Detroit City FC vs Tampa Bay Rowdies: match statistics
Detroit City FC vs Tampa Bay Rowdies: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Detroit City FC played Tampa Bay Rowdies in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Detroit City FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Tampa Bay Rowdies: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Detroit City FC scores 1.53 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Tampa Bay Rowdies scores 1.56 and concedes 0.81. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Detroit City FC 53%, Tampa Bay Rowdies 44%. Over 2.5: Detroit City FC 53%, Tampa Bay Rowdies 38%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Tampa Bay Rowdies has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.64. Detroit City FC: 14.1 shots per match, Tampa Bay Rowdies: 16.0.
Match halves
Detroit City FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00. Tampa Bay Rowdies: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
Detroit City FC: 76-90+ (7 goals). Tampa Bay Rowdies: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-3-0. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 80%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tampa Bay Rowdies are top of the table and have scored 13 goals in their last five matches, winning four and remaining unbeaten, while Detroit City FC have netted just 5 goals during that period. The visitors have performed exceptionally well away from home: they have won 70% of such matches, remain unbeaten, and average 1.60 goals per game. Detroit, however, have a solid home defense, conceding just 0.44 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 56% of their appearances, so the hosts may effectively limit the number of chances created by their opponents. Rowdies’ advantage is based on their superior current attacking efficiency and the fact that they have failed to score away from home on no occasion, with a 12% finishing rate compared to Detroit’s 9%. The hosts create slightly more high-quality chances at home, with an average xG of 1.73 compared to the visitors’ 1.54, but Tampa Bay’s attacking form and the leaders’ consistency point to a narrow victory for Tampa Bay.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No scenario holds a slight edge, primarily due to Tampa Bay’s very solid defense, which concedes just 0.5 goals per match on average this season and keeps a clean sheet in 60% of games. Detroit City have scored only 5 goals in their last five matches, averaging 1.0 per game, while both teams scored in just 20% of those fixtures. The hosts have recently created chances worth 1.49 xG, but Tampa Bay restricts opponents to an average of 1.19 xG, limiting Detroit’s chances of breaking through. The visitors are in significantly better offensive form, scoring 13 goals in their last five matches, so the more likely outcome appears to be one in which Tampa Bay scores but Detroit fails to respond. The seasonal BTTS figures are also below the league average of 53%, standing at 50% for Detroit and 40% for Tampa Bay.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The Over 1.5 goals line is strongly supported by the data: at least two goals were scored in 80% of Detroit’s matches and 70% of Tampa’s games. Tampa are in very good offensive form, averaging 2.6 goals scored over their last five matches, while Detroit conceded just 0.6 goals per game during that period, suggesting a tighter rather than one-sided match. The hosts create plenty of chances, averaging 18.2 shots and 6.2 shots on target, but Tampa concede only 0.5 goals per game this season and keep a clean sheet in 60% of their matches. Therefore, the 2.5-goal threshold remains finely balanced and leans slightly toward a lower-scoring outcome, but the projected 2.60 goals provide a clearer edge to Over 1.5. An additional argument is that both teams scored at least once in 90% of Detroit’s matches and in all of Tampa’s games.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Tampa Bay Rowdies have won 70% of their matches, remain unbeaten, and concede just 0.5 goals per game on average, while Detroit City FC allow opponents 1.4 goals per match. The visitors have made very solid starts to their games: they have held a lead at the break in 6 of their 10 appearances, have never gone into half-time trailing, and conceded just 0.1 goals per match in the first half. Detroit do post strong attacking home averages, namely 2.2 goals, an xG of 1.99, and 6.2 shots on target per game, but they have scored only 1.0 goal per match across their last five fixtures, and just 0.2 before half-time. Current form more clearly favours Tampa, who have averaged 2.6 goals in their last five matches, won 80% of them, and maintained their unbeaten run. The most likely scenario is therefore an HT/FT outcome of 2/2, with the visitors capitalising on their advantage before the break and holding on to their lead until full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Detroit City FC | Tampa Bay Rowdies | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Detroit City FC is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Detroit City FC · 1 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tampa Bay Rowdies is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Detroit City FC · 0.81 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies
Detroit City FC scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Tampa Bay Rowdies keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 matches).
Tampa Bay Rowdies scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while Detroit City FC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Detroit City FC
Over / Under - Tampa Bay Rowdies
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tampa Bay Rowdies is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Detroit City FC · 2 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Detroit City FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tampa Bay Rowdies - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Detroit City FC
Tampa Bay Rowdies
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Detroit City FC | Liga | Tampa Bay Rowdies | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.47 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 58% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 53% | 52% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 26% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 67% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 80% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Detroit City FC 2 - 3 - 0 Tampa Bay Rowdies. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 80% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Detroit City FC vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?
The USL Championship match finished Detroit City FC 1:0 Tampa Bay Rowdies. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Detroit City FC and Tampa Bay Rowdies?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Detroit City FC won 2, Tampa Bay Rowdies won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Detroit City FC vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?
Detroit City FC score 1.53 goals per game on average and Tampa Bay Rowdies 1.56. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Detroit City FC's matches and 44% of Tampa Bay Rowdies's.
What form are Detroit City FC and Tampa Bay Rowdies in?
Over the last 5 games Detroit City FC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tampa Bay Rowdies 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Detroit City FC vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?
The statistical background for Detroit City FC vs Tampa Bay Rowdies — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


