Uruguay - Primera DivisiónEstadio Jardines del HipódromoData current as of 31 August 2026

Danubio vs Racing: match statistics

Danubio crest
Danubio
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Racing crest
Racing

Danubio vs Racing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Danubio played Racing in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Jardines del Hipódromo. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Danubio: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Racing: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Danubio scores 0.92 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Racing scores 1.29 and concedes 0.79. League average: 2.36 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Danubio 50%, Racing 50%. Over 2.5: Danubio 42%, Racing 29%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Racing has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.26. Danubio: 9.8 shots per match, Racing: 13.0.

Match halves

Danubio: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.42. Racing: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Danubio: 0-15 (5 goals). Racing: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.36 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Racing are 3rd in the league, while Danubio sit 8th. Over the course of the season, the visitors have recorded 12 wins and only 3 defeats, compared with the hosts’ 4 wins and 9 losses. Current form also favors Racing: they have collected 8 points and scored 6 goals in their last five matches, whereas Danubio have failed to win any of those games, earning just 3 points and scoring 2 goals. Away from home, Racing create slightly better chances, posting an average xG of 1.59 compared with Danubio’s 1.51 at home, and they also average 12.91 shots per match against 11.45 for the hosts. Both defenses have been similarly effective, with each side conceding an average of 0.91 goals per game in the relevant conditions, which increases the likelihood of a draw. However, Danubio draw as many as 55% of their home matches and fail to score in 36% of them, so Racing should have the better chance of securing a narrow victory, although a stalemate remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as Danubio have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, while both teams scored in only 20% of those fixtures. Racing have recently conceded an average of 0.8 goals per match, whereas Danubio have had a very solid defence over the course of the season, keeping a clean sheet in 54% of matches and conceding only 0.69 goals on average. Danubio’s current xG stands at 1.09, clearly below their season figure of 1.58, confirming a decline in the hosts’ attacking efficiency. Racing have slightly stronger arguments for scoring, with 1.2 goals and an xG of 1.33 across their last five matches, but this does not offset the high risk of Danubio, who are struggling for form, failing to find the net. The teams’ seasonal BTTS rates—46% for Danubio and 55% for Racing—are relatively balanced, but the hosts’ current form shifts the forecast towards a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is the low share of matches with at least 4 goals: just 15% for Danubio and 18% for Racing, meaning that 85% and 82% of their respective matches finished below 3.5 goals. Danubio’s form further reduces the hosts’ attacking potential, as they have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game. During this period, both teams conceded 0.8 goals per match, while Over 2.5 goals landed in only 20% of cases for each side. Racing’s recent attacking numbers are slightly better, with an average of 1.2 goals and an xG of 1.33; however, Danubio’s solid defense, conceding 0.69 goals per game over the season and keeping a clean sheet in 54% of matches, limits the prospect of a high-scoring game. The projected total of 1.81 goals points to value on Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and at full-time, as Racing were level at the break in 64% of their matches, compared with 38% for Danubio. Danubio do have a very solid pre-half-time defence, conceding an average of just 0.31 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 77% of first halves, which limits the visitors’ chances of taking an early lead. At the same time, the hosts are in poorer form: they have scored only 0.4 goals per match over their last five games, have not won any of them, and were level at half-time in as many as 60%. Racing have recently averaged 1.2 goals and 1.6 points per match, but their defence, together with Danubio’s defensive solidity, points towards a cautious and evenly balanced game. In addition, both teams record a high proportion of draws across the competition—38% for Danubio and 36% for Racing—and their last five matches have produced an average of just 0.6 goals after half-time for each side.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
DanubioRacing
8Shots9
DanubioRacing
0Shots on target4
DanubioRacing
0.88xG1.21
DanubioRacing
7Corners4
DanubioRacing
50Dangerous attacks49
DanubioRacing
13Fouls14
DanubioRacing
3Cards2
DanubioRacing

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.92Goals scored / match1.29
DanubioRacing
1.29Goals conceded / match0.79
DanubioRacing
52%Average possession49%
DanubioRacing
3.54Shots on target / match3.96
DanubioRacing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.79Shots per match12.96
DanubioRacing
3.54Shots on target3.96
DanubioRacing
9.4%Shot conversion10%
DanubioRacing
52%Possession49%
DanubioRacing
1.26xG for1.58
DanubioRacing
1.32xG against1.07
DanubioRacing

Shooting quality

Danubio: BalancedRacing: Balanced
DanubioRacing
Accuracy (shots on target)36%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Racing is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Danubio · 1.6 pts / match - Racing

Danubio
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W46% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-11-9
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-6-3
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Racing
DLWDW
Season result split
50% W38% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-3
1.88 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-2
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Racing is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

0.92 goals / match - Danubio · 1.29 goals / match - Racing

Racing is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Danubio · 0.79 goals / match - Racing

Danubio scoring profile: mixed

Danubio scores in 58% of matches (14 of 24 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 42% (10 of 24 matches).

Racing scoring profile: very strong

Racing scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Danubio keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 matches).

22Goals scored (season)31
DanubioRacing
31Goals conceded (season)19
DanubioRacing
2.21Average goals in match2.08
DanubioRacing
2Goals scored (last 5)6
DanubioRacing
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
DanubioRacing

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal83%
DanubioRacing
25%2 goals33%
DanubioRacing
4%3 goals8%
DanubioRacing
4%4 goals4%
DanubioRacing

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal58%
DanubioRacing
38%2 goals13%
DanubioRacing
13%3 goals4%
DanubioRacing
4%4 goals4%
DanubioRacing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time25%
DanubioRacing
4%BTTS in both halves4%
DanubioRacing
13%Scored in both halves17%
DanubioRacing

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
DanubioRacing
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
DanubioRacing
20%BTTS - last 540%
DanubioRacing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
DanubioRacing
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
DanubioRacing
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
DanubioRacing

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time58%
DanubioRacing
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
DanubioRacing
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
DanubioRacing

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Racing is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Danubio · 1.63 pts / match - Racing

Danubio - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing
Racing - half-time state
38% leading50% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.63
DanubioRacing
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.67
DanubioRacing
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
DanubioRacing
0.88Average goals (1st half)1.08
DanubioRacing
67%Clean sheet before half-time67%
DanubioRacing
58%No goal before half-time42%
DanubioRacing

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)1.38
DanubioRacing
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
DanubioRacing
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
DanubioRacing
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1
DanubioRacing
38%Clean sheet after half-time71%
DanubioRacing
71%No goal after half-time58%
DanubioRacing

Danubio - second-half results

17% W38% R46% P
33
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding59%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Racing - second-half results

29% W50% R21% P
39
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Danubio - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Racing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Danubio
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Racing
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
6
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
6
3
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Danubio

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

DanubioLigaRacing
Average goals in match 2.212.36 2.08
Both teams scored 50%50% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%45% 29%
Clean sheets 25%29% 42%
Goal before half-time 63%66% 67%
Goal after half-time 71%73% 58%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.36
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
1.06
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RacingYellow cardThiago Fernández
  2. DanubioSubstitutionOn: Axel Gastón Montaña MenéndezOff: Iván Rossi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Danubio 1 - 1 - 2 Racing. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Racing
4 : 0
Danubio
Racing Club de Montevideo
1 : 2
Danubio Fútbol Club
Danubio Fútbol Club
1 : 2
Racing Club de Montevideo
Danubio Fútbol Club
0 : 0
Racing Club de Montevideo

FAQ

What was the result of Danubio vs Racing?

The Primera División match finished Danubio 0:0 Racing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Danubio and Racing?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Danubio won 1, Racing won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Danubio vs Racing?

Danubio score 0.92 goals per game on average and Racing 1.29. The Primera División average is 2.36 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Danubio's matches and 50% of Racing's.

What form are Danubio and Racing in?

Over the last 5 games Danubio have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Racing 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Danubio vs Racing?

The statistical background for Danubio vs Racing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.