United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 23 July 2026

Detroit City FC vs Charleston Battery: match statistics

145%(2.84)
X30%(3.10)
225%(2.45)

Detroit City FC is displaying impressive home form with a 100% win rate (1 match, 1 win) and has conceded zero goals at their stadium this season. The hosts demonstrate high offensive efficiency with a 20% shot conversion rate and an average of 3 goals per game at home, backed by a perfect 100% clean sheet record. Charleston Battery has solid overall form (4 wins in their last 5 matches), but the complete lack of any away match statistical data this season is a significant limitation in assessing their capabilities on the road. Detroit holds the mental edge playing in front of their home crowd, supported by concrete statistics confirming their effectiveness, which gives them a higher probability of winning. I anticipate a close encounter where the hosts will leverage their home advantage, although the visitors' strong overall form could potentially lead to a draw.

Detroit City FC vs Charleston Battery: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Detroit City FC play Charleston Battery in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 28 March 2026 at 21:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Detroit City FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Charleston Battery: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Detroit City FC scores 1.53 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Charleston Battery scores 1.94 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Detroit City FC 53%, Charleston Battery 50%. Over 2.5: Detroit City FC 53%, Charleston Battery 56%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Detroit City FC has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.61. Detroit City FC: 14.1 shots per match, Charleston Battery: 13.1.

Match halves

Detroit City FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00. Charleston Battery: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Detroit City FC: 76-90+ (7 goals). Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 1-2-2. Average goals 2.80, BTTS 60%.

Match description

Detroit City FC is displaying impressive home form with a 100% win rate (1 match, 1 win) and has conceded zero goals at their stadium this season. The hosts demonstrate high offensive efficiency with a 20% shot conversion rate and an average of 3 goals per game at home, backed by a perfect 100% clean sheet record. Charleston Battery has solid overall form (4 wins in their last 5 matches), but the complete lack of any away match statistical data this season is a significant limitation in assessing their capabilities on the road. Detroit holds the mental edge playing in front of their home crowd, supported by concrete statistics confirming their effectiveness, which gives them a higher probability of winning. I anticipate a close encounter where the hosts will leverage their home advantage, although the visitors' strong overall form could potentially lead to a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
12Shots4
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
3Shots on target2
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
1.42xG0.71
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
8Corners6
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
62Dangerous attacks42
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
16Fouls12
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
1Cards2
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
1.53Goals scored / match1.94
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
0.93Goals conceded / match1.38
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
53%Average possession56%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
4.87Shots on target / match5.44
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.13Shots per match13.06
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
4.87Shots on target5.44
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
10.8%Shot conversion14.8%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
53%Possession56%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
1.64xG for1.61
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
1.26xG against1.27
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery

Shooting quality

Detroit City FC: AttackingCharleston Battery: Efficient finishing
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
Accuracy (shots on target)34%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Detroit City FC
LDWWW
Season result split
53% W20% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-4
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Charleston Battery
WWWLD
Season result split
50% W19% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-5
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 27% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - Detroit City FC · 1.94 goals / match - Charleston Battery

Detroit City FC is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.93 goals / match - Detroit City FC · 1.38 goals / match - Charleston Battery

Detroit City FC scoring profile: very strong

Detroit City FC scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

Charleston Battery scoring profile: strong

Charleston Battery scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Detroit City FC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

23Goals scored (season)31
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
14Goals conceded (season)22
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
2.47Average goals in match3.31
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
11Goals scored (last 5)15
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal69%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
40%2 goals56%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
13%3 goals31%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
7%4 goals25%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal81%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
33%2 goals38%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
0%3 goals13%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
0%4 goals6%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 16 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time13%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
7%BTTS in both halves6%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
27%Scored in both halves38%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
60%BTTS - last 580%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charleston Battery is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Detroit City FC · 1.69 pts / match - Charleston Battery

Detroit City FC - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing
Charleston Battery - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.69
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.94
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
1.07Average goals (1st half)1.38
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
53%Clean sheet before half-time69%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
67%No goal before half-time56%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.56
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.94
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
67%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery
27%No goal after half-time38%
Detroit City FCCharleston Battery

Detroit City FC - second-half results

53% W40% R7% P
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding265%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Charleston Battery - second-half results

44% W25% R31% P
27
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Detroit City FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+6+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Detroit City FC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.89
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Detroit City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Detroit City FCLigaCharleston Battery
Average goals in match 2.472.79 3.31
Both teams scored 53%58% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%52% 56%
Clean sheets 40%26% 19%
Goal before half-time 60%67% 63%
Goal after half-time 73%80% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Detroit City FC 1 - 2 - 2 Charleston Battery. Average goals 2.80, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Charleston Battery
2 : 0
Detroit City FC
Charleston Battery
1 : 1
Detroit City FC
Detroit City FC
1 : 3
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
2 : 2
Detroit City FC
Detroit City FC
2 : 0
Charleston Battery

FAQ

What was the result of Detroit City FC vs Charleston Battery?

The USL Championship match finished Detroit City FC 1:0 Charleston Battery. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Detroit City FC and Charleston Battery?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Detroit City FC won 1, Charleston Battery won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Detroit City FC vs Charleston Battery?

Detroit City FC score 1.53 goals per game on average and Charleston Battery 1.94. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Detroit City FC's matches and 50% of Charleston Battery's.

What form are Detroit City FC and Charleston Battery in?

Over the last 5 games Detroit City FC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Charleston Battery 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Detroit City FC vs Charleston Battery?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.