France - Ligue 2Stade Gaston-GérardData current as of 15 October 2026

Dijon vs Pau: match statistics

Dijon crest
Dijon
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Pau crest
Pau

Dijon vs Pau: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dijon played Pau in Ligue 2 (France). The match was played on 14 August 2026. Venue: Stade Gaston-Gérard. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Dijon: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match. Pau: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dijon scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Pau scores 0.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dijon 100%, Pau 0%. Over 2.5: Dijon 0%, Pau 0%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Pau has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.31. Dijon: 12.0 shots per match, Pau: 17.0.

Match halves

Dijon: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. Pau: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Dijon: 76-90+ (1 goals). Pau: 0-15 (0 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.22 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Dijon come into this match in significantly better form: they have won 3 of their last five games, drawn twice and remain unbeaten. The hosts have scored 12 goals during this period—2.4 per match—while conceding only 5. By contrast, Pau have scored 5 goals and allowed their opponents to find the net 13 times. Pau have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, averaging just 0.6 points per game compared with Dijon’s 2.2. In addition, Dijon opened the season with a 1:1 draw, whereas Pau began with a 0:1 defeat. The clear difference in current attacking efficiency and defensive stability strongly favors a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as both teams scored in only 40% of Pau’s last five matches, while the league average is just 44%. Dijon are in good offensive form, averaging 2.4 goals across their last five games, while Pau conceded as many as 2.6 goals, making a home goal highly likely. However, the key factor for this market is that Pau averaged only 1.0 goal, while Dijon’s defence allowed just 0.62 xG per match during this period. Dijon recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five appearances, but the visitors’ low attacking potential and the clear home advantage increase the likelihood of a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Dijon have averaged 2.4 goals scored over their last five matches, while Pau have conceded as many as 2.6 goals per game during the same period. The hosts have won three of their last five fixtures, scoring 12 goals in total, whereas Pau have lost four matches and allowed 13 opposition goals. As many as 80% of Dijon's recent matches and 60% of Pau's fixtures went over the 2.5-goal line, supporting a scenario with at least two goals. At the same time, Dijon's xG over their last five matches stands at only 0.60, so the prediction does not anticipate an exceptionally high-scoring game. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as Pau's weak defensive performance and the hosts' recently effective attack clearly increase the likelihood of at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Dijon are clearly the stronger side in the latest run of form: they average 2.4 goals per match, while Pau concede as many as 2.6, with win rates of 60% and 20%, respectively. The hosts were leading at the break in 75% of their recent matches and did not concede a single goal before half-time, whereas Pau were trailing after 45 minutes in 50% of their games and conceded an average of 1.25 goals. Dijon’s advantage should persist after the interval, as they average 1.75 goals in the second half, while Pau manage just 0.25 and lose the second half in 75% of cases. In addition, Dijon’s home xG stands at 1.84, compared with just 0.91 xG conceded to opponents, reinforcing the scenario of a home lead at half-time and a victory at full-time. Full-season data remains very limited, so the draw at half-time retains a significant probability; however, 1/1 remains the strongest HT/FT option.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
DijonPau
16Shots6
DijonPau
9Shots on target3
DijonPau
1.98xG0.76
DijonPau
6Corners2
DijonPau
44Dangerous attacks22
DijonPau
11Fouls17
DijonPau
0Cards2
DijonPau

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match0
DijonPau
1Goals conceded / match1
DijonPau
44%Average possession71%
DijonPau
4Shots on target / match2
DijonPau

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match17
DijonPau
4Shots on target2
DijonPau
8.3%Shot conversion0%
DijonPau
44%Possession71%
DijonPau
1.31xG for1.84
DijonPau
2.51xG against0.91
DijonPau

Shooting quality

Dijon: BalancedPau: Dominant
DijonPau
Accuracy (shots on target)33%12%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dijon
D
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 2.51BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 0%
Pau
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 0.91BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dijon scoring profile: very strong

Dijon scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Pau keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

Pau scoring profile: mixed

Pau scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Dijon keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

1Goals scored (season)0
DijonPau
1Goals conceded (season)1
DijonPau
2Average goals in match1
DijonPau
1Goals scored (last 5)0
DijonPau
1Goals conceded (last 5)1
DijonPau

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal0%
DijonPau
0%2 goals0%
DijonPau
0%3 goals0%
DijonPau
0%4 goals0%
DijonPau

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
DijonPau
0%2 goals0%
DijonPau
0%3 goals0%
DijonPau
0%4 goals0%
DijonPau

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
DijonPau
0%BTTS in both halves0%
DijonPau
0%Scored in both halves0%
DijonPau

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
DijonPau
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
DijonPau
100%BTTS - last 50%
DijonPau

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

0%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
DijonPau
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
DijonPau
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
DijonPau

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time0%
DijonPau
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
DijonPau
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
DijonPau

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dijon - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Pau - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0
DijonPau
0Goals scored (1st half)0
DijonPau
0Goals conceded (1st half)1
DijonPau
0Average goals (1st half)1
DijonPau
100%Clean sheet before half-time0%
DijonPau
100%No goal before half-time100%
DijonPau

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1
DijonPau
1Goals scored (2nd half)0
DijonPau
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0
DijonPau
2Average goals (2nd half)0
DijonPau
0%Clean sheet after half-time100%
DijonPau
0%No goal after half-time100%
DijonPau

Dijon - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pau - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dijon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.02.0
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Pau - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.00.0
1 goal100%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dijon
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Pau
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
68%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dijon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

Pau

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.93
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.93
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.84
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

DijonLigaPau
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.22▼ 1.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%44%▼ 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%44%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▼ 0%39%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 0%33%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%56%▼ 0%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.22
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.11
Home goals / match
1.11
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
33%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
22%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DijonSubstitutionOn: Tyris DongOff: Yanis Barka
  2. PauYellow cardAxel Bamba
  3. DijonSubstitutionOn: Júlio TavaresOff: Alexis N'Tamack
  4. PauSubstitutionOn: Luan GadegbekuOff: Jessy Bénet
  5. PauYellow cardLorenzo Rajot

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Dijon vs Pau?

The Ligue 2 match finished Dijon 0:1 Pau. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dijon vs Pau?

Dijon score 1.00 goals per game on average and Pau 0.00. The Ligue 2 average is 2.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Dijon's matches and 0% of Pau's.

What form are Dijon and Pau in?

Over the last 5 games Dijon have a 0-1-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Pau 0-0-1 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dijon vs Pau?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.