Saudi Arabia - First DivisionDhamak Club StadiumData current as of 21 October 2026

Dhamk vs Al Ula: match statistics

Dhamk crest
Dhamk
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Al Ula crest
Al Ula

Dhamk vs Al Ula: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dhamk played Al Ula in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 8 September 2026. Venue: Dhamak Club Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Dhamk: 0-3-0, 1.00 points/match. Al Ula: 3-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dhamk scores 0.67 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Al Ula scores 2.00 and concedes 0.33. League average: 1.93 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dhamk 33%, Al Ula 33%. Over 2.5: Dhamk 33%, Al Ula 33%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 27%.

xG, shots and style

Al Ula has higher xG: 1.83 vs 1.44. Dhamk: 13.3 shots per match, Al Ula: 16.0.

Match halves

Dhamk: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67. Al Ula: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Dhamk: 61-75 (2 goals). Al Ula: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 1.93 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 27%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Al Ula top the table and have won all 3 of their league matches so far, while Dhamk have recorded three draws and no wins after 3 games. The visitors have been significantly more clinical in their last five appearances, scoring 10 goals compared with Dhamk’s 3, while the hosts have conceded as many as 9 goals during this period. Al Ula’s superiority is also evident in chance creation away from home, averaging 17 shots and 7 on target per match, compared with Dhamk’s 11 shots and 3 on target. The visitors’ xG stands at 2.05 away from home, compared with Dhamk’s 1.28 at home, while the hosts have failed to score in 100% of their home matches. Dhamk did keep a clean sheet in their only home game, but Al Ula’s run of 4 wins in their last 5 matches points towards a victory for the league leaders.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No pick is primarily supported by Al Ula’s extremely solid defence, which has not conceded a goal in the season data and has kept a clean sheet in 100% of matches. Dhamk have recently struggled significantly in front of goal, scoring just 3 goals in their last five matches—an average of 0.6 per game—with an xG of 1.13. Al Ula are in considerably better attacking form, scoring 10 goals in their last five outings, but their season matches have recorded BTTS in 0% of cases, compared with 50% for Dhamk. Both teams have also recorded BTTS in only 40% of their last five matches, while the league average stands at 44%, further weakening the scenario of both sides scoring. The most likely outcome is therefore that Al Ula score at least once, while Dhamk fail to break through their defence.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest form clearly favors Al Ula: in their last five matches, the team averaged 2.0 goals scored, while Dhamk conceded 1.8 goals per game. Over the same period, the hosts scored just 0.6 goals, while Al Ula allowed opponents only 0.8, which limits the projected goal output for the home side. Chance-quality metrics also point toward a more moderate scoreline: Al Ula’s average xG over their last five matches stands at 1.37, while Dhamk allows 1.55 xG. Both teams had at least three goals in 60% of their last five matches, yet the league has seen only 26% of games go Over 2.5 goals, with an average of 1.93 goals per match. The strongest selection is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the visitors’ advantage should give them control of the result, but the data does not point strongly enough toward four or more goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Al Ula leading at the break and securing the win after the final whistle: the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Dhamk have failed to win any and averaged just 0.6 goals scored. Al Ula led at half-time in 60% of their recent matches and averaged 1.4 goals before the break, whereas Dhamk failed to score a single goal during that period and were trailing after 45 minutes in 60% of their appearances. The visitors’ advantage is further supported by an average xG of 2.05 compared with 1.73 for the hosts, as well as 7 shots on target per match versus 6. Dhamk do have very strong figures from their two home matches, averaging 2.5 goals scored and 0.5 conceded, but the team’s current form is clearly weaker, with an average of 1.8 goals conceded across their last five matches. Al Ula conceded just 0.8 goals per match over the same period, which is why I rate the 2/2 scenario as the most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

32Possession (%)68
DhamkAl Ula
6Shots17
DhamkAl Ula
2Shots on target5
DhamkAl Ula
0.74xG1.96
DhamkAl Ula
3Corners12
DhamkAl Ula
29Dangerous attacks75
DhamkAl Ula
12Fouls10
DhamkAl Ula
1Cards2
DhamkAl Ula

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.67Goals scored / match2
DhamkAl Ula
0.67Goals conceded / match0.33
DhamkAl Ula
46%Average possession58%
DhamkAl Ula
3Shots on target / match6.33
DhamkAl Ula

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.33Shots per match16
DhamkAl Ula
3Shots on target6.33
DhamkAl Ula
5%Shot conversion12.5%
DhamkAl Ula
46%Possession58%
DhamkAl Ula
1.44xG for1.83
DhamkAl Ula
1.2xG against1
DhamkAl Ula

Shooting quality

Dhamk: BalancedAl Ula: Dominant
DhamkAl Ula
Accuracy (shots on target)23%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Ula is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Dhamk · 3 pts / match - Al Ula

Dhamk
DDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-0
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%
Al Ula
WWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Ula is 199% better for: goals scored per match.

0.67 goals / match - Dhamk · 2 goals / match - Al Ula

Al Ula is 103% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Dhamk · 0.33 goals / match - Al Ula

Dhamk scoring profile: more difficult

Dhamk scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Al Ula keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

Al Ula scoring profile: strong

Al Ula scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Dhamk keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

2Goals scored (season)6
DhamkAl Ula
2Goals conceded (season)1
DhamkAl Ula
1.33Average goals in match2.33
DhamkAl Ula
2Goals scored (last 5)6
DhamkAl Ula
2Goals conceded (last 5)1
DhamkAl Ula

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal100%
DhamkAl Ula
33%2 goals67%
DhamkAl Ula
0%3 goals33%
DhamkAl Ula
0%4 goals0%
DhamkAl Ula

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal33%
DhamkAl Ula
33%2 goals0%
DhamkAl Ula
0%3 goals0%
DhamkAl Ula
0%4 goals0%
DhamkAl Ula

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
DhamkAl Ula
0%BTTS in both halves0%
DhamkAl Ula
0%Scored in both halves33%
DhamkAl Ula

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
DhamkAl Ula
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
DhamkAl Ula
33%BTTS - last 533%
DhamkAl Ula

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
DhamkAl Ula
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
DhamkAl Ula
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
DhamkAl Ula

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
DhamkAl Ula
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
DhamkAl Ula
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
DhamkAl Ula

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Ula is 248% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / match - Dhamk · 2.33 pts / match - Al Ula

Dhamk - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing
Al Ula - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per match (1st half)2.33
DhamkAl Ula
0Goals scored (1st half)1.33
DhamkAl Ula
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0
DhamkAl Ula
0.33Average goals (1st half)1.33
DhamkAl Ula
67%Clean sheet before half-time100%
DhamkAl Ula
100%No goal before half-time33%
DhamkAl Ula

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1.67
DhamkAl Ula
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
DhamkAl Ula
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
DhamkAl Ula
1Average goals (2nd half)1
DhamkAl Ula
67%Clean sheet after half-time67%
DhamkAl Ula
67%No goal after half-time33%
DhamkAl Ula

Dhamk - second-half results

33% W67% D0% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Ula - second-half results

33% W67% D0% L
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dhamk - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.671.67
Goals scored / match0.00.7
Goals conceded / match0.30.3
Average goals in match0.31.0
1 goal33%33%
2 goals0%33%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet67%67%
No goal100%67%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 67% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Al Ula - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.331.67
Goals scored / match1.30.7
Goals conceded / match0.00.3
Average goals in match1.31.0
1 goal67%67%
2 goals67%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%67%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 67% leading - 33% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 67% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dhamk
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Ula
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
3
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dhamk

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.77
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Al Ula

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.83
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.67
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
194%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
37%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

DhamkLigaAl Ula
Average goals in match▼ 1.331.93▲ 2.33
Both teams scored▼ 33%47%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 33%27%▲ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 67%38%▲ 67%
Goal before half-time▼ 33%60%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 33%63%▲ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.93
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
1.03
Away goals / match
+-13%
Home attack advantage
+-14%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DhamkYellow cardOsama Al Khalaf
  2. Al UlaYellow cardDamyan Ivanov Yordanov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Dhamk vs Al Ula?

The First Division match finished Dhamk 0:1 Al Ula. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dhamk vs Al Ula?

Dhamk score 0.67 goals per game on average and Al Ula 2.00. The First Division average is 1.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Dhamk's matches and 33% of Al Ula's.

What form are Dhamk and Al Ula in?

Over the last 5 games Dhamk have a 0-3-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Al Ula 3-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dhamk vs Al Ula?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Dhamk vs Al Ula: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.