India - I-LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Dempo vs Aizawl: match statistics

Dempo crest
Dempo
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Aizawl crest
Aizawl

Dempo vs Aizawl: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dempo played Aizawl in I-League (India). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Dempo: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Aizawl: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dempo scores 1.43 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Aizawl scores 1.71 and concedes 1.86. League average: 2.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dempo 71%, Aizawl 86%. Over 2.5: Dempo 71%, Aizawl 57%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Dempo has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.36. Dempo: 11.1 shots per match, Aizawl: 10.0.

Match halves

Dempo: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.71. Aizawl: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.29.

Goals by minute

Dempo: 0-15 (2 goals). Aizawl: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

I-League: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorite is Dempo: hosts score an average of 2.0 goals per home game with an average xG of 1.73, while Aizawl scores 1.33 goals away with an xG of 1.41. Dempo also have the advantage in chance quality and efficiency — 5.33 shots on target per match and 23% conversion versus the visitors' 3.67 shots on target and 11% conversion. Defensively the difference is significant: Aizawl concedes on average 2.0 goals away with an xG against of 2.24, whereas Dempo concede 1.0 at home with an xG against of 0.95, which increases the hosts' chances of winning. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored a similar number of goals (Dempo 7, Aizawl 8), but the visitors have 0% away wins and a high draw rate of 67%, so a draw remains a realistic scenario.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistics strongly favor BTTS - Yes: this season Dempo have 75% of matches with both teams scoring, Aizawl 100%, and the league BTTS rate is 66%. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% of Dempo’s games and 80% of Aizawl’s, with average goals scored 1.4 (Dempo) vs 1.6 (Aizawl) and conceded 1.6 vs 2.2. Aizawl attempts more shots (11.67 vs 8.75) but has lower conversion (11% vs 23%) and concedes 2.24 xG per season, while Dempo creates 1.32 xG and concedes 1.24 xG, which indicates realistic scoring chances for both sides. Neither team has kept a clean sheet this season (0% for both) and season totals are 10/12 (Dempo goals for/goals against) and 12/13 (Aizawl), so a goalless draw is unlikely. Based on this, I recommend BTTS = Yes at 82% vs 18%, because the cumulative seasonal and recent signals (75%+100% and 60%+80%) clearly support both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Dempo scores an average of 2.0 goals at home, Aizawl averages 1.33 goals away, and both teams score in 75% of Dempo’s matches and 100% of Aizawl’s matches. xG analysis shows Dempo has xG_for 1.32 while Aizawl concedes xG_against 2.24, translating to an expected ~1.78 goals for the home side; Aizawl has xG_for 1.41 versus the home side’s xG_against 1.24, yielding ~1.33 expected goals for the visitors and a total of ~3.11 goals. Dempo records 75% of matches Over 2.5 goals this season, Aizawl 33%, and Over 2.5 occurred in 60% of the last 5 fixtures, so I assign a high probability to Over 2.5 (~72%). Although Dempo has 75% of matches >3.5, Aizawl only 33% and the projected xG=3.11 limits the chance of Over 3.5 to about 42%, therefore the most certain and strongest signal from the data is the bet Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back HT/FT X/1 (draw at half-time, home win) because Dempo shows a clear advantage in the final outcome despite frequent half-time draws. Dempo averages 2.0 goals per match versus Aizawl’s 1.33 and has a 50% win rate this season, while Aizawl has a 0% win rate in the provided seasonal data and 67% draws, indicating the visitors are more likely to draw than to win. A half-time draw is more probable — Dempo averages 0.5 goals by half-time and Aizawl 0.33, and Dempo has been level at the break in 75% of matches — whereas the hosts are stronger after half-time: on average 1.5 goals in the second half and 3 goals in minutes 61–75 versus 1.0 and 0 for the visitors. Additionally, Dempo’s shot conversion is 23% versus Aizawl’s 11%, and the visitors concede 2.24 xG against them compared with 1.24 xG against Dempo, which increases the hosts’ chance of securing the result after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
DempoAizawl
14Shots11
DempoAizawl
6Shots on target3
DempoAizawl
1.64xG1.3
DempoAizawl
9Corners6
DempoAizawl
47Dangerous attacks56
DempoAizawl
2Fouls3
DempoAizawl
1Cards1
DempoAizawl

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.43Goals scored / match1.71
DempoAizawl
1.71Goals conceded / match1.86
DempoAizawl
47%Average possession51%
DempoAizawl
4.71Shots on target / match4.14
DempoAizawl

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.14Shots per match10
DempoAizawl
4.71Shots on target4.14
DempoAizawl
12.8%Shot conversion17.1%
DempoAizawl
47%Possession51%
DempoAizawl
1.66xG for1.36
DempoAizawl
1.51xG against1.67
DempoAizawl

Shooting quality

Dempo: Counter-attackingAizawl: Efficient finishing
DempoAizawl
Accuracy (shots on target)42%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dempo
DLLDW
Season result split
14% W43% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-3
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 at home
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Aizawl
DLWLD
Season result split
29% W43% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-2
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 away
0-2-1
DLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Aizawl is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.43 goals / match - Dempo · 1.71 goals / match - Aizawl

Dempo is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.71 goals / match - Dempo · 1.86 goals / match - Aizawl

Dempo scoring profile: very strong

Dempo scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Aizawl keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 matches).

Aizawl scoring profile: very strong

Aizawl scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Dempo keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

10Goals scored (season)12
DempoAizawl
12Goals conceded (season)13
DempoAizawl
3.14Average goals in match3.57
DempoAizawl
7Goals scored (last 5)8
DempoAizawl
8Goals conceded (last 5)11
DempoAizawl

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal86%
DempoAizawl
43%2 goals57%
DempoAizawl
14%3 goals29%
DempoAizawl
0%4 goals0%
DempoAizawl

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal100%
DempoAizawl
71%2 goals57%
DempoAizawl
14%3 goals14%
DempoAizawl
0%4 goals14%
DempoAizawl

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

43%BTTS at half-time29%
DempoAizawl
14%BTTS in both halves14%
DempoAizawl
43%Scored in both halves29%
DempoAizawl

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
DempoAizawl
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
DempoAizawl
60%BTTS - last 580%
DempoAizawl

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
DempoAizawl
71%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
DempoAizawl
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
DempoAizawl

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
DempoAizawl
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
DempoAizawl
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
DempoAizawl

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Aizawl is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.71 pts / match - Dempo · 0.86 pts / match - Aizawl

Dempo - half-time state
14% leading29% draw57% trailing
Aizawl - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.71Points per match (1st half)0.86
DempoAizawl
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.43
DempoAizawl
1.14Goals conceded (1st half)1.14
DempoAizawl
1.86Average goals (1st half)1.57
DempoAizawl
14%Clean sheet before half-time29%
DempoAizawl
43%No goal before half-time57%
DempoAizawl

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per match (2nd half)1.86
DempoAizawl
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)1.29
DempoAizawl
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
DempoAizawl
1.29Average goals (2nd half)2
DempoAizawl
43%Clean sheet after half-time43%
DempoAizawl
29%No goal after half-time29%
DempoAizawl

Dempo - second-half results

29% W57% R14% P
5
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Aizawl - second-half results

57% W14% R29% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dempo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Aizawl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.402.00
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-6+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dempo
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
4
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
3
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Aizawl
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.35
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
125%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
79%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dempo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Aizawl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).

Teams vs league

DempoLigaAizawl
Average goals in match 3.142.69 3.57
Both teams scored 71%64% 86%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%44% 57%
Clean sheets 14%21% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%67% 86%
Goal after half-time 86%89% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.69
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DempoYellow cardPruthvesh Pednekar
  2. AizawlYellow cardTimur Talipov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Dempo 1 - 1 - 0 Aizawl. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Dempo SC
5 : 2
Aizawl FC
Aizawl FC
0 : 0
Dempo SC

FAQ

What was the result of Dempo vs Aizawl?

The I-League match finished Dempo 3:0 Aizawl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Dempo and Aizawl?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Dempo won 1, Aizawl won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Dempo vs Aizawl?

Dempo score 1.43 goals per game on average and Aizawl 1.71. The I-League average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Dempo's matches and 86% of Aizawl's.

What form are Dempo and Aizawl in?

Over the last 5 games Dempo have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Aizawl 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dempo vs Aizawl?

The statistical background for Dempo vs Aizawl — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.