EIF vs JIPPO: match statistics
EIF vs JIPPO: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
EIF played JIPPO in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Ekenäs Centrumplan. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
EIF: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. JIPPO: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
EIF scores 1.30 and concedes 1.55 goals per match. JIPPO scores 1.35 and concedes 0.85. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: EIF 40%, JIPPO 45%. Over 2.5: EIF 50%, JIPPO 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
JIPPO has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.44. EIF: 11.4 shots per match, JIPPO: 13.5.
Match halves
EIF: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.70. JIPPO: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). JIPPO: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-2. Average goals 3.20, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
EIF is rated higher primarily due to its current form: it has won 3 of its last 5 matches and conceded only 1 goal during that run. At home, the hosts win 60% of their matches, average 1.5 goals scored, and keep a clean sheet in 40% of their appearances. JIPPO may sit 4th, two places above EIF, and have conceded just 17 goals over the course of the season compared with their opponent’s 31, but their last five matches include 2 defeats and 6 goals conceded. The visitors are dangerous away from home, averaging 1.7 goals scored with a 15% conversion rate, but EIF can take advantage of its current defensive stability. The closely matched xG figures—1.42 for EIF and 1.38 for JIPPO—point to a tight game; however, home advantage gives the hosts a slight edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as EIF concede an average of just 0.5 goals per match, keep a clean sheet in 50% of their games, and have conceded only 1 goal in total across their last five matches. BTTS has landed in just 30% of EIF’s matches this season and not once in their last five appearances, well below the league average of 44%. JIPPO are the more dangerous attacking side, scoring 1.7 goals per match this season, but they have averaged only 1.0 goal recently, and EIF should limit their effectiveness with a solid defensive display. The hosts also do not guarantee a high-scoring game: despite an average xG of 1.89, they score just 1.0 goal per match and convert only 6% of their shots. Therefore, the scenario in which at least one team fails to score is more likely than both teams finding the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
EIF are very solid defensively, conceding just 0.5 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 50% of their games, which limits JIPPO’s attacking potential. In their last five matches, the hosts have conceded only 1 goal, and none of those games produced more than 2 goals. JIPPO score an average of 1.7 goals, but their projection is lower against EIF’s defense; additionally, the visitors create an average of 1.38 xG compared with the 0.86 xG conceded by the hosts over the entire season. Historically, under 3.5 goals has landed in 90% of EIF matches and 70% of JIPPO matches, making Under 3.5 the clear value option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as EIF were level after 45 minutes in 7 of their 10 matches, including 3 of their last 5. The hosts concede just 0.1 goals per match before the break and have kept a clean sheet in the first half in 90% of their games, significantly limiting JIPPO’s chances of taking an early lead. After the interval, however, EIF have stronger foundations for turning the match in their favour: they average 1.89 xG compared with the visitors’ 1.38, and record 5.8 shots on target per match versus JIPPO’s 3.9. Recent form also favours the hosts, who averaged 2.0 points per game across their previous five outings and conceded only 0.2 goals per match during that run, while JIPPO suffered 2 defeats. The X/1 scenario is further supported by the fact that the visitors concede an average of 0.5 goals after half-time, while EIF have scored as many as 5 of their goals between the 76th and 90th minutes.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| EIF | JIPPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
EIF is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - EIF · 1.4 pts / match - JIPPO
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JIPPO is 82% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.55 goals / match - EIF · 0.85 goals / match - JIPPO
EIF scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).
JIPPO scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - EIF
Over / Under - JIPPO
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JIPPO is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - EIF · 1.4 pts / match - JIPPO
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
EIF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
JIPPO - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
EIF
JIPPO
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| EIF | Liga | JIPPO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.85 | 2.49 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 44% | • 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 32% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 63% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 71% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): EIF 0 - 3 - 2 JIPPO. Average goals 3.20, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of EIF vs JIPPO?
The Ykkösliiga match finished EIF 0:2 JIPPO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between EIF and JIPPO?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches EIF won 0, JIPPO won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 3.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before EIF vs JIPPO?
EIF score 1.30 goals per game on average and JIPPO 1.35. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 40% of EIF's matches and 45% of JIPPO's.
What form are EIF and JIPPO in?
Over the last 5 games EIF have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and JIPPO 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for EIF vs JIPPO?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


