Slovenia - 2. SNLIgrišče Ivan GregoričData current as of 31 August 2026

Dekani vs Jesenice: match statistics

Dekani crest
Dekani
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Jesenice crest
Jesenice

Dekani vs Jesenice: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dekani played Jesenice in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 21 August 2026. Venue: Igrišče Ivan Gregorič. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Dekani: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Jesenice: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dekani scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Jesenice scores 0.50 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.50 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dekani 0%, Jesenice 50%. Over 2.5: Dekani 50%, Jesenice 50%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Jesenice has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.01. Dekani: 6.5 shots per match, Jesenice: 13.0.

Match halves

Dekani: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Jesenice: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Dekani: 16-30 (1 goals). Jesenice: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.50 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Dekani sit 5th, while Jesenice are only 13th, and the difference is also reflected in their current form. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 14 goals, whereas the visitors have suffered 3 defeats, scored just 5 goals and conceded 9. At home, Dekani won their only match so far 3:0, registering 3 shots on target from 7 attempts and keeping a clean sheet. Their average xG stands at 1.22, while opponents allow their rivals chances worth 1.03 xG, suggesting that the hosts have the edge in chance creation. Jesenice have scored just 1 goal and conceded 4 in two matches this season, making a Dekani victory the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The latest form of both teams points to goals at both ends, as BTTS occurred in 60% of their last five matches. Dekani averaged 2.8 goals scored during this period, while Jesenice averaged 1.0, conceding 1.4 and 1.8 goals per match respectively. The hosts have not kept a clean sheet in the competition, and their average xG against stands at 1.20, giving the visitors a realistic route to scoring. Jesenice have recently generated xG of 1.55, higher than Dekani’s 1.42, although the visitors’ weaker run of three defeats in five matches slightly reduces confidence in the pick. Despite the league BTTS rate standing at just 38%, the current offensive and defensive indicators of both teams provide stronger support for a scenario in which each side scores. Therefore, the recommended market is BTTS - Yes (Goal/Goal), rather than BTTS - No, which means that at least one team fails to score and does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Dekani’s last five matches produced an average of 4.2 goals, with the team scoring 2.8 and conceding 1.4 per game. Jesenic’s matches over the same period averaged 2.8 goals, with the visitors scoring 1.0 and conceding 1.8 per match. Their attacking potential is also reflected in the xG figures: 1.42 for Dekani and 1.55 for Jesenic across their last five appearances, while both defenses allowed 1.20 and 1.69 xG, respectively. The Over 2.5 goals line is supported by the data, as more than 2.5 goals were scored in 80% of Dekani’s and 60% of Jesenic’s last five matches; however, the limited seasonal sample increases uncertainty around higher goal lines. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 3.00 goals and both teams’ defensive vulnerability clearly support at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Dekani are showing clearly better current form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 2.8 goals and won 60% of their games, while Jesenice have scored 1.0 goal on average and lost 60% of their matches. The home side also have the edge in second halves, averaging 1.2 goals, conceding just 0.2 and winning 60% of those periods in this sample; after the break, the visitors have scored only 0.2 goals and lost 60% of their second halves. In the opening 45 minutes, Dekani averaged 1.6 goals compared with Jesenice’s 0.8, and at least two goals were scored before half-time in 80% of their recent matches. Although Jesenice led at the break in 60% of their last matches, their poor finishes and average of 1.8 goals conceded per game suggest that the home side could establish an early advantage and maintain it until the final whistle. The most likely scenario is therefore Dekani leading at half-time and securing the win in the full match: 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
DekaniJesenice
16Shots8
DekaniJesenice
3Shots on target4
DekaniJesenice
1.65xG1.01
DekaniJesenice
11Corners1
DekaniJesenice
59Dangerous attacks29
DekaniJesenice
12Fouls17
DekaniJesenice
0Cards0
DekaniJesenice

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match0.5
DekaniJesenice
0.5Goals conceded / match2
DekaniJesenice
55%Average possession55%
DekaniJesenice
1.5Shots on target / match4.5
DekaniJesenice

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.5Shots per match13
DekaniJesenice
1.5Shots on target4.5
DekaniJesenice
23.1%Shot conversion3.8%
DekaniJesenice
55%Possession55%
DekaniJesenice
1.01xG for1.69
DekaniJesenice
1.09xG against1.51
DekaniJesenice

Shooting quality

Dekani: Efficient finishingJesenice: Balanced
DekaniJesenice
Accuracy (shots on target)23%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.000.11

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dekani is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / match - Dekani · 0.5 pts / match - Jesenice

Dekani
WL
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.01Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%
Jesenice
LD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dekani is 200% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Dekani · 0.5 goals / match - Jesenice

Dekani is 300% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.5 goals / match - Dekani · 2 goals / match - Jesenice

Dekani scoring profile: very strong

Dekani scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Jesenice keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Jesenice scoring profile: mixed

Jesenice scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

3Goals scored (season)1
DekaniJesenice
1Goals conceded (season)4
DekaniJesenice
2Average goals in match2.5
DekaniJesenice
3Goals scored (last 5)1
DekaniJesenice
1Goals conceded (last 5)4
DekaniJesenice

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal50%
DekaniJesenice
50%2 goals0%
DekaniJesenice
50%3 goals0%
DekaniJesenice
0%4 goals0%
DekaniJesenice

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
DekaniJesenice
0%2 goals50%
DekaniJesenice
0%3 goals50%
DekaniJesenice
0%4 goals0%
DekaniJesenice

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
DekaniJesenice
0%BTTS in both halves0%
DekaniJesenice
50%Scored in both halves0%
DekaniJesenice

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
DekaniJesenice
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
DekaniJesenice
0%BTTS - last 550%
DekaniJesenice

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
DekaniJesenice
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
DekaniJesenice
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
DekaniJesenice

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
DekaniJesenice
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
DekaniJesenice
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
DekaniJesenice

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dekani - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
Jesenice - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.5
DekaniJesenice
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
DekaniJesenice
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1
DekaniJesenice
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.5
DekaniJesenice
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
DekaniJesenice
50%No goal before half-time50%
DekaniJesenice

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)0
DekaniJesenice
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0
DekaniJesenice
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1
DekaniJesenice
0.5Average goals (2nd half)1
DekaniJesenice
100%Clean sheet after half-time0%
DekaniJesenice
50%No goal after half-time100%
DekaniJesenice

Dekani - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Jesenice - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dekani - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.502.00
Goals scored / match1.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.0
Average goals in match1.50.5
1 goal100%50%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Jesenice - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.500.00
Goals scored / match0.50.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.51.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal50%100%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dekani
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Jesenice
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+56%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dekani

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
42%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Jesenice

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
42%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
153%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

DekaniLigaJesenice
Average goals in match 2.002.50 2.50
Both teams scored 0%38% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%56% 50%
Clean sheets 50%34% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%69% 100%
Goal after half-time 50%88% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.50
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JeseniceGoalEdvin Krupić
  2. JeseniceGoalEdvin Krupić

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Dekani 1 - 1 - 0 Jesenice. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

NK Jadran Dekani
3 : 0
NK Jesenice
NK Jesenice
2 : 2
NK Jadran Dekani

FAQ

What was the result of Dekani vs Jesenice?

The 2. SNL match finished Dekani 0:2 Jesenice. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Dekani and Jesenice?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Dekani won 1, Jesenice won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Dekani vs Jesenice?

Dekani score 1.50 goals per game on average and Jesenice 0.50. The 2. SNL average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Dekani's matches and 50% of Jesenice's.

What form are Dekani and Jesenice in?

Over the last 5 games Dekani have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Jesenice 0-1-1 (0.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dekani vs Jesenice?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Dekani vs Jesenice: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.