Norway - First DivisionEgersund IdrettsparkenData current as of 19 September 2026

Egersund vs Kongsvinger: match statistics

Egersund crest
Egersund
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Kongsvinger crest
Kongsvinger

Egersund vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Egersund played Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: Egersund Idrettsparken. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Egersund: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Kongsvinger: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Egersund scores 1.62 and concedes 1.81 goals per match. Kongsvinger scores 2.95 and concedes 1.57. League average: 3.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Egersund 48%, Kongsvinger 81%. Over 2.5: Egersund 71%, Kongsvinger 86%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 72%.

xG, shots and style

Kongsvinger has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.41. Egersund: 11.1 shots per match, Kongsvinger: 14.3.

Match halves

Egersund: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.86. Kongsvinger: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 1.76.

Goals by minute

Egersund: 46-60 (8 goals). Kongsvinger: 46-60 (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.85 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 72%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kongsvinger sit 1st, having won 14 of their 21 matches and remaining unbeaten in their last five games, with 4 wins and 1 draw. Over the same period, Egersund have managed just 1 win, 2 draws and 2 defeats, while their defence has conceded as many as 12 goals in their last five appearances. The visitors are significantly more effective away from home, averaging 2.20 goals with an 18% shot conversion rate, whereas the hosts score 1.64 goals at home and convert 13% of their attempts. Kongsvinger also register more shots on target per match, 5.20 compared with 4.18, and fail to score in just 10% of their away games, compared with 36% of Egersund’s home matches. Although the two teams’ xG figures are similar—1.52 for the visitors and 1.50 for the hosts—the current form and attacking advantage point towards a Kongsvinger victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Egersund have recorded BTTS in 91% of their matches, compared with 70% for Kongsvinger and a league average of 64%, clearly supporting goals from both sides. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in 91% of matches and concede an average of 1.82 goals, while the visitors score an average of 2.20 goals with an xG of 1.52. Kongsvinger are also vulnerable defensively, conceding an average of 1.30 goals and keeping a clean sheet in only 20% of matches, while Egersund create an average of 2.00 xG. In their last five matches, Egersund conceded 2.4 goals per game, while Kongsvinger scored as many as 6.2, so the visitors’ attacking form further increases the likelihood of them finding the net. Although the hosts recorded BTTS in only 60% of their last five matches, the combination of their high attacking potential and the defensive vulnerability of both teams makes a goal for each side more likely. In betting terms, this supports BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal rather than BTTS - No, which only requires at least one team to fail to score and does not automatically mean a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as Egersund cleared this line in 100% of their matches this season, while Kongsvinger did so in 90%. The hosts have an average xG of 2.00, whereas the visitors’ defense concedes an average of 1.63 xG, supporting a projection of around 1.70 goals for Egersund. Kongsvinger produce an average of 1.52 xG, while Egersund allow opponents 1.47 xG; additionally, the visitors have scored as many as 31 goals in their last 5 matches. Both teams had at least three goals in 80% of their last five matches, but the 1.5 line offers a clearly greater safety margin than higher thresholds.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Kongsvinger are in significantly better current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches and remain unbeaten, while Egersund have managed just 1 victory and lost 2 games over the same period. The visitors led at the break in 80% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.4 goals before half-time, whereas the hosts conceded 1.2 goals during that period. Kongsvinger’s advantage is also evident after the interval, having scored an average of 3.8 goals in their last five appearances and recording a +14 goal difference, compared with Egersund’s average of just 0.6 goals scored. Although the hosts have very strong home-season statistics, their current defence is conceding an average of 2.4 goals per match, making the most likely scenario a Kongsvinger lead at half-time followed by a win at full-time: HT/FT 2/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
EgersundKongsvinger
17Shots6
EgersundKongsvinger
8Shots on target5
EgersundKongsvinger
2.14xG1.12
EgersundKongsvinger
12Corners0
EgersundKongsvinger
70Dangerous attacks52
EgersundKongsvinger
19Fouls20
EgersundKongsvinger
2Cards1
EgersundKongsvinger

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

EgersundKongsvinger
1.62Goals scored / match2.95
EgersundKongsvinger
1.81Goals conceded / match1.57
EgersundKongsvinger
52%Average possession54%
EgersundKongsvinger
4Shots on target / match5.95
EgersundKongsvinger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.14Shots per match14.33
EgersundKongsvinger
4Shots on target5.95
EgersundKongsvinger
14.5%Shot conversion20.6%
EgersundKongsvinger
52%Possession54%
EgersundKongsvinger
1.41xG for1.77
EgersundKongsvinger
1.48xG against1.54
EgersundKongsvinger

Shooting quality

Egersund: Efficient finishingKongsvinger: Attacking
EgersundKongsvinger
Accuracy (shots on target)36%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kongsvinger is 160% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Egersund · 2.6 pts / match - Kongsvinger

Egersund
WLLDD
Season result split
38% W19% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-9
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Kongsvinger
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W19% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-4-3
2.19 pts / match · goal difference +29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-2
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.95Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kongsvinger is 82% better for: goals scored per match.

1.62 goals / match - Egersund · 2.95 goals / match - Kongsvinger

Kongsvinger is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.81 goals / match - Egersund · 1.57 goals / match - Kongsvinger

Egersund scoring profile: very strong

Egersund scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

Kongsvinger scoring profile: very strong

Kongsvinger scores in 95% of matches (20 of 21 matches), while Egersund keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).

34Goals scored (season)62
EgersundKongsvinger
38Goals conceded (season)33
EgersundKongsvinger
3.43Average goals in match4.52
EgersundKongsvinger
5Goals scored (last 5)19
EgersundKongsvinger
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
EgersundKongsvinger

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal95%
EgersundKongsvinger
52%2 goals81%
EgersundKongsvinger
24%3 goals52%
EgersundKongsvinger
5%4 goals29%
EgersundKongsvinger

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal86%
EgersundKongsvinger
52%2 goals38%
EgersundKongsvinger
38%3 goals19%
EgersundKongsvinger
19%4 goals14%
EgersundKongsvinger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time29%
EgersundKongsvinger
14%BTTS in both halves10%
EgersundKongsvinger
33%Scored in both halves52%
EgersundKongsvinger

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS76%
EgersundKongsvinger
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
EgersundKongsvinger
40%BTTS - last 580%
EgersundKongsvinger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
EgersundKongsvinger
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
EgersundKongsvinger
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
EgersundKongsvinger

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
EgersundKongsvinger
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
EgersundKongsvinger
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time52%
EgersundKongsvinger

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kongsvinger is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Egersund · 1.67 pts / match - Kongsvinger

Egersund - half-time state
38% leading24% draw38% trailing
Kongsvinger - half-time state
48% leading24% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.67
EgersundKongsvinger
0.76Goals scored (1st half)1.19
EgersundKongsvinger
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
EgersundKongsvinger
1.62Average goals (1st half)1.86
EgersundKongsvinger
52%Clean sheet before half-time52%
EgersundKongsvinger
52%No goal before half-time33%
EgersundKongsvinger

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.95
EgersundKongsvinger
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)1.76
EgersundKongsvinger
0.95Goals conceded (2nd half)0.9
EgersundKongsvinger
1.81Average goals (2nd half)2.67
EgersundKongsvinger
38%Clean sheet after half-time38%
EgersundKongsvinger
38%No goal after half-time19%
EgersundKongsvinger

Egersund - second-half results

33% W38% D29% L
29
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kongsvinger - second-half results

57% W24% D19% L
35
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Egersund - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Kongsvinger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.42.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.83.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%80%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+5+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Egersund
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
5
5
16-30
7
9
31-45
8
6
46-60
4
3
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Kongsvinger
ScoredConceded
9
3
0-15
10
3
16-30
6
8
31-45
15
5
46-60
9
5
61-75
13
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 2.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Egersund

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Kongsvinger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
174%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

EgersundLigaKongsvinger
Average goals in match 3.433.85 4.52
Both teams scored 48%63% 81%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%72% 86%
Clean sheets 33%19% 14%
Goal before half-time 81%77% 86%
Goal after half-time 86%89% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.85
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
72%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
2.15
Home goals / match
1.70
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
37%
3 goals
18%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. EgersundYellow cardHorenus Taddese
  2. EgersundSubstitutionOn: Phillip HovlandOff: Herman Kleppa
  3. EgersundGoalJan Inge LynumAssist: Chris Sleveland
  4. KongsvingerSubstitutionOn: Peder Herman Jorsett UdnæsOff: Þorlákur Baxter
  5. KongsvingerYellow cardMathias Berg Gjerstrøm
  6. EgersundSubstitutionOn: Hinrik HarðarsonOff: Nicolaj Tornvig Hansen
  7. EgersundYellow cardStian Rokås Michalsen
  8. EgersundSubstitutionOn: Oliver Toft NorengOff: Stian Rokås Michalsen
  9. KongsvingerSubstitutionOn: Saadiq Faisal ElmiOff: Mads Sande

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Egersund 0 - 1 - 2 Kongsvinger. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Kongsvinger
2 : 1
Egersund
Kongsvinger IL
2 : 1
Egersunds IK
Egersunds IK
2 : 2
Kongsvinger IL

FAQ

What was the result of Egersund vs Kongsvinger?

The First Division match finished Egersund 1:1 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Egersund and Kongsvinger?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Egersund won 0, Kongsvinger won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Egersund vs Kongsvinger?

Egersund score 1.62 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.95. The First Division average is 3.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Egersund's matches and 81% of Kongsvinger's.

What form are Egersund and Kongsvinger in?

Over the last 5 games Egersund have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Kongsvinger 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Egersund vs Kongsvinger?

The statistical background for Egersund vs Kongsvinger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.