Doncaster Rovers vs Plymouth Argyle: match statistics
Doncaster Rovers vs Plymouth Argyle: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Doncaster Rovers played Plymouth Argyle in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Venue: The Keepmoat Stadium. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Doncaster Rovers: 0-3-1, 0.75 points/match. Plymouth Argyle: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Doncaster Rovers scores 1.00 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Plymouth Argyle scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.08 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Doncaster Rovers 75%, Plymouth Argyle 50%. Over 2.5: Doncaster Rovers 50%, Plymouth Argyle 25%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Plymouth Argyle has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.25. Doncaster Rovers: 12.0 shots per match, Plymouth Argyle: 13.0.
Match halves
Doncaster Rovers: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75. Plymouth Argyle: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Doncaster Rovers: 31-45+ (1 goals). Plymouth Argyle: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 3.08 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Plymouth Argyle sit 11th, while Doncaster Rovers are down in 20th, with the visitors earning 7 points from their last 5 matches compared with the hosts’ 3. Doncaster have failed to win any of their last five fixtures, recording 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 defeats, while conceding 8 goals during that period. Plymouth, meanwhile, have won 2 of their last 5 matches and scored 8 goals, which is 3 more than the hosts. Both teams have drawn one away match so far, but Argyle average 1 goal with an xG of 1.23, whereas Doncaster have yet to score at home and have failed to convert the 13 shots they average. The visitors’ advantage is not substantial, as they allow opponents an away xG of 1.66, while Doncaster’s home xG stands at 1.33. However, the hosts’ poor finishing and the more favorable form trend point towards Plymouth.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for BTTS - Yes is clear, as Plymouth have recorded goals from both teams in 100% of their matches so far, while Doncaster have done so in 50%. Current form also points towards goals at both ends: BTTS occurred in 80% of Doncaster’s and 60% of Plymouth’s last five matches, with both teams conceding an average of 1.6 goals per game. Plymouth are yet to keep a clean sheet, and their opponents have created an average of 1.66 xG, while Doncaster generate 1.39 xG at home. The visitors have recently posted 1.46 xG in attack and score an average of 1.6 goals, so they should take advantage of Doncaster allowing opponents 1.80 xG. Although the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches this season, the league’s high BTTS rate of 69%, combined with the current profiles of both teams, points more towards a Goal/Goal outcome than BTTS - No. BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically mean a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The 2.55-goal projection is based on the favorable matchup between Doncaster’s attack, averaging 1.39 xG, and a Plymouth defense allowing an average of 1.66 xG. Plymouth creates an average of 1.23 xG, while Doncaster has allowed opponents as much as 1.80 xG in their last five matches, meaning the visitors should also create genuine scoring chances. In their last five fixtures, both teams conceded 1.6 goals per match, while Doncaster’s games finished Over 2.5 goals in 60% of cases. At the same time, both sides have surpassed the 1.5-goal mark in their matches so far this season, providing a stronger basis than the riskier Over 2.5. Over 1.5 is therefore the best option, as even with moderate finishing efficiency, the model projects at least two goals with a clear probability of 74%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw followed by a Plymouth win is the most likely outcome, as Doncaster have failed to score before the break in each of their last five matches and were level at half-time in 60% of those games. Plymouth led at the break in 40% of their last five outings, while the home side have also kept a clean sheet before half-time in 60% of matches, limiting the visitors’ chances of taking an early lead. After the interval, the form advantage shifts towards Plymouth: the visitors average 1.0 goals in the second half, while Doncaster concede as many as 1.2 goals per match during this period. Across their last five matches, Plymouth averaged 1.6 goals and 1.4 points per game, compared with Doncaster’s respective figures of 1.0 goals and 0.6 points. Additionally, the home side’s xG stands at 1.39, compared with Plymouth conceding an average xG of 1.66. However, Doncaster’s current finishing efficiency is poor, making a second-half turnaround in favour of the visitors more plausible.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Doncaster Rovers | Plymouth Argyle | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 25% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Plymouth Argyle is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.75 pts / match - Doncaster Rovers · 1 pts / match - Plymouth Argyle
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Doncaster Rovers is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - Doncaster Rovers · 1.5 goals / match - Plymouth Argyle
Doncaster Rovers scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Plymouth Argyle keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
Plymouth Argyle scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Doncaster Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Doncaster Rovers
Over / Under - Plymouth Argyle
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Plymouth Argyle is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / match - Doncaster Rovers · 1.5 pts / match - Plymouth Argyle
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Doncaster Rovers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Plymouth Argyle - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.25 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.5 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 25% |
| No goal | 75% | 50% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.50 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Doncaster Rovers
Plymouth Argyle
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Doncaster Rovers | Liga | Plymouth Argyle | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.25 | 3.08 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 65% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 61% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 21% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 61% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 86% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Doncaster Rovers 0 - 0 - 2 Plymouth Argyle. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Doncaster Rovers vs Plymouth Argyle?
The EFL League One match finished Doncaster Rovers 2:3 Plymouth Argyle. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Doncaster Rovers and Plymouth Argyle?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Doncaster Rovers won 0, Plymouth Argyle won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Doncaster Rovers vs Plymouth Argyle?
Doncaster Rovers score 1.00 goals per game on average and Plymouth Argyle 1.00. The EFL League One average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Doncaster Rovers's matches and 50% of Plymouth Argyle's.
What form are Doncaster Rovers and Plymouth Argyle in?
Over the last 5 games Doncaster Rovers have a 0-3-1 record (0.75 points per game) and Plymouth Argyle 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Doncaster Rovers vs Plymouth Argyle?
The statistical background for Doncaster Rovers vs Plymouth Argyle — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


