United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 18 October 2026

Detroit City FC vs Rhode Island: match statistics

Detroit City FC crest
Detroit City FC
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Rhode Island crest
Rhode Island

Detroit City FC vs Rhode Island: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Detroit City FC played Rhode Island in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Detroit City FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Rhode Island: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Detroit City FC scores 1.22 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. Rhode Island scores 1.50 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Detroit City FC 41%, Rhode Island 54%. Over 2.5: Detroit City FC 37%, Rhode Island 46%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Rhode Island has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.48. Detroit City FC: 12.4 shots per match, Rhode Island: 15.2.

Match halves

Detroit City FC: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.81. Rhode Island: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.96.

Goals by minute

Detroit City FC: 76-90+ (10 goals). Rhode Island: 16-30 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-1. Average goals 1.40, BTTS 20%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Detroit City FC are the favourites: they have won 64% of their home matches, while Rhode Island have lost 62% of their away games. The hosts’ biggest advantage lies in defence—they concede an average of 0.36 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 64% of matches, compared with the 1.38 goals Rhode Island concede on the road. However, Rhode Island can pose a threat, averaging 1.67 xG away from home compared with Detroit’s 1.55 xG at home, and registering 5.69 shots on target per match against the hosts’ 3.93. Detroit also have the edge in their last five matches: three wins, one draw and just two goals conceded, while Rhode Island have won three times but conceded five goals. Given the hosts’ solid defence and the fact that Rhode Island have failed to score in 38% of their away matches, a Detroit win is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Detroit have seen BTTS in 62% of their matches, but both teams scored in only one of their last 5 games, while the hosts conceded an average of just 0.4 goals. Rhode Island failed to score in 38% of their league matches, and Detroit’s 38% clean-sheet rate further increases the risk of the visitors drawing a blank. On the other hand, the hosts average 1.62 goals scored, while Rhode Island concede 1.38, making it less likely that Detroit will fail to score. Although the visitors’ attacking xG is 1.67, their season BTTS rate is 46%, and Detroit’s recent defensive form points to a slight edge for BTTS - No. This means at least one team is expected not to score; it does not necessarily mean a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been exceeded in 69% of both teams’ matches this season. Detroit concede an average of just 0.85 goals and have let in only 2 goals across their last five matches, limiting Rhode Island’s scoring potential. The hosts do average 1.62 goals with an xG of 1.83, but their average has dropped to 1.0 goals over their last five matches. Rhode Island concede an average of 1.38 goals, so one or two goals from Detroit are plausible, but the projected total of 2.30 goals still gives a clear edge to Under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: Detroit City were level at the break in 62% of their matches, compared with 46% for Rhode Island. However, the visitors led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, so an early advantage for them cannot be ruled out. The case for a home win is supported by second-half performance: Detroit City score an average of 1.15 goals and concede 0.46, while Rhode Island score 0.77 and concede 1.00. Detroit City also have the stronger season record overall, averaging 1.77 points per match compared with the visitors’ 1.15, and conceding 0.85 goals per match compared with 1.38. Therefore, a half-time draw followed by a Detroit City win is the strongest HT/FT scenario, although Rhode Island’s recent strong first-half performances add uncertainty to this selection.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Detroit City FCRhode Island
8Shots9
Detroit City FCRhode Island
1Shots on target1
Detroit City FCRhode Island
0.8xG1.01
Detroit City FCRhode Island
2Corners2
Detroit City FCRhode Island
30Dangerous attacks51
Detroit City FCRhode Island
9Fouls24
Detroit City FCRhode Island
2Cards5
Detroit City FCRhode Island

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Detroit City FCRhode Island
1.22Goals scored / match1.5
Detroit City FCRhode Island
0.74Goals conceded / match1.12
Detroit City FCRhode Island
52%Average possession49%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
3.96Shots on target / match5.42
Detroit City FCRhode Island

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.44Shots per match15.15
Detroit City FCRhode Island
3.96Shots on target5.42
Detroit City FCRhode Island
9.8%Shot conversion9.9%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
52%Possession49%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
1.48xG for1.75
Detroit City FCRhode Island
1.19xG against1.24
Detroit City FCRhode Island

Shooting quality

Detroit City FC: BalancedRhode Island: Attacking
Detroit City FCRhode Island
Accuracy (shots on target)32%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Detroit City FC is 11% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Detroit City FC · 1.8 pts / match - Rhode Island

Detroit City FC
LWDWW
Season result split
48% W30% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-8-6
1.74 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Rhode Island
WLLWW
Season result split
42% W19% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-10
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-0-8
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rhode Island is 23% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - Detroit City FC · 1.5 goals / match - Rhode Island

Detroit City FC is 51% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.74 goals / match - Detroit City FC · 1.12 goals / match - Rhode Island

Detroit City FC scoring profile: strong

Detroit City FC scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while Rhode Island keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).

Rhode Island scoring profile: strong

Rhode Island scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Detroit City FC keeps a clean sheet in 48% (13 of 27 matches).

33Goals scored (season)39
Detroit City FCRhode Island
20Goals conceded (season)29
Detroit City FCRhode Island
1.96Average goals in match2.62
Detroit City FCRhode Island
5Goals scored (last 5)8
Detroit City FCRhode Island
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
Detroit City FCRhode Island

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal77%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
30%2 goals35%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
11%3 goals27%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
4%4 goals12%
Detroit City FCRhode Island

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal73%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
22%2 goals27%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
0%3 goals8%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
0%4 goals4%
Detroit City FCRhode Island

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time19%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
4%BTTS in both halves4%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
19%Scored in both halves27%
Detroit City FCRhode Island

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
20%BTTS - last 540%
Detroit City FCRhode Island

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Detroit City FCRhode Island

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Detroit City FCRhode Island

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rhode Island is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / match - Detroit City FC · 1.35 pts / match - Rhode Island

Detroit City FC - half-time state
22% leading56% draw22% trailing
Rhode Island - half-time state
27% leading54% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per match (1st half)1.35
Detroit City FCRhode Island
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Detroit City FCRhode Island
0.37Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Detroit City FCRhode Island
0.78Average goals (1st half)0.92
Detroit City FCRhode Island
67%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
70%No goal before half-time54%
Detroit City FCRhode Island

After half-time (2nd half)

1.74Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Detroit City FCRhode Island
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
Detroit City FCRhode Island
0.37Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Detroit City FCRhode Island
1.19Average goals (2nd half)1.69
Detroit City FCRhode Island
70%Clean sheet after half-time46%
Detroit City FCRhode Island
41%No goal after half-time42%
Detroit City FCRhode Island

Detroit City FC - second-half results

41% W52% D7% L
33
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding218%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rhode Island - second-half results

35% W38% D27% L
35
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Detroit City FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Rhode Island - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Detroit City FC
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
2
2
16-30
5
3
31-45
8
2
46-60
4
4
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Rhode Island
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
10
7
16-30
3
1
31-45
6
6
46-60
10
5
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Detroit City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Rhode Island

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Detroit City FCLigaRhode Island
Average goals in match▼ 1.962.71• 2.62
Both teams scored▼ 41%54%• 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 37%50%▼ 46%
Clean sheets▲ 48%28%• 27%
Goal before half-time▼ 52%66%▼ 62%
Goal after half-time▼ 59%77%▲ 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Detroit City FCRed cardCarlos Herrera
  2. Detroit City FCSubstitutionOn: Carlos Alberto Saldaña MorenoOff: Alexander Marcus Dalou
  3. Detroit City FCSubstitutionOn: Alassane Ates DioufOff: Kiam Williams
  4. Rhode IslandYellow cardNicholas Scardina
  5. Rhode IslandYellow cardGrant Stoneman
  6. Detroit City FCGoalDarren SmithAssist: Kobe Hernandez-Foster
  7. Rhode IslandYellow cardAldair Sanchez
  8. Rhode IslandYellow cardKarifa Yao
  9. Rhode IslandYellow cardZachary Herivaux
  10. Rhode IslandSubstitutionOn: Daniel RoviraOff: Nicholas Scardina
  11. Rhode IslandSubstitutionOn: Noah FusonOff: Zachary Herivaux

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Detroit City FC 2 - 2 - 1 Rhode Island. Average goals 1.40, both teams scored in 20% matches.

Rhode Island
0 : 0
Detroit City FC
Rhode Island FC
1 : 0
Detroit City FC
Detroit City FC
2 : 0
Rhode Island FC
Detroit City FC
1 : 1
Rhode Island
Rhode Island
0 : 2
Detroit City FC

FAQ

What was the result of Detroit City FC vs Rhode Island?

The USL Championship match finished Detroit City FC 1:0 Rhode Island. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Detroit City FC and Rhode Island?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Detroit City FC won 2, Rhode Island won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Detroit City FC vs Rhode Island?

Detroit City FC score 1.22 goals per game on average and Rhode Island 1.50. The USL Championship average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Detroit City FC's matches and 54% of Rhode Island's.

What form are Detroit City FC and Rhode Island in?

Over the last 5 games Detroit City FC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Rhode Island 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Detroit City FC vs Rhode Island?

The statistical background for Detroit City FC vs Rhode Island — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.