Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado: match statistics
Delta Putra Sidoarjo exhibits significantly better form and stats on their home turf. The hosts have won 43% of their home matches this season, scoring an average of 1.57 goals while conceding just 1.0 per game. Their average xG of 1.94 in home fixtures indicates solid offensive potential. Kendal Tornado has dramatic away statistics – 100% losses in away matches, with zero goals scored and zero shots on target registered in such games. The class difference between the two teams is immense, which, combined with home advantage, gives Delta Putra Sidoarjo a very high chance of triumph. The only risk factor is the hosts' weaker form in the last five matches, but the visitors' complete helplessness on the road tips the scales in favor of Delta Putra Sidoarjo.
Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Delta Putra Sidoarjo played Kendal Tornado in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match was played on 11 January 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Delta Putra Sidoarjo: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Kendal Tornado: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match.
Goal statistics
Delta Putra Sidoarjo scores 1.29 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Kendal Tornado scores 1.50 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Delta Putra Sidoarjo 43%, Kendal Tornado 50%. Over 2.5: Delta Putra Sidoarjo 29%, Kendal Tornado 50%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Kendal Tornado has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.51. Delta Putra Sidoarjo: 12.2 shots per match, Kendal Tornado: 8.3.
Match halves
Delta Putra Sidoarjo: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.57. Kendal Tornado: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.25.
Goals by minute
Delta Putra Sidoarjo: 31-45+ (6 goals). Kendal Tornado: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 2: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Delta Putra Sidoarjo exhibits significantly better form and stats on their home turf. The hosts have won 43% of their home matches this season, scoring an average of 1.57 goals while conceding just 1.0 per game. Their average xG of 1.94 in home fixtures indicates solid offensive potential. Kendal Tornado has dramatic away statistics – 100% losses in away matches, with zero goals scored and zero shots on target registered in such games. The class difference between the two teams is immense, which, combined with home advantage, gives Delta Putra Sidoarjo a very high chance of triumph. The only risk factor is the hosts' weaker form in the last five matches, but the visitors' complete helplessness on the road tips the scales in favor of Delta Putra Sidoarjo.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Delta Putra Sidoarjo | Kendal Tornado | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 52% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kendal Tornado is 119% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Delta Putra Sidoarjo · 1.75 pts / match - Kendal Tornado
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kendal Tornado is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.29 goals / match - Delta Putra Sidoarjo · 1.5 goals / match - Kendal Tornado
Kendal Tornado is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Delta Putra Sidoarjo · 0.75 goals / match - Kendal Tornado
Delta Putra Sidoarjo scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while Kendal Tornado keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
Kendal Tornado scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Delta Putra Sidoarjo keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Delta Putra Sidoarjo
Over / Under - Kendal Tornado
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Delta Putra Sidoarjo is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.57 pts / match - Delta Putra Sidoarjo · 1.5 pts / match - Kendal Tornado
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Delta Putra Sidoarjo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kendal Tornado - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.50 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.3 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 25% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 25% |
| No goal | 75% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Delta Putra Sidoarjo
Kendal Tornado
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| Delta Putra Sidoarjo | Liga | Kendal Tornado | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.21 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 47% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 44% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | • 29% | 30% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 68% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado?
The Liga 2 match finished Delta Putra Sidoarjo 3:1 Kendal Tornado. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado?
Delta Putra Sidoarjo score 1.29 goals per game on average and Kendal Tornado 1.50. The Liga 2 average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Delta Putra Sidoarjo's matches and 50% of Kendal Tornado's.
What form are Delta Putra Sidoarjo and Kendal Tornado in?
Over the last 5 games Delta Putra Sidoarjo have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Kendal Tornado 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado?
The statistical background for Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.