Slovenia - 2. SNLŠtadion DobravaData current as of 03 November 2026

Dravinja vs Dekani: match statistics

Dravinja crest
Dravinja
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Dekani crest
Dekani

Dravinja vs Dekani: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dravinja played Dekani in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Venue: Štadion Dobrava. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Dravinja: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Dekani: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dravinja scores 1.50 and concedes 2.17 goals per match. Dekani scores 0.58 and concedes 0.58. League average: 2.93 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dravinja 75%, Dekani 8%. Over 2.5: Dravinja 67%, Dekani 17%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Dravinja has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.53. Dravinja: 11.8 shots per match, Dekani: 11.8.

Match halves

Dravinja: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.92. Dekani: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.17.

Goals by minute

Dravinja: 61-75 (6 goals). Dekani: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Dravinja sit 14th and Dekani 10th, but home advantage favors the hosts: they average 1.6 goals per match at home, while the visitors score just 0.4 away. Dravinja have won 2 of their last 5 matches, compared with Dekani’s 3, but Dekani have lost 3 of their 5 away games and failed to score in 80% of them. The hosts create slightly better chances at home, posting an xG of 1.71 compared with Dekani’s away xG of 1.63, and average 5.2 shots on target to their opponents’ 3.8. Dravinja’s defensive record is a concern, however: they concede an average of 2.6 goals at home, while Dekani concede 1.0 away. Still, the visitors’ low scoring output—just 0.4 goals per away match on average—gives the hosts a slight edge in this prediction.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to at least one team failing to score: Dekani have failed to find the net in 80% of their away matches, while Dravinja have kept a clean sheet in 83% of their home games. The visitors average just 0.4 goals per away match, with a shot conversion rate of 3%, weakening their chances of breaking down the hosts’ defence. Both teams scored in 0% of Dravinja’s home matches and 20% of Dekani’s away games. Dravinja’s recent form offers some counterweight: both sides scored in each of their last five matches, and the team conceded an average of 2 goals. However, as that run also includes away fixtures, the clear data for the current home–away matchup make BTTS - No the more likely pick. This means at least one team is expected not to score; it does not necessarily mean a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Dravinja’s home matches average 1.16 goals, while Dekani’s away matches average 1.40; neither group has seen more than 3 goals. The hosts concede just 0.33 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 83% of those games, while the visitors score an average of 0.40 goals away from home. However, caution is warranted: Dravinja’s last 5 matches have averaged 3.6 goals, with Over 2.5 goals landing in 80% of them. Despite this recent increase in goal output, the Under 3.5 goals line has the strongest backing in the respective home and away match data; the total-goals forecast is 2.20.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal for the 1/1 scenario comes from Dravinja’s home results: they led at the break in 3 of 6 matches and won 50% of their games, while Dekani have not led at half-time in any away match and have lost 60% of them. The hosts concede an average of 0.33 goals at home, while the visitors score just 0.40 away and failed to score in 80% of those matches, which favors them holding on to any lead. Before half-time, Dravinja score an average of 0.67 goals at home, compared with the 0.60 goals Dekani concede away, making an opening-half lead a realistic possibility. However, the risk of a draw is significant: the visitors were level at the break in 60% of their away matches, and Dravinja have not led at half-time in any of their last 5 matches overall. Therefore, 1/1 remains the most likely single outcome, although X/X and X/1 are also clearly supported by the data.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
DravinjaDekani
12Shots17
DravinjaDekani
6Shots on target4
DravinjaDekani
1.71xG2.1
DravinjaDekani
4Corners6
DravinjaDekani
72Dangerous attacks103
DravinjaDekani
12Fouls12
DravinjaDekani
0Cards0
DravinjaDekani

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match0.58
DravinjaDekani
2.17Goals conceded / match0.58
DravinjaDekani
45%Average possession49%
DravinjaDekani
5.08Shots on target / match3.5
DravinjaDekani

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.83Shots per match11.83
DravinjaDekani
5.08Shots on target3.5
DravinjaDekani
12.7%Shot conversion4.9%
DravinjaDekani
45%Possession49%
DravinjaDekani
1.62xG for1.53
DravinjaDekani
1.77xG against1.19
DravinjaDekani

Shooting quality

Dravinja: Counter-attackingDekani: Balanced
DravinjaDekani
Accuracy (shots on target)43%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dravinja
LLDWW
Season result split
25% W17% D58% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-7
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Dekani
WLWLD
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-4
1.33 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dravinja is 159% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Dravinja · 0.58 goals / match - Dekani

Dekani is 274% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.17 goals / match - Dravinja · 0.58 goals / match - Dekani

Dravinja scoring profile: strong

Dravinja scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 58% (7 of 12 matches).

Dekani scoring profile: strong

Dekani scores in 33% of matches (4 of 12 matches), while Dravinja keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 matches).

18Goals scored (season)7
DravinjaDekani
26Goals conceded (season)7
DravinjaDekani
3.67Average goals in match1.17
DravinjaDekani
11Goals scored (last 5)2
DravinjaDekani
9Goals conceded (last 5)3
DravinjaDekani

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal33%
DravinjaDekani
25%2 goals17%
DravinjaDekani
17%3 goals8%
DravinjaDekani
8%4 goals0%
DravinjaDekani

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal42%
DravinjaDekani
50%2 goals17%
DravinjaDekani
42%3 goals0%
DravinjaDekani
25%4 goals0%
DravinjaDekani

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

42%BTTS at half-time8%
DravinjaDekani
0%BTTS in both halves0%
DravinjaDekani
25%Scored in both halves17%
DravinjaDekani

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS8%
DravinjaDekani
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
DravinjaDekani
80%BTTS - last 50%
DravinjaDekani

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
DravinjaDekani
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
DravinjaDekani
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
DravinjaDekani

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time42%
DravinjaDekani
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
DravinjaDekani
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
DravinjaDekani

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dekani is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - Dravinja · 1.25 pts / match - Dekani

Dravinja - half-time state
8% leading50% draw42% trailing
Dekani - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)1.25
DravinjaDekani
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.42
DravinjaDekani
1.08Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
DravinjaDekani
1.67Average goals (1st half)0.75
DravinjaDekani
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
DravinjaDekani
50%No goal before half-time67%
DravinjaDekani

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)1.08
DravinjaDekani
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
DravinjaDekani
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.25
DravinjaDekani
2Average goals (2nd half)0.42
DravinjaDekani
25%Clean sheet after half-time75%
DravinjaDekani
42%No goal after half-time83%
DravinjaDekani

Dravinja - second-half results

25% W33% D42% L
9
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding313%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dekani - second-half results

17% W58% D25% L
15
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dravinja - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Dekani - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.60.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dravinja
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
0
5
16-30
3
4
31-45
2
4
46-60
6
5
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Dekani
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dravinja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
189%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Dekani

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.95
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
33%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

DravinjaLigaDekani
Average goals in match▲ 3.672.93▼ 1.17
Both teams scored▲ 75%46%▼ 8%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 67%56%▼ 17%
Clean sheets▼ 8%31%▲ 58%
Goal before half-time▼ 75%77%▼ 58%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%78%▼ 42%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.93
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+55%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+36%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Dravinja 0 - 1 - 1 Dekani. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

ND Dravinja Kostroj
1 : 1
NK Jadran Dekani
NK Jadran Dekani
3 : 0
ND Dravinja Kostroj

FAQ

What was the result of Dravinja vs Dekani?

The 2. SNL match finished Dravinja 1:0 Dekani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Dravinja and Dekani?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Dravinja won 0, Dekani won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Dravinja vs Dekani?

Dravinja score 1.50 goals per game on average and Dekani 0.58. The 2. SNL average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Dravinja's matches and 8% of Dekani's.

What form are Dravinja and Dekani in?

Over the last 5 games Dravinja have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Dekani 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dravinja vs Dekani?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.