De Graafschap vs Cambuur: match statistics
De Graafschap vs Cambuur: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
De Graafschap played Cambuur in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 17 April 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
De Graafschap: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Cambuur: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
De Graafschap scores 1.97 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Cambuur scores 2.00 and concedes 1.22. League average: 3.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: De Graafschap 72%, Cambuur 64%. Over 2.5: De Graafschap 67%, Cambuur 56%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 64%.
xG, shots and style
De Graafschap has higher xG: 2.02 vs 1.74. De Graafschap: 17.7 shots per match, Cambuur: 14.6.
Match halves
De Graafschap: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.08. Cambuur: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.11.
Goals by minute
De Graafschap: 76-90+ (19 goals). Cambuur: 76-90+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eerste Divisie: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 64%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
De Graafschap has a home advantage: in home matches they average 2.06 goals and generate xG 2.28 per game, while Cambuur away averages 1.78 goals and xG 1.58. The hosts create significantly more chances — 20.39 average shots and 8.33 shots on target at home versus 13.28 shots and 5.39 on target for Cambuur away — although the visitors are more efficient (13% conversion vs 10% for the hosts). In the last five matches De Graafschap scored 13 goals and averages 1.6 points per game, whereas Cambuur scored 9 goals, averages 1.0 points per game and conceded as many as 11 goals (De Graafschap conceded 7). On the other hand Cambuur’s season-long record is stronger: 22 wins vs 17, 72 goals scored vs 71, and only 44 conceded vs 56 for De Graafschap, which indicates greater defensive stability over the long term. Considering De Graafschap’s superiority in chance creation and superior recent form, I forecast a home win; estimated probabilities: 50% for 1, 25% for draw, 25% for away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are strong: De Graafschap has 67% of matches with both teams scoring, Cambuur 61%, and the league average is 62%, providing a baseline signal for BTTS - Yes. Both teams regularly score and concede — De Graafschap averages 2.22 goals for and concedes 1.11 per match, Cambuur scores 1.78 and concedes 1.33, and clean sheets occur in only 33% and 28% of matches respectively. In the last 5 matches the trend is even stronger for BTTS: Cambuur has 80% BTTS and concedes 2.2 goals on average, De Graafschap has 60% BTTS and concedes 1.4, indicating a high likelihood of mutual scoring in current form. Additionally, xG and shots metrics confirm chance creation — xG_for 1.89 vs 1.58 and xG_against 1.31 vs 1.45, plus average shots on target 6.5 vs 5.39 with conversion 14% vs 13%, so both sides have realistic goal-scoring potential. Considering seasonal 67/61% BTTS, Cambuur’s recent 80% and the league average of 3.21 goals per game, I assess BTTS probability at 72% (No 28%) and recommend a "yes" bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
De Graafschap averages 2.22 goals scored per match, Cambuur 1.78, and the league average is 3.21 goals per game, indicating a generally high-scoring environment. xG values corroborate the offensive bias: De Graafschap’s attacking xG is 1.89 versus Cambuur’s 1.58, with xG against at 1.31 (De Graafschap) and 1.45 (Cambuur); from these figures I estimate 1.67 goals for the home side and 1.45 for the visitors (total 3.12). Seasonally Over 1.5 occurred in 83% of home matches and 72% of away matches, so Over 1.5 gives the strongest signal (≈85%); Over 2.5 is 56%/56% season-to-date and De Graafschap have had Over 2.5 in 80% of their last 5 games, yielding a moderate probability for Over 2.5 (≈58%). Over 3.5 is less likely: season rates are 44% for De Graafschap and 33% for Cambuur, and only 17% of matches saw either team score 3+ goals, so I assess Under 3.5 at roughly 65%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
De Graafschap holds an offensive advantage: on average 2.22 goals per match versus Cambuur's 1.78, xG 1.89 vs 1.58 and 6.5 shots on target vs 5.39, indicating superior chance creation. The hosts are also stronger after the break — they score on average 1.39 goals in the second half versus Cambuur's 0.83 and have accumulated 37 points in second halves compared to the visitors' 26 points, which supports maintaining or extending a lead. Although season-long first-half averages show Cambuur scores slightly more (0.94 vs 0.83), in the last five matches De Graafschap led at the break in 60% (3 of 5) while Cambuur did so in only 20% (1 of 5); the hosts also scored 7 goals in the 0–15 minute window versus Cambuur's 2, increasing the likelihood of a lead at the break. Full-time statistics also favor the hosts — De Graafschap win 67% of home matches versus Cambuur's 56% away win rate, with shot conversion rates of 14% vs 13%, so the most reliable scenario is 1/1 (lead at half-time and home win at full-time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| De Graafschap | Cambuur | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
De Graafschap is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - De Graafschap · 1 pts / match - Cambuur
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cambuur is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.56 goals / match - De Graafschap · 1.22 goals / match - Cambuur
De Graafschap scores in 86% of matches (31 of 36 matches), while Cambuur keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).
Cambuur scores in 92% of matches (33 of 36 matches), while De Graafschap keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - De Graafschap
Over / Under - Cambuur
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
De Graafschap is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / match - De Graafschap · 1.61 pts / match - Cambuur
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
De Graafschap - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cambuur - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
De Graafschap
Cambuur
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).
Teams vs league
| De Graafschap | Liga | Cambuur | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.53 | 3.21 | • 3.22 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 72% | 62% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 64% | ▼ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 21% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 77% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 85% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: De Graafschap 0 - 0 - 1 Cambuur. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of De Graafschap vs Cambuur?
The Eerste Divisie match finished De Graafschap 3:1 Cambuur. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before De Graafschap vs Cambuur?
De Graafschap score 1.97 goals per game on average and Cambuur 2.00. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 72% of De Graafschap's matches and 64% of Cambuur's.
What form are De Graafschap and Cambuur in?
Over the last 5 games De Graafschap have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Cambuur 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for De Graafschap vs Cambuur?
The statistical background for De Graafschap vs Cambuur — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


