Doxa vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics
Doxa occupies a higher position in the table (4th place) and displays more stable form than MEAP Nisou (7th place). The visitors are on a disastrous run – five consecutive defeats without earning a single point, conceding as many as 15 goals in the process. Doxa has a home record of 3 wins, 3 draws, and 4 losses, which translates to a 30% win rate, but the hosts have an advantage in possession (56%) and a better goal difference in home matches (-2 compared to the visitors' -4 away). Although MEAP Nisou has an identical away win percentage (33%), their dreadful current form and a high average of goals conceded (1.56 per away match) significantly diminish their chances. Considering all statistics, Doxa should capitalize on their home advantage and the opponent's poor form, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the hosts' moderate effectiveness.
Doxa vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Doxa played MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 14 February 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Doxa: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. MEAP Nisou: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Doxa scores 1.26 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. MEAP Nisou scores 1.05 and concedes 1.84. League average: 2.66 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Doxa 42%, MEAP Nisou 53%. Over 2.5: Doxa 32%, MEAP Nisou 53%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
MEAP Nisou has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.44. Doxa: 5.7 shots per match, MEAP Nisou: 8.7.
Match halves
Doxa: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.74. MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.42.
Goals by minute
Doxa: 76-90+ (9 goals). MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Doxa occupies a higher position in the table (4th place) and displays more stable form than MEAP Nisou (7th place). The visitors are on a disastrous run – five consecutive defeats without earning a single point, conceding as many as 15 goals in the process. Doxa has a home record of 3 wins, 3 draws, and 4 losses, which translates to a 30% win rate, but the hosts have an advantage in possession (56%) and a better goal difference in home matches (-2 compared to the visitors' -4 away). Although MEAP Nisou has an identical away win percentage (33%), their dreadful current form and a high average of goals conceded (1.56 per away match) significantly diminish their chances. Considering all statistics, Doxa should capitalize on their home advantage and the opponent's poor form, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the hosts' moderate effectiveness.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Doxa | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.25 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.65 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Doxa is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
1.26 goals / match - Doxa · 1.05 goals / match - MEAP Nisou
Doxa is 94% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.95 goals / match - Doxa · 1.84 goals / match - MEAP Nisou
Doxa scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).
MEAP Nisou scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while Doxa keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Doxa
Over / Under - MEAP Nisou
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Doxa is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / match - Doxa · 1.05 pts / match - MEAP Nisou
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Doxa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Doxa
MEAP Nisou
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Doxa | Liga | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.21 | 2.66 | ▲ 2.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 47% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 29% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 73% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 78% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- MEAP NisouGoalEric Appiah Ansu
- MEAP NisouGoalEric Appiah Ansu
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Doxa 0 - 0 - 1 MEAP Nisou. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Doxa vs MEAP Nisou?
The Second Division match finished Doxa 0:2 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Doxa vs MEAP Nisou?
Doxa score 1.26 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.05. The Second Division average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Doxa's matches and 53% of MEAP Nisou's.
What form are Doxa and MEAP Nisou in?
Over the last 5 games Doxa have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Doxa vs MEAP Nisou?
The statistical background for Doxa vs MEAP Nisou — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.