Dravinja vs Krško: match statistics
Dravinja vs Krško: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Dravinja played Krško in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Dravinja: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Krško: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Dravinja scores 1.04 and concedes 1.54 goals per match. Krško scores 0.75 and concedes 2.14. League average: 2.81 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Dravinja 54%, Krško 43%. Over 2.5: Dravinja 43%, Krško 57%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Dravinja has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.22. Dravinja: 9.3 shots per match, Krško: 9.3.
Match halves
Dravinja: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.61. Krško: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.43.
Goals by minute
Dravinja: 31-45+ (7 goals). Krško: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). Dravinja sit 8th in the table while Krško are 14th; in the last 5 matches the hosts have 3 wins and 2 draws, averaging 2.2 points per match, whereas Krško have 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses with only 0.2 points per match. In attack Dravinja score 1.07 goals per home match with xG 1.4, average 9.5 shots and 3.29 on target with a conversion around 11%, while Krško away average 0.71 goals with xG 1.13 and conversion around 8%, having scored only 2 goals in the last 5 fixtures. Defensively the gap is clear: Krško concede 2.29 goals on average away (xG against 2.10) and have conceded 14 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas Dravinja concede 1.36 goals at home and conceded 4 goals in that period. Additionally the visitors have 50% of away matches without scoring and 0% clean sheets away, while the hosts have only 29% of matches without scoring and 21% clean sheets, therefore I assess probabilities as 70% for the hosts, 18% for a draw and 12% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season figures indicate both teams are vulnerable to conceding: Dravinja concedes 2.00 goals per match on average, Krško 2.29, and Krško has not recorded a single clean sheet (0%), increasing the likelihood of goals at both ends. Offensively Krško struggle for finishing — 0.71 goals this season and only 2 goals in the last 5 matches (0.4 per match), despite a recent xG of 1.37, meaning they create chances but fail to convert. Dravinja are stronger at home: 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4 per match) and 80% BTTS in those five fixtures, with season home xG of 1.30 versus xG against 1.82, showing potential both to score and to concede. Season-long BTTS figures are mixed (36% for Dravinja, 50% for Krško, league level 49%), but average shots on target 4.0 vs 3.43 and the high goals conceded by both teams push me toward a both teams to score scenario. Therefore I favour BTTS - Yes at 65% vs 35% for No, because the combined offensive signals (xG and shots) and Krško’s lack of clean sheets outweigh the visitors’ short-term finishing issues.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Aggregate xG suggests a match with over 3 goals: hosts have xG 1.30, while average xG conceded against Krško is 2.10, yielding roughly 1.70 expected goals for Dravinja; Krško have xG 1.13, and hosts concede 1.82 xG on average, translating to about 1.48 for the visitors, totalling ~3.18 goals. This season Dravinja have 93% of matches over 1.5 goals, Krško 79%, and the share of matches over 2.5 is 50% and 64% respectively, confirming a propensity for higher-scoring games. Defenses are porous — hosts concede on average 2.0 goals per game, Krško 2.29, and in the last 5 games Krško have shipped 14 goals (2.8 avg), increasing the likelihood of further goals. A probabilistic model based on the above xG gives ~83% chance for Over 1.5, ~62% for Over 2.5 and ~39% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest and clearest signal from the data is to play Over 1.5. Additionally, hosts average 10.07 shots (4.0 on target) with an 8% conversion rate, which against weak opposition defense should translate into several goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side are clearly in better form: over their last five matches they have a 'wdwwd' record (4 wins and 1 draw), representing a 60% win rate and an average of 1.4 goals per game, whereas the visitors have 'lldll' in their last five (0 wins), average 0.4 goals and concede 2.8 goals per game on average. Halftime scores are predominantly draws: the hosts were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches and score on average 0.4 goals by HT versus 0.2 for the visitors, so the HT pace is low. After the break the hosts clearly dominate — in their last five matches they average 1.0 goal in the second half while the visitors only 0.2, and the visitors concede 2.2 goals on average in second halves, which increases the likelihood of a turnaround. Additionally, the hosts’ xG is 1.30 versus 1.13 for the visitors, with average shots on target 4.0 vs 3.43, therefore the strongest scenario is a draw at halftime and a home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Dravinja | Krško | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Dravinja is 1000% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Dravinja · 0.2 pts / match - Krško
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Dravinja is 39% better for: goals scored per match.
1.04 goals / match - Dravinja · 0.75 goals / match - Krško
Dravinja is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.54 goals / match - Dravinja · 2.14 goals / match - Krško
Dravinja scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Krško keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 28 matches).
Krško scores in 50% of matches (14 of 28 matches), while Dravinja keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Dravinja
Over / Under - Krško
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Krško is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / match - Dravinja · 1.04 pts / match - Krško
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Dravinja - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Krško - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 21%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 2.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -10 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Dravinja
Krško
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Dravinja | Liga | Krško | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.57 | 2.81 | • 2.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 49% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 29% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 74% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 81% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- KrškoGoalPatrik Veselić
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Dravinja 0 - 0 - 1 Krško. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Dravinja vs Krško?
The 2. SNL match finished Dravinja 2:1 Krško. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Dravinja vs Krško?
Dravinja score 1.04 goals per game on average and Krško 0.75. The 2. SNL average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Dravinja's matches and 43% of Krško's.
What form are Dravinja and Krško in?
Over the last 5 games Dravinja have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Krško 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dravinja vs Krško?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


