Danubio vs Racing: match statistics
Danubio vs Racing: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Danubio played Racing in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Jardines del Hipódromo. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Danubio: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Racing: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Danubio scores 0.92 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Racing scores 1.29 and concedes 0.79. League average: 2.36 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Danubio 50%, Racing 50%. Over 2.5: Danubio 42%, Racing 29%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
Racing has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.26. Danubio: 9.8 shots per match, Racing: 13.0.
Match halves
Danubio: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.42. Racing: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Danubio: 0-15 (5 goals). Racing: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.36 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Racing are 3rd in the league, while Danubio sit 8th. Over the course of the season, the visitors have recorded 12 wins and only 3 defeats, compared with the hosts’ 4 wins and 9 losses. Current form also favors Racing: they have collected 8 points and scored 6 goals in their last five matches, whereas Danubio have failed to win any of those games, earning just 3 points and scoring 2 goals. Away from home, Racing create slightly better chances, posting an average xG of 1.59 compared with Danubio’s 1.51 at home, and they also average 12.91 shots per match against 11.45 for the hosts. Both defenses have been similarly effective, with each side conceding an average of 0.91 goals per game in the relevant conditions, which increases the likelihood of a draw. However, Danubio draw as many as 55% of their home matches and fail to score in 36% of them, so Racing should have the better chance of securing a narrow victory, although a stalemate remains a realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as Danubio have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, while both teams scored in only 20% of those fixtures. Racing have recently conceded an average of 0.8 goals per match, whereas Danubio have had a very solid defence over the course of the season, keeping a clean sheet in 54% of matches and conceding only 0.69 goals on average. Danubio’s current xG stands at 1.09, clearly below their season figure of 1.58, confirming a decline in the hosts’ attacking efficiency. Racing have slightly stronger arguments for scoring, with 1.2 goals and an xG of 1.33 across their last five matches, but this does not offset the high risk of Danubio, who are struggling for form, failing to find the net. The teams’ seasonal BTTS rates—46% for Danubio and 55% for Racing—are relatively balanced, but the hosts’ current form shifts the forecast towards a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is the low share of matches with at least 4 goals: just 15% for Danubio and 18% for Racing, meaning that 85% and 82% of their respective matches finished below 3.5 goals. Danubio’s form further reduces the hosts’ attacking potential, as they have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game. During this period, both teams conceded 0.8 goals per match, while Over 2.5 goals landed in only 20% of cases for each side. Racing’s recent attacking numbers are slightly better, with an average of 1.2 goals and an xG of 1.33; however, Danubio’s solid defense, conceding 0.69 goals per game over the season and keeping a clean sheet in 54% of matches, limits the prospect of a high-scoring game. The projected total of 1.81 goals points to value on Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and at full-time, as Racing were level at the break in 64% of their matches, compared with 38% for Danubio. Danubio do have a very solid pre-half-time defence, conceding an average of just 0.31 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 77% of first halves, which limits the visitors’ chances of taking an early lead. At the same time, the hosts are in poorer form: they have scored only 0.4 goals per match over their last five games, have not won any of them, and were level at half-time in as many as 60%. Racing have recently averaged 1.2 goals and 1.6 points per match, but their defence, together with Danubio’s defensive solidity, points towards a cautious and evenly balanced game. In addition, both teams record a high proportion of draws across the competition—38% for Danubio and 36% for Racing—and their last five matches have produced an average of just 0.6 goals after half-time for each side.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Danubio | Racing | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Racing is 167% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Danubio · 1.6 pts / match - Racing
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Racing is 40% better for: goals scored per match.
0.92 goals / match - Danubio · 1.29 goals / match - Racing
Racing is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.29 goals / match - Danubio · 0.79 goals / match - Racing
Danubio scores in 58% of matches (14 of 24 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 42% (10 of 24 matches).
Racing scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Danubio keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Danubio
Over / Under - Racing
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Racing is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / match - Danubio · 1.63 pts / match - Racing
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Danubio - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Racing - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Danubio
Racing
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Danubio | Liga | Racing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.21 | 2.36 | ▼ 2.08 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 50% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 45% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 29% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 66% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▼ 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- RacingYellow cardThiago Fernández
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Danubio 1 - 1 - 2 Racing. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Danubio vs Racing?
The Primera División match finished Danubio 0:0 Racing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Danubio and Racing?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Danubio won 1, Racing won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Danubio vs Racing?
Danubio score 0.92 goals per game on average and Racing 1.29. The Primera División average is 2.36 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Danubio's matches and 50% of Racing's.
What form are Danubio and Racing in?
Over the last 5 games Danubio have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Racing 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Danubio vs Racing?
The statistical background for Danubio vs Racing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


