Dempo vs Namdhari: match statistics
Dempo vs Namdhari: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Dempo played Namdhari in I-League (India). The match was played on 2 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Dempo: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Namdhari: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Dempo scores 1.20 and concedes 2.20 goals per match. Namdhari scores 1.20 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.57 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Dempo 80%, Namdhari 80%. Over 2.5: Dempo 80%, Namdhari 20%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 43%.
xG, shots and style
Dempo has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.42. Dempo: 13.6 shots per match, Namdhari: 12.0.
Match halves
Dempo: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.80. Namdhari: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Dempo: 31-45+ (2 goals). Namdhari: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
I-League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 43%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1); Dempo has a clear advantage in chance creation: on average 16 shots and 9 shots on target per home match versus 10 shots and 3.75 on target per away match for Namdhari. This translates into chance quality — Dempo records average xG of 2.12 at home and scores 2.0 goals per game, while Namdhari posts 1.26 xG and 1.25 goals per away match. Nevertheless the visitors show better recent form: Namdhari in the last 5 matches have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, averaging 1.2 points per game, whereas Dempo have 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses with an average of 0.4 points per game. Defensively there are discrepancies — Dempo concede 2.0 goals on average at home, but their xG against is only 0.82, while Namdhari concede 1.25 goals away with xG against of 2.04, which suggests Dempo concede more goals than xG indicates and Namdhari defend better than xG predicts. Considering Dempo’s substantial superiority in number and quality of chances despite worse form, I propose a probability distribution of 50%/30%/20% (home/draw/away).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong argument for BTTS is that Dempo has a season BTTS of 100%, Namdhari 75%, and both teams have 80% BTTS in their last 5 matches; the league average BTTS is 69% and the average of these key indicators is around 81%. xG values confirm goal-mouth pressure: Dempo generates 2.07 xG versus 2.04 xG conceded by Namdhari, and Namdhari has 1.26 xG versus 1.39 xG conceded by Dempo, indicating both teams create chances. Shot statistics show 20 attempts and 6 on target for Dempo against 10 attempts and 3.75 on target for Namdhari; despite Dempo’s lower conversion (5% vs 13%) both sides have realistic opportunities. Additionally, Dempo has no clean sheets this season (0% CS), Namdhari has only 25% CS, and in the last 5 matches Dempo conceded on average 2.2 goals versus 1.2 conceded by Namdhari, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. As a result I recommend BTTS - Yes with an estimated 81% vs 19% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
An xG-based model indicates expected goals of 2.06 for Dempo (xG_for 2.07 vs xG_against Namdhari 2.04 → average 2.06) and 1.32 for Namdhari (xG_for 1.26 vs xG_against hosts 1.39 → average 1.32), totaling approximately 3.38 goals. With a mean of 3.38 and a Poisson distribution, the probability of Over 1.5 is ~85%, Over 2.5 ~66%, and Over 3.5 ~44%. Additionally, Dempo averages 20 shots and 6 on target per match with a low conversion rate of 5%, and both teams show high BTTS rates: hosts 100% and away 75%, which increases the likelihood of at least two goals in the fixture. Offsetting factors are Dempo’s seasonal metrics (seasonOver25 0%) and low conversion of chances, limiting the probability of a very high score above 3.5. Overall the strongest and most reliable signal from the data is Over 1.5 (high concordance: hosts 100% and away 75% plus expected 3.38 goals), therefore I recommend taking the Over 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest first-half signal is that Dempo were trailing at the break in 100% of their matches (trailingAtHTPercentage_home = 100.0) and have averaged 0.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded by half-time (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.0 vs concededAVGHT_home = 1.0), so an HT lead for the visitors is very likely. However, over the full match Dempo register higher xG and more attempts: xG_for_avg_home = 2.07 versus 1.26 for Namdhari, on average 20 shots and 6 on target for the home side compared to 10 and 3.75 for the away side, indicating the hosts have the potential to stage a turnaround after the break. Second-half statistics support this possibility — Dempo score on average 1.0 goal in the second half and concede none (scored_2hg_avg_home = 1.0, conceded_2hg_avg_home = 0.0, wins_2hg_percentage_home = 100.0), so an equalizer after half-time is realistic. Additionally, Dempo have a 100% draw rate this season (drawPercentage_home = 100.0), and both teams frequently score in matches (seasonBTTSPercentage_home = 100.0 vs away = 75.0), which further favors a full-time draw. In light of these figures I select the best HT/FT pick as 2/X (Namdhari leading at half-time, draw at full-time) as the most probable, with lower chances for 2/2 or the occasional turnaround to 2/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Dempo | Namdhari | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Namdhari is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Dempo · 1.2 pts / match - Namdhari
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Namdhari is 83% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.2 goals / match - Dempo · 1.2 goals / match - Namdhari
Dempo scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Namdhari keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
Namdhari scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Dempo keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Dempo
Over / Under - Namdhari
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Namdhari is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.2 pts / match - Dempo · 0.8 pts / match - Namdhari
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Dempo - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Namdhari - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Dempo
Namdhari
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).
Teams vs league
| Dempo | Liga | Namdhari | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.40 | 2.57 | ▼ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 64% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 43% | ▼ 20% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 21% | • 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 68% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 89% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Dempo 1 - 1 - 0 Namdhari. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Dempo vs Namdhari?
The I-League match finished Dempo 1:1 Namdhari. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Dempo and Namdhari?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Dempo won 1, Namdhari won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Dempo vs Namdhari?
Dempo score 1.20 goals per game on average and Namdhari 1.20. The I-League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Dempo's matches and 80% of Namdhari's.
What form are Dempo and Namdhari in?
Over the last 5 games Dempo have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Namdhari 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dempo vs Namdhari?
The statistical background for Dempo vs Namdhari — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.