Hungary - NB INagyerdei StadionData current as of 15 October 2026

Debrecen vs ETO: match statistics

Debrecen crest
Debrecen
1 : 1half-time 0:1
ETO crest
ETO

Debrecen vs ETO: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Debrecen played ETO in NB I (Hungary). The match was played on 16 August 2026. Venue: Nagyerdei Stadion. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Debrecen: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match. ETO: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Debrecen scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. ETO scores 3.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.70 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Debrecen 33%, ETO 50%. Over 2.5: Debrecen 33%, ETO 100%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 70%.

xG, shots and style

ETO has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.41. Debrecen: 12.0 shots per match, ETO: 11.5.

Match halves

Debrecen: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67. ETO: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 2.50.

Goals by minute

Debrecen: 0-15 (1 goals). ETO: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB I: 3.70 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 70%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

ETO are 4th, while Debrecen sit 9th, and over their last five matches the visitors have collected 8 points compared with 4 for the hosts. ETO have scored 13 goals during this period, whereas Debrecen have managed just 3, while their season-long goal differences stand at 6:2 and 3:6, respectively. Away from home, the visitors create more high-quality chances, recording an xG of 1.61 from 13 shots and 5 shots on target per match, compared with Debrecen’s xG of 1.25 and 3 shots on target at home. The hosts average just 0.5 goals at their own stadium and have failed to score in 50% of such matches, whereas ETO have yet to draw a blank away from home. A draw remains a realistic outcome, as ETO’s only away match so far ended in a share of the points, but the visitors’ attacking superiority and current scoring form point towards an ETO victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A scenario in which one of the teams fails to score is slightly more likely, primarily due to Debrecen’s poor recent finishing: they have averaged just 0.6 goals across their last five matches, with BTTS occurring in only 20% of those games. ETO have shown a clearly stronger attack, averaging 2.6 goals in their last five appearances, so the main risk to the pick is an away goal. At the same time, Debrecen have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their home matches so far, while ETO have failed to keep a single one, highlighting highly divergent but small-sample seasonal data. Although Debrecen’s xG over their last five matches stands at 1.44, and ETO have allowed opponents an xG of 2.01, the hosts’ low actual goal output suggests that they are the team most likely to fail to score. The BTTS - No pick is not stronger than the league average of 59%, but Debrecen’s scoring form reduces their chances in this particular match.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total number of goals is 2.85. ETO have scored 13 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.6 per game, while Debrecen conceded an average of 1.8 goals over the same period. The hosts have recently scored just 0.6 goals per game, but ETO’s defence allowed opponents an average of 2.01 xG, compared with 1.44 xG created by Debrecen. The case for a higher-scoring game is further supported by the league average of 3.88 goals per match and 71% of games producing at least three goals, although the hosts’ weaker attacking efficiency limits confidence in Over 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

ETO are showing clearly better current form: they have averaged 2.6 goals and collected 1.6 points per match over their last five games, while Debrecen have scored just 0.6 goals and earned 0.8 points per game. The hosts were trailing at half-time in three of their last five matches, whereas ETO led after 45 minutes in two of five, averaging 0.8 first-half goals compared with Debrecen’s 0.2. The visitors’ advantage remains strong after the interval, as they have averaged 1.8 goals, with a second-half goal difference of +6 across their last five matches. Debrecen have lost three of their last five games and conceded an average of 1.8 goals per match, making the most likely HT/FT scenario ETO taking the lead at the break and holding it until full-time: 2/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
DebrecenETO
16Shots6
DebrecenETO
6Shots on target1
DebrecenETO
1.84xG0.71
DebrecenETO
13Corners5
DebrecenETO
58Dangerous attacks35
DebrecenETO
14Fouls7
DebrecenETO
3Cards2
DebrecenETO

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match3
DebrecenETO
2Goals conceded / match1
DebrecenETO
56%Average possession49%
DebrecenETO
3.67Shots on target / match5
DebrecenETO

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match11.5
DebrecenETO
3.67Shots on target5
DebrecenETO
8.3%Shot conversion26.1%
DebrecenETO
56%Possession49%
DebrecenETO
1.41xG for1.47
DebrecenETO
1.26xG against1.77
DebrecenETO

Shooting quality

Debrecen: BalancedETO: Efficient finishing
DebrecenETO
Accuracy (shots on target)31%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.60

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

ETO is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Debrecen · 2 pts / match - ETO

Debrecen
LLW
Season result split
33% W0% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%
ETO
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ETO is 200% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Debrecen · 3 goals / match - ETO

ETO is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Debrecen · 1 goals / match - ETO

Debrecen scoring profile: mixed

Debrecen scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while ETO keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

ETO scoring profile: very strong

ETO scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Debrecen keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

3Goals scored (season)6
DebrecenETO
6Goals conceded (season)2
DebrecenETO
3Average goals in match4
DebrecenETO
3Goals scored (last 5)6
DebrecenETO
6Goals conceded (last 5)2
DebrecenETO

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
DebrecenETO
33%2 goals100%
DebrecenETO
0%3 goals50%
DebrecenETO
0%4 goals50%
DebrecenETO

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal50%
DebrecenETO
67%2 goals50%
DebrecenETO
33%3 goals0%
DebrecenETO
33%4 goals0%
DebrecenETO

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time0%
DebrecenETO
33%BTTS in both halves0%
DebrecenETO
33%Scored in both halves50%
DebrecenETO

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
DebrecenETO
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
DebrecenETO
33%BTTS - last 550%
DebrecenETO

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
DebrecenETO
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
DebrecenETO
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
DebrecenETO

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
DebrecenETO
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
DebrecenETO
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time100%
DebrecenETO

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ETO is 506% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.33 pts / match - Debrecen · 2 pts / match - ETO

Debrecen - half-time state
0% leading33% draw67% trailing
ETO - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.33Points per match (1st half)2
DebrecenETO
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.5
DebrecenETO
1.33Goals conceded (1st half)0
DebrecenETO
1.67Average goals (1st half)0.5
DebrecenETO
33%Clean sheet before half-time100%
DebrecenETO
67%No goal before half-time50%
DebrecenETO

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)2
DebrecenETO
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)2.5
DebrecenETO
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1
DebrecenETO
1.33Average goals (2nd half)3.5
DebrecenETO
67%Clean sheet after half-time50%
DebrecenETO
33%No goal after half-time0%
DebrecenETO

Debrecen - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.33
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.7

Defence stays stable across the full match.

ETO - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Debrecen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.331.33
Goals scored / match0.30.7
Goals conceded / match1.30.7
Average goals in match1.71.3
1 goal67%67%
2 goals67%33%
3 goals33%33%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal67%33%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 33% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 1
ETO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match0.52.5
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.53.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%100%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Debrecen
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

ETO
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 2.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Debrecen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
45%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

ETO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+2.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.77
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
200%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+2.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

DebrecenLigaETO
Average goals in match▼ 3.003.70▲ 4.00
Both teams scored▼ 33%65%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%70%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▲ 33%20%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 67%75%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%85%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.70
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
2.20
Home goals / match
1.50
Away goals / match
+47%
Home attack advantage
+32%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
10%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
75%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DebrecenSubstitutionOn: Dávid PataiOff: Sain Balázs Csaba
  2. DebrecenYellow cardBlaž Bošković
  3. DebrecenYellow cardBalázs Dzsudzsák
  4. ETOYellow cardMiljan Krpić
  5. DebrecenSubstitutionOn: Gergő TerczaOff: Blaž Bošković
  6. ETOSubstitutionOn: Nfansu NjieOff: Ádám Décsy
  7. ETOYellow cardBarnabás Bíró

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Debrecen 0 - 3 - 0 ETO. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Debrecen vs ETO?

The NB I match finished Debrecen 1:1 ETO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Debrecen and ETO?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Debrecen won 0, ETO won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Debrecen vs ETO?

Debrecen score 1.00 goals per game on average and ETO 3.00. The NB I average is 3.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Debrecen's matches and 50% of ETO's.

What form are Debrecen and ETO in?

Over the last 5 games Debrecen have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and ETO 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Debrecen vs ETO?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.