Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 08 September 2026

Dire Dawa Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl: match statistics

Dire Dawa Kenema crest
Dire Dawa Kenema
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Mebrat Hayl crest
Mebrat Hayl
130%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
230%(0.00)

Statistical analysis suggests a balanced confrontation favoring a draw scenario. Dire Dawa Kenema displays poor home form with only 29% wins and a high rate of 57% of matches without scoring at home. Mebrat Hayl is characterized by a solid defense in away matches, conceding an average of only 0.67 goals per match and recording 50% clean sheets. Both teams have identical form in the last five meetings (1.2 points per match) and a similar draw record. The low shot conversion rate of both teams (11% for hosts, 5% for guests) and the high rate of visitors failing to score (67% FTS%) suggest a low-scoring game where a draw is the most likely result.

Dire Dawa Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dire Dawa Kenema played Mebrat Hayl in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 9 January 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Dire Dawa Kenema: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Mebrat Hayl: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dire Dawa Kenema scores 0.69 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. Mebrat Hayl scores 0.62 and concedes 0.38. League average: 1.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dire Dawa Kenema 38%, Mebrat Hayl 15%. Over 2.5: Dire Dawa Kenema 31%, Mebrat Hayl 8%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 27%.

xG, shots and style

Mebrat Hayl has higher xG: 1.10 vs 1.03. Dire Dawa Kenema: 6.6 shots per match, Mebrat Hayl: 7.2.

Match halves

Dire Dawa Kenema: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.46. Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.62.

Goals by minute

Dire Dawa Kenema: 76-90+ (3 goals). Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.74 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 27%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis suggests a balanced confrontation favoring a draw scenario. Dire Dawa Kenema displays poor home form with only 29% wins and a high rate of 57% of matches without scoring at home. Mebrat Hayl is characterized by a solid defense in away matches, conceding an average of only 0.67 goals per match and recording 50% clean sheets. Both teams have identical form in the last five meetings (1.2 points per match) and a similar draw record. The low shot conversion rate of both teams (11% for hosts, 5% for guests) and the high rate of visitors failing to score (67% FTS%) suggest a low-scoring game where a draw is the most likely result.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
7Shots8
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
3Shots on target3
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.86xG0.95
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
5Corners2
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
28Dangerous attacks32
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
11Fouls13
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0Cards0
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.69Goals scored / match0.62
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.08Goals conceded / match0.38
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
57%Average possession53%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
2.38Shots on target / match1.85
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.62Shots per match7.23
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
2.38Shots on target1.85
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
10.5%Shot conversion8.5%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
57%Possession53%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.03xG for1.1
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.4xG against1.04
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

Shooting quality

Dire Dawa Kenema: BalancedMebrat Hayl: Balanced
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
Accuracy (shots on target)36%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dire Dawa Kenema
DDWLD
Season result split
31% W38% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-4
1.31 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Mebrat Hayl
DDWLD
Season result split
38% W46% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-2
1.62 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dire Dawa Kenema is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

0.69 goals / match - Dire Dawa Kenema · 0.62 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Mebrat Hayl is 184% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.08 goals / match - Dire Dawa Kenema · 0.38 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Dire Dawa Kenema scoring profile: more difficult

Dire Dawa Kenema scores in 46% of matches (6 of 13 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 69% (9 of 13 matches).

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: mixed

Mebrat Hayl scores in 46% of matches (6 of 13 matches), while Dire Dawa Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

9Goals scored (season)8
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
14Goals conceded (season)5
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.77Average goals in match1
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
3Goals scored (last 5)2
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

How often they score at least...

46%1 goal46%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
23%2 goals8%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0%3 goals8%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0%4 goals0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal31%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
31%2 goals8%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
8%3 goals0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0%4 goals0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
8%Scored in both halves0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS8%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
40%BTTS - last 520%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time15%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time15%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dire Dawa Kenema - half-time state
15% leading38% draw46% trailing
Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
0% leading85% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.85Points per match (1st half)0.85
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.23Goals scored (1st half)0
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.15
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.77Average goals (1st half)0.15
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
46%Clean sheet before half-time85%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
77%No goal before half-time100%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)1.77
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.46Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.23
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
1Average goals (2nd half)0.85
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
54%Clean sheet after half-time85%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
69%No goal after half-time54%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

Dire Dawa Kenema - second-half results

23% W38% R38% P
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

46% W38% R15% P
11
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dire Dawa Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dire Dawa Kenema
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
4
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
5
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.39
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
80%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
21%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
29%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dire Dawa Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
44%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Dire Dawa KenemaLigaMebrat Hayl
Average goals in match 1.771.74 1.00
Both teams scored 38%43% 15%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%27% 8%
Clean sheets 31%38% 69%
Goal before half-time 69%59% 15%
Goal after half-time 69%57% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.74
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
0.86
Home goals / match
0.88
Away goals / match
+-2%
Home attack advantage
+-2%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Dire Dawa Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Dire Dawa Kenema 0:0 Mebrat Hayl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dire Dawa Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl?

Dire Dawa Kenema score 0.69 goals per game on average and Mebrat Hayl 0.62. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Dire Dawa Kenema's matches and 15% of Mebrat Hayl's.

What form are Dire Dawa Kenema and Mebrat Hayl in?

Over the last 5 games Dire Dawa Kenema have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Mebrat Hayl 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dire Dawa Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl?

The statistical background for Dire Dawa Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.