points per game) and the same record (2 draws, 3 defeats). The key factor arguing for a draw is that Damash has a 50% draw rate at home, and Navad a 30% draw rate away, which combined with both teams' low efficiency makes a points split the most probable scenario. The slight advantage of the hosts stems only from playing in front of their own crowd and a marginally better xG (0.73 vs 1.05 for the visitors), but their zero win percentage at home significantly limits the chances of a victory.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Damash Gilanian | Navad Urmia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 19% | 13% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.57 | 0.53 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.50 | 2.62 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Navad Urmia is 51% better for: goals scored per match.
0.45 goals / match - Damash Gilanian · 0.68 goals / match - Navad Urmia
Navad Urmia is 73% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.45 goals / match - Damash Gilanian · 0.84 goals / match - Navad Urmia
Damash Gilanian scores in 45% of matches (9 of 20 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).
Navad Urmia scores in 58% of matches (11 of 19 matches), while Damash Gilanian keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Damash Gilanian
Over / Under - Navad Urmia
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Navad Urmia is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.6 pts / match - Damash Gilanian · 1 pts / match - Navad Urmia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Damash Gilanian - second-half results
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Navad Urmia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 16%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Damash Gilanian
Navad Urmia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Damash Gilanian | Liga | Navad Urmia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 1.90 | 1.55 | • 1.53 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 45% | 34% | ▲ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 30% | 22% | ▼ 16% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 44% | ▼ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 65% | 58% | ▼ 53% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Damash GilanianGoalAli Ramezani Garalkuei
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Damash Gilanian 0 - 1 - 0 Navad Urmia. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Damash Gilanian vs Navad Urmia?
The Azadegan League match finished Damash Gilanian 2:1 Navad Urmia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Damash Gilanian vs Navad Urmia?
Damash Gilanian score 0.45 goals per game on average and Navad Urmia 0.68. The Azadegan League average is 1.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Damash Gilanian's matches and 42% of Navad Urmia's.
What form are Damash Gilanian and Navad Urmia in?
Over the last 5 games Damash Gilanian have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Navad Urmia 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Damash Gilanian vs Navad Urmia?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Damash Gilanian vs Navad Urmia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.