Dunav 2010 vs Vihren Sandanski: match statistics
Dunav 2010 displays absolutely dominant form, leading the table with an impressive record of 16 wins, 2 draws, and 0 losses. The hosts have won all of their last nine home matches, keeping clean sheets in 89% of their home games and conceding an average of just 0.11 goals per match. Vihren Sandanski, despite being third in the table, performs significantly worse away from home – winning only 40% of their away matches and conceding an average of as many as 1.8 goals per match. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.82 vs 1.27), and the goal difference in Dunav's home matches (+22) compared to Vihren's away matches (-2) is huge. Considering Dunav 2010's phenomenal home streak and the visitors' clear defensive issues on the road, the hosts are undoubtedly the favorites for this match.
Dunav 2010 vs Vihren Sandanski: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Dunav 2010 played Vihren Sandanski in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 1 March 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Dunav 2010: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Vihren Sandanski: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Dunav 2010 scores 2.17 and concedes 0.22 goals per match. Vihren Sandanski scores 1.90 and concedes 1.15. League average: 2.45 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Dunav 2010 22%, Vihren Sandanski 50%. Over 2.5: Dunav 2010 39%, Vihren Sandanski 55%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Vihren Sandanski has higher xG: 1.87 vs 1.72. Dunav 2010: 12.8 shots per match, Vihren Sandanski: 13.3.
Match halves
Dunav 2010: half-time lead 78%, second-half goals 1.06. Vihren Sandanski: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Dunav 2010: 0-15 (8 goals). Vihren Sandanski: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second League: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Dunav 2010 displays absolutely dominant form, leading the table with an impressive record of 16 wins, 2 draws, and 0 losses. The hosts have won all of their last nine home matches, keeping clean sheets in 89% of their home games and conceding an average of just 0.11 goals per match. Vihren Sandanski, despite being third in the table, performs significantly worse away from home – winning only 40% of their away matches and conceding an average of as many as 1.8 goals per match. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.82 vs 1.27), and the goal difference in Dunav's home matches (+22) compared to Vihren's away matches (-2) is huge. Considering Dunav 2010's phenomenal home streak and the visitors' clear defensive issues on the road, the hosts are undoubtedly the favorites for this match.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Dunav 2010 | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 61% | 62% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Dunav 2010 is 50% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Dunav 2010 · 2 pts / match - Vihren Sandanski
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Dunav 2010 is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
2.17 goals / match - Dunav 2010 · 1.9 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski
Dunav 2010 is 423% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.22 goals / match - Dunav 2010 · 1.15 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski
Dunav 2010 scores in 94% of matches (17 of 18 matches), while Vihren Sandanski keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).
Vihren Sandanski scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Dunav 2010 keeps a clean sheet in 78% (14 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Dunav 2010
Over / Under - Vihren Sandanski
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Dunav 2010 is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.5 pts / match - Dunav 2010 · 1.65 pts / match - Vihren Sandanski
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Dunav 2010 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 78% of matches and wins 89%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Vihren Sandanski - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Dunav 2010
Vihren Sandanski
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Dunav 2010 | Liga | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.39 | 2.45 | ▲ 3.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 22% | 44% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 42% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 78% | 33% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 69% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 73% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Dunav 2010GoalElisée Sou
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Dunav 2010 0 - 1 - 0 Vihren Sandanski. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Dunav 2010 vs Vihren Sandanski?
The Second League match finished Dunav 2010 2:2 Vihren Sandanski. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Dunav 2010 vs Vihren Sandanski?
Dunav 2010 score 2.17 goals per game on average and Vihren Sandanski 1.90. The Second League average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Dunav 2010's matches and 50% of Vihren Sandanski's.
What form are Dunav 2010 and Vihren Sandanski in?
Over the last 5 games Dunav 2010 have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Vihren Sandanski 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dunav 2010 vs Vihren Sandanski?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Dunav 2010 vs Vihren Sandanski: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.