Doncaster Rovers vs Mansfield Town: match statistics
Doncaster Rovers vs Mansfield Town: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Doncaster Rovers played Mansfield Town in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 3 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Doncaster Rovers: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Mansfield Town: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Doncaster Rovers scores 1.08 and concedes 1.51 goals per match. Mansfield Town scores 1.27 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.60 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Doncaster Rovers 51%, Mansfield Town 57%. Over 2.5: Doncaster Rovers 51%, Mansfield Town 46%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Doncaster Rovers has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.28. Doncaster Rovers: 12.4 shots per match, Mansfield Town: 11.5.
Match halves
Doncaster Rovers: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.49. Mansfield Town: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.78.
Goals by minute
Doncaster Rovers: 16-30 (8 goals). Mansfield Town: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Doncaster holds a clear advantage in the quality and quantity of offensive opportunities: at home they average 13.74 shots and 3.79 on target per match, while Mansfield away records 9.12 shots and 2.35 on target. This translates into higher expected goals (xG) — 1.49 for the hosts versus 1.00 for the visitors — and a higher goals scored average 1.32 for Doncaster compared to 0.94 for Mansfield. Doncaster rarely fail to score (FTS 11% vs 29% for Mansfield) and have accumulated 2.2 points per match in the last five fixtures (form: dwdww), whereas Mansfield have 1.6 points with a record lwddw, giving the hosts a form edge. On the other hand Mansfield are slightly more compact away in terms of goals conceded (1.18 vs 1.42 for Doncaster) and draw frequently (41% draws away), so the game can be tight; however, Doncaster’s dominance in the number and quality of chances and better short-term form argue in favor of their victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS rates of 55% (Doncaster) and 59% (Mansfield), above the league average of 52%, providing an initial signal in favor of BTTS - Yes. Over the season Doncaster averages 1.55 goals scored and concedes 1.05 per match, while Mansfield scores 0.94 and concedes 1.18, giving a combined goals average of 2.49, close to the league 2.61. In the last 5 matches Doncaster has only 40% BTTS and concedes on average 0.4 goals (2 conceded) while scoring 1.0, whereas Mansfield in the last 5 has 80% BTTS, scores 1.8 and concedes 1.2 (9 scored, 6 conceded), which strongly favors the Goal/Goal scenario. Additionally xG shows Doncaster generates 1.53 xG vs 1.26 xG against, while Mansfield posts 1.00 xG vs 1.49 xG against; Doncaster also attempts more shots (13.55 with 4.4 on target on average vs Mansfield’s 9.12 and 2.35 on target), so the home side should create chances. Considering the season BTTS 55%/59%, Mansfield’s high recent 5-match rate (80%) and the combined goals average of 2.49, I back BTTS - Yes with a probability of 62% vs 38% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A model combining xG and seasonal averages yields an expected 1.51 goals for Doncaster and 1.13 for Mansfield, totaling 2.64 goals (calculated as home xG 1.53 and xG conceded by away 1.49, and away xG 1.00 and xG conceded by home 1.26). Seasonal stats confirm a propensity for goals: Doncaster has 80% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Mansfield 76%; over 0.5 occurs in 90% and 88% of games; and both teams scored in 55% and 59% of cases. Offensively the hosts average 13.55 shots and 4.4 on target per match versus 9.12 and 2.35 for the visitors, with conversion rates of 11% vs 10%, which increases the chance of converting chances. Based on these data I assess Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (≈85% probability), Over 2.5 as moderate (≈52%), and Over 3.5 as unlikely (≈18%) — consistent with seasonal figures of 55%/35% for Over 2.5 and 25%/6% for Over 3.5. Therefore I recommend betting the Over 1.5 as the best line to play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Doncaster holds a clear offensive edge: they average 1.55 goals per match versus Mansfield’s 0.94 and have an xG of 1.53 compared to the visitors’ 1.00, while their average shots on target are 4.4 versus 2.35. At Half-Time the hosts are level in 45% of matches and lead in only 30%, so a draw at the break is the most common HT scenario. After the break Doncaster scores an average of 1.05 goals and wins 50% of Second-Half periods, whereas Mansfield score 0.47 post-break and win only 18% of those periods. For these reasons I assess the most likely outcome as a draw at Half-Time with a home win Full-Time (X/1) — 27%; alternatively 1/1 is 21%, and a draw at both Half-Time and Full-Time (X/X) is 14%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Doncaster Rovers | Mansfield Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Doncaster Rovers is 22% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Doncaster Rovers · 1.8 pts / match - Mansfield Town
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mansfield Town is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.08 goals / match - Doncaster Rovers · 1.27 goals / match - Mansfield Town
Mansfield Town is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.51 goals / match - Doncaster Rovers · 1.11 goals / match - Mansfield Town
Doncaster Rovers scores in 72% of matches (28 of 39 matches), while Mansfield Town keeps a clean sheet in 30% (11 of 37 matches).
Mansfield Town scores in 76% of matches (28 of 37 matches), while Doncaster Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 39 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Doncaster Rovers
Over / Under - Mansfield Town
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Doncaster Rovers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Mansfield Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Doncaster Rovers
Mansfield Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Doncaster Rovers | Liga | Mansfield Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.59 | 2.60 | ▼ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | • 51% | 52% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 51% | 51% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | • 26% | 27% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 71% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 80% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Doncaster Rovers 1 - 0 - 0 Mansfield Town. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Doncaster Rovers vs Mansfield Town?
The EFL League One match finished Doncaster Rovers 0:2 Mansfield Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Doncaster Rovers vs Mansfield Town?
Doncaster Rovers score 1.08 goals per game on average and Mansfield Town 1.27. The EFL League One average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Doncaster Rovers's matches and 57% of Mansfield Town's.
What form are Doncaster Rovers and Mansfield Town in?
Over the last 5 games Doncaster Rovers have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Mansfield Town 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Doncaster Rovers vs Mansfield Town?
The statistical background for Doncaster Rovers vs Mansfield Town — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


