Georgia - Erovnuli LigaStadioni Tengiz BurjanadzeData current as of 21 October 2026

Dila vs Gagra: match statistics

Dila crest
Dila
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Gagra crest
Gagra

Dila vs Gagra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dila played Gagra in Erovnuli Liga (Georgia). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Venue: Stadioni Tengiz Burjanadze. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Dila: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Gagra: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dila scores 1.23 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Gagra scores 1.00 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dila 45%, Gagra 57%. Over 2.5: Dila 45%, Gagra 43%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Dila has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.32. Dila: 10.9 shots per match, Gagra: 10.2.

Match halves

Dila: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.64. Gagra: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.61.

Goals by minute

Dila: 76-90+ (7 goals). Gagra: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Erovnuli Liga: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 4-1-1. Average goals 2.17, BTTS 17%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Dila sit higher in the table and have scored 10 goals and collected 10 points in their last five matches, while Gagra have scored just 5 goals and picked up 6 points. The home advantage is supported by their home statistics: they average 1.42 goals with an xG of 1.43, whereas the visitors manage only 0.91 goals and 1.13 xG away from home. Dila also create more danger, averaging 11.08 shots and 4.08 shots on target per match, compared with Gagra’s 8.64 and 2.82. Gagra’s defence looks vulnerable on the road, conceding 1.45 goals per match, allowing chances worth an average of 1.66 xG, and keeping a clean sheet in just 9% of matches. Gagra frequently draw away from home, with 36% of their away matches ending level, but Dila’s superior recent scoring form and their advantage in chance quality make them the more convincing pick.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal percentage of matches in which both teams scored is 58% for Dila and 55% for Gagra, close to the league average of 56%. Dila are in a clearly stronger attacking rhythm: they have averaged 2.0 goals in their last 5 matches, with BTTS landing in 80% of them. Gagra average just 0.91 goals per season and have failed to score in 36% of their matches, which limits confidence in the pick. However, Dila concede an average of 1.17 goals, while their xG against stands at 1.57. The hosts create more chances, recording an xG of 1.49 and 4.5 shots on target per match, while Gagra allow opponents an xG of 1.66 and keep a clean sheet in only 9% of their games. The most likely scenario is therefore a Dila goal combined with at least one successful Gagra attack, although the BTTS edge is moderate.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals, as Dila’s matches have ended with at least four goals in only 8% of cases, compared with 9% for Gagra. Both teams have low season scoring averages: Dila scores 1.08 goals per match, while Gagra averages 0.91, with neither side scoring more than two goals in a single match during the analysed period. Dila should create more chances, recording 1.49 xG and 4.5 shots on target per match compared with Gagra’s 1.13 xG and 2.82 shots on target, but its projected goal tally remains close to 1.5 goals. Dila’s last five matches have been more open, averaging 2.0 goals scored and producing Over 2.5 goals in 80% of games, but the season data for both teams clearly limits the likelihood of a very high-scoring game. The estimated total of 2.50 goals supports a 1-3 goal scenario and gives the edge to the Under 3.5 goals bet.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Dila are in clearly better form: they have averaged 2.0 goals over their last five matches, won three of them, and held a lead at the break in three of those five games. Over the same period, Gagra averaged just 0.2 goals before half-time and failed to score in four of their five first halves. The hosts are creating more chances, as reflected by an xG of 1.49 compared with the visitors’ 1.13, as well as an average of 4.5 shots on target to Gagra’s 2.82. Dila also have the edge after the interval, averaging 1.2 goals in the second half across their last five appearances. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is a Dila lead at the break followed by a victory, corresponding to 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
DilaGagra
15Shots12
DilaGagra
8Shots on target3
DilaGagra
2.08xG1.48
DilaGagra
6Corners5
DilaGagra
76Dangerous attacks69
DilaGagra
8Fouls9
DilaGagra
2Cards2
DilaGagra

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.23Goals scored / match1
DilaGagra
1.09Goals conceded / match1.3
DilaGagra
48%Average possession45%
DilaGagra
3.68Shots on target / match3.74
DilaGagra

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.95Shots per match10.22
DilaGagra
3.68Shots on target3.74
DilaGagra
11.2%Shot conversion9.8%
DilaGagra
48%Possession45%
DilaGagra
1.38xG for1.32
DilaGagra
1.22xG against1.62
DilaGagra

Shooting quality

Dila: BalancedGagra: Balanced
DilaGagra
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dila is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Dila · 1.2 pts / match - Gagra

Dila
WWWDL
Season result split
41% W14% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-10
1.36 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Gagra
DDDLW
Season result split
26% W39% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-8
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dila is 23% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Dila · 1 goals / match - Gagra

Dila is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.09 goals / match - Dila · 1.3 goals / match - Gagra

Dila scoring profile: very strong

Dila scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while Gagra keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

Gagra scoring profile: strong

Gagra scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Dila keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

27Goals scored (season)23
DilaGagra
24Goals conceded (season)30
DilaGagra
2.32Average goals in match2.3
DilaGagra
12Goals scored (last 5)5
DilaGagra
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
DilaGagra

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal70%
DilaGagra
36%2 goals30%
DilaGagra
14%3 goals0%
DilaGagra
0%4 goals0%
DilaGagra

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal83%
DilaGagra
32%2 goals35%
DilaGagra
9%3 goals13%
DilaGagra
0%4 goals0%
DilaGagra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time22%
DilaGagra
5%BTTS in both halves4%
DilaGagra
23%Scored in both halves9%
DilaGagra

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
DilaGagra
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
DilaGagra
80%BTTS - last 540%
DilaGagra

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
DilaGagra
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
DilaGagra
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
DilaGagra

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
DilaGagra
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
DilaGagra
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
DilaGagra

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dila is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - Dila · 0.96 pts / match - Gagra

Dila - half-time state
27% leading55% draw18% trailing
Gagra - half-time state
13% leading57% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)0.96
DilaGagra
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.39
DilaGagra
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
DilaGagra
1.05Average goals (1st half)1.04
DilaGagra
59%Clean sheet before half-time48%
DilaGagra
55%No goal before half-time70%
DilaGagra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per match (2nd half)1.17
DilaGagra
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
DilaGagra
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
DilaGagra
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.26
DilaGagra
55%Clean sheet after half-time48%
DilaGagra
50%No goal after half-time52%
DilaGagra

Dila - second-half results

27% W41% D32% L
30
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gagra - second-half results

22% W52% D26% L
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dila - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Gagra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dila
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
5
2
16-30
4
4
31-45
2
4
46-60
5
3
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Gagra
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
2
4
16-30
4
4
31-45
5
2
46-60
2
5
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.31
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dila

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.64
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Gagra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Erovnuli Liga).

Teams vs league

DilaLigaGagra
Average goals in match▼ 2.322.63▼ 2.30
Both teams scored▼ 45%57%• 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 45%54%▼ 43%
Clean sheets▲ 32%27%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▼ 59%67%▼ 61%
Goal after half-time• 73%73%• 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GagraYellow cardLuka Gurchiani
  2. DilaSubstitutionOn: Badri GogoberishviliOff: Mohamed Kanté
  3. DilaYellow cardMaik Nelson Poeketie
  4. DilaSubstitutionOn: Giorgi JalaghoniaOff: Shota Shekiladze
  5. GagraYellow cardRichmond Adeyeye
  6. DilaYellow cardBlankson Anoff

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Dila 4 - 1 - 1 Gagra. Average goals 2.17, both teams scored in 17% matches.

Gagra
2 : 0
Dila
Dila
1 : 1
Gagra
FC Dila Gori
5 : 0
FC Gagra
FC Gagra
0 : 1
FC Dila Gori
FC Dila Gori
2 : 0
FC Gagra
FC Gagra
0 : 1
FC Dila Gori

FAQ

What was the result of Dila vs Gagra?

The Erovnuli Liga match finished Dila 1:0 Gagra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Dila and Gagra?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Dila won 4, Gagra won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.17 goals, with both teams scoring in 17% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Dila vs Gagra?

Dila score 1.23 goals per game on average and Gagra 1.00. The Erovnuli Liga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Dila's matches and 57% of Gagra's.

What form are Dila and Gagra in?

Over the last 5 games Dila have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Gagra 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dila vs Gagra?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Dila vs Gagra: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.