Doncaster Rovers vs Huddersfield Town: match statistics
Huddersfield Town occupies 6th place in the table and presents clearly better form than Doncaster Rovers (20th position). The visitors possess a better overall record (14 victories compared to 9 for the hosts) and higher scoring efficiency in away matches (12% conversion versus 10% for the hosts). Although Doncaster has a better goal difference at home (-1 compared to -6 for the visitors on the road), recent form speaks for Huddersfield (1.6 PPG versus 1.4 PPG for the hosts). Huddersfield also demonstrates better offensive regularity, failing to score in only 19% of away matches, while the hosts have a better result only in this aspect (7% FTS%). Taking into account the higher table position, better overall form, and greater experience in accumulating points, Huddersfield Town holds the advantage in this clash.
Doncaster Rovers vs Huddersfield Town: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Doncaster Rovers played Huddersfield Town in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 17 February 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Doncaster Rovers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Huddersfield Town: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Doncaster Rovers scores 1.10 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Huddersfield Town scores 1.66 and concedes 1.34. League average: 2.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Doncaster Rovers 53%, Huddersfield Town 59%. Over 2.5: Doncaster Rovers 53%, Huddersfield Town 59%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Huddersfield Town has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.37. Doncaster Rovers: 12.5 shots per match, Huddersfield Town: 12.6.
Match halves
Doncaster Rovers: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.47. Huddersfield Town: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.94.
Goals by minute
Doncaster Rovers: 0-15 (7 goals). Huddersfield Town: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Huddersfield Town occupies 6th place in the table and presents clearly better form than Doncaster Rovers (20th position). The visitors possess a better overall record (14 victories compared to 9 for the hosts) and higher scoring efficiency in away matches (12% conversion versus 10% for the hosts). Although Doncaster has a better goal difference at home (-1 compared to -6 for the visitors on the road), recent form speaks for Huddersfield (1.6 PPG versus 1.4 PPG for the hosts). Huddersfield also demonstrates better offensive regularity, failing to score in only 19% of away matches, while the hosts have a better result only in this aspect (7% FTS%). Taking into account the higher table position, better overall form, and greater experience in accumulating points, Huddersfield Town holds the advantage in this clash.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Doncaster Rovers | Huddersfield Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Huddersfield Town is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Doncaster Rovers · 2 pts / match - Huddersfield Town
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Huddersfield Town is 51% better for: goals scored per match.
1.1 goals / match - Doncaster Rovers · 1.66 goals / match - Huddersfield Town
Huddersfield Town is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Doncaster Rovers · 1.34 goals / match - Huddersfield Town
Doncaster Rovers scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Huddersfield Town keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).
Huddersfield Town scores in 88% of matches (28 of 32 matches), while Doncaster Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Doncaster Rovers
Over / Under - Huddersfield Town
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Huddersfield Town is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.3 pts / match - Doncaster Rovers · 1.47 pts / match - Huddersfield Town
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Doncaster Rovers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Huddersfield Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Doncaster Rovers
Huddersfield Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Doncaster Rovers | Liga | Huddersfield Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.77 | 2.59 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 51% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 50% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 27% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 68% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 81% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Doncaster Rovers 0 - 0 - 1 Huddersfield Town. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Doncaster Rovers vs Huddersfield Town?
The EFL League One match finished Doncaster Rovers 1:0 Huddersfield Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Doncaster Rovers vs Huddersfield Town?
Doncaster Rovers score 1.10 goals per game on average and Huddersfield Town 1.66. The EFL League One average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Doncaster Rovers's matches and 59% of Huddersfield Town's.
What form are Doncaster Rovers and Huddersfield Town in?
Over the last 5 games Doncaster Rovers have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Huddersfield Town 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Doncaster Rovers vs Huddersfield Town?
The statistical background for Doncaster Rovers vs Huddersfield Town — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.