Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 06 September 2026

Doxa vs Nea Salamis: match statistics

Doxa crest
Doxa
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Nea Salamis crest
Nea Salamis
120%(3.75)
X25%(3.05)
255%(1.92)

Nea Salamis is displaying exceptional form as the league leader with a record of 15 wins, 2 draws, and 0 losses this season. The visiting team boasts an impressive 100% win rate in away matches, scoring an average of 2.13 goals per match while conceding just 0.38. Nea Salamis' form in their last five away games consists of eight consecutive victories, confirming their dominance. Doxa, as the host, has mixed results with 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% losses at home, averaging only 0.78 goals per match. The difference in quality between the two teams is significant, as seen in the xG statistics, where the visitors hold an advantage of 1.95 to 1.41. Considering all data, Nea Salamis is the decided favorite for this encounter.

Doxa vs Nea Salamis: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Doxa played Nea Salamis in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 30 January 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Doxa: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Nea Salamis: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Doxa scores 1.29 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Nea Salamis scores 1.88 and concedes 0.35. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Doxa 41%, Nea Salamis 29%. Over 2.5: Doxa 29%, Nea Salamis 35%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Nea Salamis has higher xG: 2.05 vs 1.48. Doxa: 6.1 shots per match, Nea Salamis: 13.9.

Match halves

Doxa: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.76. Nea Salamis: half-time lead 59%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

Doxa: 76-90+ (8 goals). Nea Salamis: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nea Salamis is displaying exceptional form as the league leader with a record of 15 wins, 2 draws, and 0 losses this season. The visiting team boasts an impressive 100% win rate in away matches, scoring an average of 2.13 goals per match while conceding just 0.38. Nea Salamis' form in their last five away games consists of eight consecutive victories, confirming their dominance. Doxa, as the host, has mixed results with 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% losses at home, averaging only 0.78 goals per match. The difference in quality between the two teams is significant, as seen in the xG statistics, where the visitors hold an advantage of 1.95 to 1.41. Considering all data, Nea Salamis is the decided favorite for this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
DoxaNea Salamis
6Shots10
DoxaNea Salamis
3Shots on target5
DoxaNea Salamis
0.97xG1.41
DoxaNea Salamis
2Corners6
DoxaNea Salamis
51Dangerous attacks58
DoxaNea Salamis
-1Fouls-1
DoxaNea Salamis
-1Cards-1
DoxaNea Salamis

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.29Goals scored / match1.88
DoxaNea Salamis
0.88Goals conceded / match0.35
DoxaNea Salamis
32%Average possession48%
DoxaNea Salamis
2.06Shots on target / match5.47
DoxaNea Salamis

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.12Shots per match13.94
DoxaNea Salamis
2.06Shots on target5.47
DoxaNea Salamis
21.2%Shot conversion13.5%
DoxaNea Salamis
32%Possession48%
DoxaNea Salamis
1.48xG for2.05
DoxaNea Salamis
1.4xG against0.93
DoxaNea Salamis

Shooting quality

Doxa: Counter-attackingNea Salamis: Efficient finishing
DoxaNea Salamis
Accuracy (shots on target)34%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.240.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.630.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nea Salamis is 114% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Doxa · 3 pts / match - Nea Salamis

Doxa
WLWDL
Season result split
47% W24% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-5
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Nea Salamis
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
88% W12% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-2-0
2.76 pts / match · goal difference +26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-0-0
Last 5 away
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 2.16Opponent xG: 0.80BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nea Salamis is 46% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - Doxa · 1.88 goals / match - Nea Salamis

Nea Salamis is 151% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.88 goals / match - Doxa · 0.35 goals / match - Nea Salamis

Doxa scoring profile: mixed

Doxa scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 71% (12 of 17 matches).

Nea Salamis scoring profile: very strong

Nea Salamis scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Doxa keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 matches).

22Goals scored (season)32
DoxaNea Salamis
15Goals conceded (season)6
DoxaNea Salamis
2.18Average goals in match2.24
DoxaNea Salamis
7Goals scored (last 5)11
DoxaNea Salamis
4Goals conceded (last 5)1
DoxaNea Salamis

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal88%
DoxaNea Salamis
47%2 goals65%
DoxaNea Salamis
6%3 goals24%
DoxaNea Salamis
6%4 goals12%
DoxaNea Salamis

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal29%
DoxaNea Salamis
18%2 goals6%
DoxaNea Salamis
6%3 goals0%
DoxaNea Salamis
0%4 goals0%
DoxaNea Salamis

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time24%
DoxaNea Salamis
0%BTTS in both halves6%
DoxaNea Salamis
12%Scored in both halves47%
DoxaNea Salamis

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
DoxaNea Salamis
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
DoxaNea Salamis
20%BTTS - last 520%
DoxaNea Salamis

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
DoxaNea Salamis
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
DoxaNea Salamis
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
DoxaNea Salamis

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
DoxaNea Salamis
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
DoxaNea Salamis
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
DoxaNea Salamis

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nea Salamis is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.35 pts / match - Doxa · 2.18 pts / match - Nea Salamis

Doxa - half-time state
29% leading47% draw24% trailing
Nea Salamis - half-time state
59% leading41% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.35Points per match (1st half)2.18
DoxaNea Salamis
0.53Goals scored (1st half)1.06
DoxaNea Salamis
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.24
DoxaNea Salamis
1Average goals (1st half)1.29
DoxaNea Salamis
65%Clean sheet before half-time76%
DoxaNea Salamis
59%No goal before half-time29%
DoxaNea Salamis

After half-time (2nd half)

1.53Points per match (2nd half)2.18
DoxaNea Salamis
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
DoxaNea Salamis
0.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.12
DoxaNea Salamis
1.18Average goals (2nd half)0.94
DoxaNea Salamis
59%Clean sheet after half-time88%
DoxaNea Salamis
59%No goal after half-time35%
DoxaNea Salamis

Doxa - second-half results

41% W29% R29% P
23
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nea Salamis - second-half results

59% W41% R0% P
37
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at half-time in 59% of matches and wins 88%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Doxa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Nea Salamis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.80
Goals scored / match1.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match2.00.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+8+2
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 9

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Doxa
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
5
4
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Nea Salamis
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
8
2
16-30
6
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
2
61-75
9
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-55%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Doxa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Nea Salamis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
144%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
28%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

DoxaLigaNea Salamis
Average goals in match 2.182.59 2.24
Both teams scored 41%48% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%44% 35%
Clean sheets 35%30% 71%
Goal before half-time 65%71% 71%
Goal after half-time 71%76% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+-3%
Home attack advantage
+-3%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Aldair Adulai Djaló Baldé⚽ 1
Panagiotis Louka⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nea SalamisGoalPanagiotis Louka
  2. Nea SalamisGoalAldair Adulai Djaló Baldé

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Doxa 0 - 0 - 1 Nea Salamis. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Doxa
0 : 1
Nea Salamis

FAQ

What was the result of Doxa vs Nea Salamis?

The Second Division match finished Doxa 0:2 Nea Salamis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Doxa vs Nea Salamis?

Doxa score 1.29 goals per game on average and Nea Salamis 1.88. The Second Division average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Doxa's matches and 29% of Nea Salamis's.

What form are Doxa and Nea Salamis in?

Over the last 5 games Doxa have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Nea Salamis 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Doxa vs Nea Salamis?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.