Diamond Harbour vs Shillong Lajong: match statistics
Diamond Harbour vs Shillong Lajong: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Diamond Harbour played Shillong Lajong in I-League (India). The match was played on 23 May 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Diamond Harbour: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Shillong Lajong: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Diamond Harbour scores 2.38 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Shillong Lajong scores 1.85 and concedes 0.92. League average: 3.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Diamond Harbour 77%, Shillong Lajong 54%. Over 2.5: Diamond Harbour 62%, Shillong Lajong 46%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Diamond Harbour has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.49. Diamond Harbour: 11.5 shots per match, Shillong Lajong: 9.3.
Match halves
Diamond Harbour: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.69. Shillong Lajong: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.23.
Goals by minute
Diamond Harbour: 76-90+ (11 goals). Shillong Lajong: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
I-League: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Diamond Harbour has a clear advantage in chance creation and finishing: at home they average 14.67 shots per match, including 6.83 on target, with a conversion rate of 18%, translating to 1.93 xG and 2.67 average goals scored per match. Shillong Lajong defends solidly on the road — conceding only 0.83 goals per match on average and keeping clean sheets in 50% of away games, with an average offensive xG of 1.37 per match. In the last five fixtures both teams have been productive in attack (home side 14 goals, visitors 15), but the hosts have conceded 7 goals over that span compared to the visitors' 4, giving Lajong a slight defensive edge. Additionally, the hosts sit 1st and have 9 wins this season and a 67% home win rate, while the visitors have 6 wins and a 33% away win rate, which favors Diamond Harbour. Despite the visitors’ higher average points return over the last five matches (2.2 pts vs 2.0 pts for the hosts), the hosts’ advantage in shots, shots on target and xG leads me to back a Diamond Harbour win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes as the more likely outcome (72% vs 28%) because Diamond Harbour has a seasonal BTTS rate of 71% and BTTS occurred in 80% of their last 5 matches, while they average 2.57 goals scored at home and 1.0 conceded. Shillong Lajong posts only a 33% seasonal BTTS and maintains 50% clean sheets, which argues for No Goal, but their last 5 matches show 60% BTTS and they average 3.0 scored and 0.8 conceded recently, indicating maintained ability to score. xG analysis gives 1.59 xG for Diamond Harbour and 1.37 xG for Shillong (total 2.96), while the league average goals is 3.05, suggesting a match around 3 goals. Additionally, the hosts’ high shot conversion 29% versus the visitors’ 10% and the fact Diamond have 71% of home matches over 2.5 goals increase the likelihood that both teams will score. Consequently, the hosts’ offensive indicators and the visitors’ improved scoring form favor the 'Yes' variant (72%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and average goals I project total goals around 2.85 (expected xG: Diamond Harbour 1.52 vs Shillong Lajong 1.33). Diamond Harbour scores 2.57 goals at home on average and has xG_for 1.59 with a very high shot conversion of 29%, while Shillong Lajong records 1.00 away goals with xG_for 1.37 and a conversion of 10%. Diamond Harbour has 71% of home matches over 2.5 goals, and the league-wide over 2.5 rate is 56%; although Shillong’s season rate for over 2.5 is only 17%, in the last 5 fixtures both teams have 60% over 2.5. A combined xG of 2.85, a high share of hosts over 1.5 (86%) and strong home efficiency (29%) give a strong signal for the over, therefore I assess a 68% chance for Over 2.5 (92% for Over 1.5, 34% for Over 3.5). The best bet is Over 2.5, since the expected 2.85 goals and Diamond Harbour’s offensive edge increase the probability of at least 3 goals in the match.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Diamond Harbour has a clear seasonal edge: on average 2.57 goals scored per match versus 1.00 for Shillong Lajong and a higher win rate (57% vs 33%), which increases the hosts' chances of an overall victory. The half-time signal is even stronger — the hosts led at the break in 4 cases (57%) and average 1.00 goals by half-time versus 0.17 for the visitors, with 86% of their matches having at least one goal before the break. Despite similar xG (1.59 vs 1.37), the hosts convert chances to goals far more efficiently (shot conversion 29% vs 10% with comparable shot volumes 9.0 vs 9.67), so they have a greater ability to maintain a lead. After the break the hosts average 1.57 goals scored and 0.43 conceded, which further supports the scenario that a lead at the break will turn into a home victory, hence the HT/FT recommendation 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Diamond Harbour | Shillong Lajong | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Shillong Lajong is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Diamond Harbour · 2.2 pts / match - Shillong Lajong
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Diamond Harbour is 29% better for: goals scored per match.
2.38 goals / match - Diamond Harbour · 1.85 goals / match - Shillong Lajong
Shillong Lajong is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - Diamond Harbour · 0.92 goals / match - Shillong Lajong
Diamond Harbour scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Shillong Lajong keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
Shillong Lajong scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Diamond Harbour keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Diamond Harbour
Over / Under - Shillong Lajong
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Diamond Harbour is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.54 pts / match - Diamond Harbour · 1.46 pts / match - Shillong Lajong
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Diamond Harbour - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Shillong Lajong - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Diamond Harbour
Shillong Lajong
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).
Teams vs league
| Diamond Harbour | Liga | Shillong Lajong | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.69 | 3.03 | ▼ 2.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 77% | 65% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 55% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 20% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 72% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 89% | ▼ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Diamond Harbour 1 - 0 - 0 Shillong Lajong. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Diamond Harbour vs Shillong Lajong?
The I-League match finished Diamond Harbour 0:3 Shillong Lajong. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Diamond Harbour vs Shillong Lajong?
Diamond Harbour score 2.38 goals per game on average and Shillong Lajong 1.85. The I-League average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Diamond Harbour's matches and 54% of Shillong Lajong's.
What form are Diamond Harbour and Shillong Lajong in?
Over the last 5 games Diamond Harbour have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Shillong Lajong 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Diamond Harbour vs Shillong Lajong?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


