Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Dreams vs Medeama: match statistics

Dreams crest
Dreams
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Medeama crest
Medeama
155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Dreams display impressive home form with a 62% win rate at home and a +11 goal difference, making them a formidable opponent on their own turf. Medeama, despite leading the table, is experiencing a clear form crisis – in the last 5 matches, they haven't won a single game, averaging just 0.8 points per match. The visitors struggle with efficiency away from home (42% of matches without scoring, only 0.92 goals on average), while the hosts score an average of 1.54 goals in home matches. The difference in xG (1.4 for Dreams vs 1.15 for Medeama away) and the current form of both teams point to a home victory. Medeama's high draw percentage away (50%) suggests that the visitors may focus on defense, hence a draw is also a realistic scenario.

Dreams vs Medeama: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dreams played Medeama in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match was played on 22 March 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Dreams: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Medeama: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dreams scores 1.12 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Medeama scores 1.32 and concedes 0.68. League average: 1.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dreams 44%, Medeama 52%. Over 2.5: Dreams 32%, Medeama 44%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 31%.

xG, shots and style

Medeama has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.28. Dreams: 6.5 shots per match, Medeama: 11.9.

Match halves

Dreams: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.60. Medeama: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Dreams: 61-75 (8 goals). Medeama: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 1.86 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 31%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Dreams display impressive home form with a 62% win rate at home and a +11 goal difference, making them a formidable opponent on their own turf. Medeama, despite leading the table, is experiencing a clear form crisis – in the last 5 matches, they haven't won a single game, averaging just 0.8 points per match. The visitors struggle with efficiency away from home (42% of matches without scoring, only 0.92 goals on average), while the hosts score an average of 1.54 goals in home matches. The difference in xG (1.4 for Dreams vs 1.15 for Medeama away) and the current form of both teams point to a home victory. Medeama's high draw percentage away (50%) suggests that the visitors may focus on defense, hence a draw is also a realistic scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
DreamsMedeama
6Shots5
DreamsMedeama
2Shots on target4
DreamsMedeama
0.97xG1.3
DreamsMedeama
1Corners5
DreamsMedeama
61Dangerous attacks97
DreamsMedeama
-1Fouls-1
DreamsMedeama
1Cards2
DreamsMedeama

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.12Goals scored / match1.32
DreamsMedeama
1Goals conceded / match0.68
DreamsMedeama
44%Average possession50%
DreamsMedeama
3.56Shots on target / match4.4
DreamsMedeama

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.52Shots per match11.92
DreamsMedeama
3.56Shots on target4.4
DreamsMedeama
17.2%Shot conversion11.1%
DreamsMedeama
44%Possession50%
DreamsMedeama
1.28xG for1.53
DreamsMedeama
1.43xG against1.14
DreamsMedeama

Shooting quality

Dreams: Counter-attackingMedeama: Balanced
DreamsMedeama
Accuracy (shots on target)55%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dreams is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Dreams · 0.6 pts / match - Medeama

Dreams
DLDWD
Season result split
32% W28% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-10
1.24 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Medeama
LDDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
48% W40% R12% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-3
1.84 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.12 goals / match - Dreams · 1.32 goals / match - Medeama

Medeama is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Dreams · 0.68 goals / match - Medeama

Dreams scoring profile: mixed

Dreams scores in 68% of matches (17 of 25 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (11 of 25 matches).

Medeama scoring profile: strong

Medeama scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Dreams keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 matches).

28Goals scored (season)33
DreamsMedeama
25Goals conceded (season)17
DreamsMedeama
2.12Average goals in match2
DreamsMedeama
4Goals scored (last 5)3
DreamsMedeama
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
DreamsMedeama

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal76%
DreamsMedeama
36%2 goals40%
DreamsMedeama
8%3 goals12%
DreamsMedeama
0%4 goals4%
DreamsMedeama

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal56%
DreamsMedeama
24%2 goals12%
DreamsMedeama
8%3 goals0%
DreamsMedeama
0%4 goals0%
DreamsMedeama

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time16%
DreamsMedeama
0%BTTS in both halves0%
DreamsMedeama
16%Scored in both halves28%
DreamsMedeama

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
DreamsMedeama
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
DreamsMedeama
40%BTTS - last 560%
DreamsMedeama

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
DreamsMedeama
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
DreamsMedeama
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
DreamsMedeama

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
DreamsMedeama
28%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
DreamsMedeama
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
DreamsMedeama

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Dreams · 1.52 pts / match - Medeama

Dreams - half-time state
28% leading48% draw24% trailing
Medeama - half-time state
36% leading44% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.52
DreamsMedeama
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.64
DreamsMedeama
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
DreamsMedeama
0.96Average goals (1st half)1
DreamsMedeama
60%Clean sheet before half-time68%
DreamsMedeama
64%No goal before half-time52%
DreamsMedeama

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.72
DreamsMedeama
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
DreamsMedeama
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
DreamsMedeama
1.16Average goals (2nd half)1
DreamsMedeama
52%Clean sheet after half-time76%
DreamsMedeama
52%No goal after half-time44%
DreamsMedeama

Dreams - second-half results

36% W32% R32% P
33
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Medeama - second-half results

44% W40% R16% P
38
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dreams - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dreams
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
5
4
16-30
4
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
8
3
61-75
2
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
9
3
16-30
4
4
31-45
2
4
46-60
5
2
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.06
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+46%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dreams

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
164%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
216%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

DreamsLigaMedeama
Average goals in match 2.121.86 2.00
Both teams scored 44%33% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%31% 44%
Clean sheets 32%43% 44%
Goal before half-time 60%59% 64%
Goal after half-time 80%61% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.86
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
43%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
0.61
Away goals / match
+105%
Home attack advantage
+51%
Home defence advantage
+41%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MedeamaYellow cardJacob Mensah
  2. DreamsGoalAdams Aminu
  3. DreamsYellow cardJohn Duku Antwi
  4. MedeamaGoalKelvin Nkrumah
  5. MedeamaYellow cardFuzy Taylor

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Dreams 0 - 0 - 1 Medeama. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Medeama
2 : 1
Dreams

FAQ

What was the result of Dreams vs Medeama?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Dreams 2:1 Medeama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dreams vs Medeama?

Dreams score 1.12 goals per game on average and Medeama 1.32. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Dreams's matches and 52% of Medeama's.

What form are Dreams and Medeama in?

Over the last 5 games Dreams have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Medeama 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dreams vs Medeama?

The statistical background for Dreams vs Medeama — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.