Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 23 July 2026

Dodoma Jiji vs Kitayosce: match statistics

Dodoma Jiji crest
Dodoma Jiji
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce
155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Dodoma Jiji presents solid home form with a 50% win rate at their own stadium and an impressive clean sheet record (50%). The hosts have recorded a streak of four victories in their last five home matches, proving their strength on home turf. Kitayosce faces serious problems in away matches—only 17% wins and as many as 50% losses, with a high FTS rate (50%), indicating frequent difficulties in scoring goals. An additional asset for the hosts is the higher average xG (1.05 vs 0.65) and better shooting accuracy, suggesting greater offensive efficiency. Considering all statistics, Dodoma Jiji holds a clear advantage, although the visitors' form in recent overall matches (2 wins out of 5) warrants caution, hence the inclusion of a potential draw.

Dodoma Jiji vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dodoma Jiji play Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 12 February 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Dodoma Jiji: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Kitayosce: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dodoma Jiji scores 0.83 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Kitayosce scores 1.10 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dodoma Jiji 33%, Kitayosce 33%. Over 2.5: Dodoma Jiji 37%, Kitayosce 40%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Kitayosce has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.09. Dodoma Jiji: 5.7 shots per match, Kitayosce: 6.2.

Match halves

Dodoma Jiji: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.40. Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Dodoma Jiji: 31-45+ (7 goals). Kitayosce: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Dodoma Jiji presents solid home form with a 50% win rate at their own stadium and an impressive clean sheet record (50%). The hosts have recorded a streak of four victories in their last five home matches, proving their strength on home turf. Kitayosce faces serious problems in away matches—only 17% wins and as many as 50% losses, with a high FTS rate (50%), indicating frequent difficulties in scoring goals. An additional asset for the hosts is the higher average xG (1.05 vs 0.65) and better shooting accuracy, suggesting greater offensive efficiency. Considering all statistics, Dodoma Jiji holds a clear advantage, although the visitors' form in recent overall matches (2 wins out of 5) warrants caution, hence the inclusion of a potential draw.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
11Shots5
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
5Shots on target2
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
1.76xG0.97
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
2Corners0
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
98Dangerous attacks68
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
-1Fouls-1
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
-1Cards-1
Dodoma JijiKitayosce

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Dodoma JijiKitayosce
0.83Goals scored / match1.1
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
1.2Goals conceded / match0.93
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
43%Average possession42%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
1.93Shots on target / match2.27
Dodoma JijiKitayosce

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.67Shots per match6.23
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
1.93Shots on target2.27
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
14.7%Shot conversion17.6%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
43%Possession42%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
1.09xG for1.25
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
1.35xG against1.3
Dodoma JijiKitayosce

Shooting quality

Dodoma Jiji: Counter-attackingKitayosce: Counter-attacking
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitayosce is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Dodoma Jiji · 1.2 pts / match - Kitayosce

Dodoma Jiji
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W37% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-11-11
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-2
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Kitayosce
WDDLD
Season result split
37% W33% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-9
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

0.83 goals / match - Dodoma Jiji · 1.1 goals / match - Kitayosce

Kitayosce is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - Dodoma Jiji · 0.93 goals / match - Kitayosce

Dodoma Jiji scoring profile: mixed

Dodoma Jiji scores in 53% of matches (16 of 30 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).

Kitayosce scoring profile: mixed

Kitayosce scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Dodoma Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

25Goals scored (season)33
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
36Goals conceded (season)28
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
2.03Average goals in match2.03
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
2Goals scored (last 5)2
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
11Goals conceded (last 5)4
Dodoma JijiKitayosce

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal57%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
20%2 goals30%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
10%3 goals17%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
0%4 goals7%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal57%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
33%2 goals27%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
20%3 goals10%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
3%4 goals0%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
17%Scored in both halves13%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
40%BTTS - last 520%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dodoma Jiji is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / match - Dodoma Jiji · 1.13 pts / match - Kitayosce

Dodoma Jiji - half-time state
23% leading60% draw17% trailing
Kitayosce - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per match (1st half)1.13
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
0.9Average goals (1st half)1
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
73%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
60%No goal before half-time67%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per match (2nd half)1.3
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
1Average goals (2nd half)0.9
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
57%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce
70%No goal after half-time67%
Dodoma JijiKitayosce

Dodoma Jiji - second-half results

17% W53% R30% P
39
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kitayosce - second-half results

27% W50% R23% P
34
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding185%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dodoma Jiji - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-4-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dodoma Jiji
ScoredConceded
3
10
0-15
3
3
16-30
7
4
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
7
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+97%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dodoma Jiji

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Dodoma JijiLigaKitayosce
Average goals in match 2.032.17 2.03
Both teams scored 33%35% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%39% 40%
Clean sheets 40%39% 43%
Goal before half-time 50%60% 57%
Goal after half-time 60%63% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Dodoma Jiji 0 - 1 - 0 Kitayosce. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Kitayosce
2 : 2
Dodoma Jiji

FAQ

What was the result of Dodoma Jiji vs Kitayosce?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Dodoma Jiji 3:0 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dodoma Jiji vs Kitayosce?

Dodoma Jiji score 0.83 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.10. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Dodoma Jiji's matches and 33% of Kitayosce's.

What form are Dodoma Jiji and Kitayosce in?

Over the last 5 games Dodoma Jiji have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Kitayosce 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dodoma Jiji vs Kitayosce?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Dodoma Jiji vs Kitayosce: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.