Lithuania - A LygaTelšių centrinis stadionasData current as of 07 September 2026

Džiugas Telšiai vs Banga: match statistics

Džiugas Telšiai crest
Džiugas Telšiai
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Banga crest
Banga

Džiugas Telšiai vs Banga: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Džiugas Telšiai played Banga in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 19 July 2026. Venue: Telšių centrinis stadionas. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Džiugas Telšiai: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Banga: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Džiugas Telšiai scores 1.48 and concedes 1.05 goals per match. Banga scores 1.48 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Džiugas Telšiai 43%, Banga 33%. Over 2.5: Džiugas Telšiai 48%, Banga 38%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Banga has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.28. Džiugas Telšiai: 11.6 shots per match, Banga: 12.1.

Match halves

Džiugas Telšiai: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.00. Banga: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Džiugas Telšiai: 61-75 (9 goals). Banga: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-2. Average goals 0.83, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Banga sits 2nd in the table vs Džiugas in 4th and shows markedly better form: the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 9 goals, while Džiugas has failed to win in those five fixtures (0-3-2) and scored only 3 goals. Offensively Banga creates more high-quality situations — away they average 4.45 shots on target and have xG 1.49, whereas Džiugas at home records 3.33 shots on target and xG 1.23; the hosts do have a higher conversion rate (13% vs 9%) but generate fewer chances. Defensively Banga’s advantage is clear: the visitors concede only 0.45 goals per away game on average and keep 55% clean sheets, while Džiugas concedes 1.08 goals per home game and has 50% clean sheets. Additionally Banga averages 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches vs 0.6 for Džiugas, and in those five games conceded only 1 goal compared to the hosts’ 5. Considering the superior xG (1.49 vs 1.23), higher number of shots on target (4.45 vs 3.33) and significantly tighter defense (0.45 vs 1.08 goals conceded), I predict an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistical analysis supports a “No” scenario — I estimate 35% chance for BTTS and 65% for No Goal. Banga has 55% clean sheets this season and concedes 0.45 goals per match on average, with only 0.2 goals conceded in the last 5 matches (1 goal in 5), which significantly lowers the likelihood of both teams scoring. Džiugas averages 1.9 goals per match season-to-date and has season BTTS 50%, but in the last 5 matches he scored only 3 goals (0.6 per match) and conceded 5 goals (1.0 per match), so his ability to guarantee a goal is weakened. Additionally Banga has a low season BTTS of 18% (20% in the last 5), and the league features a high clean sheet rate of 64%, which further favors a No Goal outcome. Although xG shows 1.29 for Džiugas and 1.49 for Banga, suggesting offensive potential on both sides, the visitors’ consistent defense gives the edge to No — so I pick BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model yields expected goals: home offensive xG 1.29 and xG against for visitors 1.08 produce 1.19 expected goals for Džiugas, while visitors’ xG 1.49 and xG against for hosts 1.36 produce 1.42 for Banga, totaling 2.61. The Poisson distribution for lambda=2.61 indicates probability of over 1.5 goals around 73%, over 2.5 around 48% and over 3.5 around 27%. Seasonal metrics confirm a tendency toward at least two goals: hosts have 80% of matches with over 1.5 goals, visitors 36%, and hosts have a higher shot conversion 16% versus visitors’ 9%. At the same time visitors kept a clean sheet in 55% of games, which limits the likelihood of a very high-scoring outcome and explains why Over 2.5 is only marginally below 50%. As a result the strongest signal is an Over at the 1.5 line, since the model (2.61 goals, ~73% for Over 1.5) together with seasonal figures and form favor at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Half-time analysis indicates the home side leads at the break in 40% of matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 40), scoring an average of 0.9 goals before halftime versus 0.36 for the visitors (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.9 vs scoredAVGHT_away = 0.36), which favors a home lead in the first half. Over the full match the home team also posts higher goals per game, 1.9 versus 1.09 (seasonScoredAVG_home = 1.9 vs seasonScoredAVG_away = 1.09), and a superior shot conversion rate of 16% compared to 9% (shot_conversion_rate_home = 16.0 vs shot_conversion_rate_away = 9.0), and their second-half performance is strong (wins_2hg_percentage_home = 60%), so retaining the lead is likely. The away side, however, carry an excellent run in their last five matches (form_l5_away = "dwwww", last5_winPercentage_overall_away = 80%) and a higher xG of 1.49 versus the home 1.29 (xg_for_avg_away = 1.49 vs xg_for_avg_home = 1.29), which increases the probability of a turnaround after halftime. Considering the balance—40% chance of a home lead at halftime, their superior efficiency and the visitors’ low BTTS rate (seasonBTTSPercentage_away = 18%)—the most probable scenario is 1/1 (home lead at Half-Time and home win at Full-Time), hence I assign it the highest probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
5Shots8
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
3Shots on target1
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
0.78xG0.96
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
1Corners7
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
33Dangerous attacks52
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
20Fouls9
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
4Cards1
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
1.48Goals scored / match1.48
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
1.05Goals conceded / match0.67
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
51%Average possession45%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
3.38Shots on target / match4.14
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.57Shots per match12.1
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
3.38Shots on target4.14
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
12.8%Shot conversion12.2%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
51%Possession45%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
1.28xG for1.39
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
1.12xG against1.21
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga

Shooting quality

Džiugas Telšiai: BalancedBanga: Counter-attacking
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
Accuracy (shots on target)29%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Banga is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Džiugas Telšiai · 2.6 pts / match - Banga

Džiugas Telšiai
WDLDD
Season result split
48% W29% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-5
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Banga
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
48% W29% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-5
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Banga is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.05 goals / match - Džiugas Telšiai · 0.67 goals / match - Banga

Džiugas Telšiai scoring profile: strong

Džiugas Telšiai scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).

Banga scoring profile: mixed

Banga scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Džiugas Telšiai keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 matches).

31Goals scored (season)31
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
22Goals conceded (season)14
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
2.52Average goals in match2.14
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
6Goals scored (last 5)9
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
6Goals conceded (last 5)1
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal67%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
38%2 goals48%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
24%3 goals19%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
10%4 goals10%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal57%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
38%2 goals10%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
14%3 goals0%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
0%4 goals0%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
Džiugas Telšiai - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 21 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time14%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
14%BTTS in both halves0%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
29%Scored in both halves29%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
60%BTTS - last 520%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Banga is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - Džiugas Telšiai · 1.38 pts / match - Banga

Džiugas Telšiai - half-time state
14% leading67% draw19% trailing
Banga - half-time state
29% leading52% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.38
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
0.48Goals scored (1st half)0.62
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
0.9Average goals (1st half)0.95
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
62%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
67%No goal before half-time62%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga

After half-time (2nd half)

1.81Points per match (2nd half)1.81
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
1.62Average goals (2nd half)1.19
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
57%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga
29%No goal after half-time43%
Džiugas TelšiaiBanga

Džiugas Telšiai - second-half results

52% W24% R24% P
23
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding343%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Banga - second-half results

52% W24% R24% P
29
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding166%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Džiugas Telšiai - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Banga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+7
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Džiugas Telšiai
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
1
31-45
3
5
46-60
9
3
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Banga
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
6
1
16-30
2
4
31-45
6
0
46-60
4
3
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.34
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Džiugas Telšiai

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Banga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.89
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

Džiugas TelšiaiLigaBanga
Average goals in match 2.522.59 2.14
Both teams scored 43%49% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%54% 38%
Clean sheets 48%32% 43%
Goal before half-time 52%68% 52%
Goal after half-time 86%77% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Džiugas TelšiaiYellow cardValentino Vermeulen
  2. Džiugas TelšiaiYellow cardIbrahim Cisse
  3. Džiugas TelšiaiGoalIbrahim Cisse
  4. Džiugas TelšiaiYellow cardLukas Ankudinovas
  5. BangaYellow cardValdas Antužis
  6. Džiugas TelšiaiYellow cardDeitonas Vinckus
  7. BangaSubstitutionOn: Maksim AndrejevOff: Ignas Venckus
  8. Džiugas TelšiaiSubstitutionOn: Iker Ezequiel ScottoOff: Deitonas Vinckus
  9. Džiugas TelšiaiSubstitutionOn: Tomas StelmokasOff: Ronald Sobowale

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Džiugas Telšiai 3 - 1 - 2 Banga. Average goals 0.83, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Džiugas Telšiai
0 : 1
Banga
Banga
0 : 1
Džiugas Telšiai
FK Banga Gargždai
0 : 1
FK Džiugas Telšiai
FK Džiugas Telšiai
0 : 0
FK Banga Gargždai
FK Džiugas Telšiai
0 : 1
FK Banga Gargždai
FK Banga Gargždai
0 : 1
FK Džiugas Telšiai

FAQ

What was the result of Džiugas Telšiai vs Banga?

The A Lyga match finished Džiugas Telšiai 1:0 Banga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Džiugas Telšiai and Banga?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Džiugas Telšiai won 3, Banga won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Džiugas Telšiai vs Banga?

Džiugas Telšiai score 1.48 goals per game on average and Banga 1.48. The A Lyga average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Džiugas Telšiai's matches and 33% of Banga's.

What form are Džiugas Telšiai and Banga in?

Over the last 5 games Džiugas Telšiai have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Banga 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Džiugas Telšiai vs Banga?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Džiugas Telšiai vs Banga: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.