El Entag El Harby vs Proxy: match statistics
El Entag El Harby vs Proxy: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
El Entag El Harby played Proxy in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 16 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
El Entag El Harby: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Proxy: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
El Entag El Harby scores 1.14 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. Proxy scores 1.03 and concedes 0.90. League average: 1.89 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: El Entag El Harby 59%, Proxy 55%. Over 2.5: El Entag El Harby 48%, Proxy 31%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 31%.
xG, shots and style
Proxy has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.28. El Entag El Harby: 8.3 shots per match, Proxy: 8.2.
Match halves
El Entag El Harby: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.76. Proxy: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
El Entag El Harby: 76-90+ (10 goals). Proxy: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.89 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 31%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw. Both teams have identical form over the last 5 matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and average 1.8 points per game in that period. Proxy sits higher in the table (7th vs 11th) and is superior defensively — conceding 1.00 goal on the road with 43% clean sheets, while El Entag at home concedes 1.43 goals with 29% clean sheets. The visitors are also more efficient in attack: Proxy averages 1.21 goals away, has a conversion rate of 15% and 21% of matches without scoring, whereas El Entag at home averages 0.79 goals, 8% conversion and 43% of matches without scoring; nonetheless the hosts have higher possession (51% vs 45%) and slightly more shots on target (3.83 vs 3.64). In the last 5 meetings El Entag scored 7 and conceded 4, while Proxy scored 4 and conceded 2, indicating the hosts have been more productive offensively recently but the visitors are more stable defensively. Considering the high draw ratios (away draws 50%, home draws 43%) and similar xG (1.28 for El Entag vs 1.30 for Proxy), a share of points is the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have BTTS rates of 53% (home) and 57% (away) this season, versus a league average of only 40%, which is a primary signal in favor of a "both score" scenario. xG indicates the home side generates 1.45 xG per match while the away defense concedes 1.48 xG, and the visitors produce 1.30 xG against a home defense conceding 1.12 xG — hence both teams create chances (1.45 vs 1.48 and 1.30 vs 1.12). Although the homes score on average 0.87 goals per game and the guests 1.21, seasonal goal tallies are 33 scored/41 conceded for the home team and 30 scored/26 conceded for the away team, which increases the likelihood of both finding the net. Counterbalancing factors are the high clean sheet rates: 40% for home, 43% for away and as high as 78% league-wide, plus a difference in shooting accuracy of 9% (home) vs 15% (away), which slightly reduces BTTS probability. Final assessment: a moderate lean towards BTTS - Yes at approximately 60% vs 40% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: the home attack has xG_for 1.45 while the away defense has xG_against 1.48, yielding approximately 1.47 expected goals for El Entag; the away attack xG_for 1.30 and the home defense xG_against 1.12 give about 1.21 for Proxy, totaling 2.68 expected goals. A Poisson model for a 2.68 total shows probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) around 75%, at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) around 50% and at least 4 goals (Over 3.5) around 28%. Seasonal indicators support this bias: matches over 1.5 stand at 53% for home teams and 64% for away teams, while BTTS is 53% and 57%, indicating regular scoring from both sides. Additionally, the home side scored 7 goals in the last 5 games (avg 1.4), the away side 4 goals (0.8), and total shots on target 4.0 + 3.64 = 7.64 provide sufficient chance volume, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X), as both teams frequently share points: home teams draw in 53% of matches, away teams in 50%, and in the last five games each side has a 60% draw rate. There is a particularly strong signal for a draw at the break — homes are level at half-time in 73% of matches and lead at the break in only 7% of games, while the average goals by half-time are just 0.27 for the home side and 0.57 for the visitors. The second half brings more goals and opportunities for a decision: on average homes score 1.00 goals after the break, visitors 1.29, but homes win the second half more often (47% versus 28%), so if the HT/FT X/X is broken, a turnaround in favour of the home team is more likely than one for the away side. Additionally, xG is similar (1.45 for homes vs 1.30 for guests), confirming the balanced nature of the match and favouring another draw over a decisive win for either side.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| El Entag El Harby | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
El Entag El Harby is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.14 goals / match - El Entag El Harby · 1.03 goals / match - Proxy
Proxy is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.41 goals / match - El Entag El Harby · 0.9 goals / match - Proxy
El Entag El Harby scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 41% (12 of 29 matches).
Proxy scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while El Entag El Harby keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - El Entag El Harby
Over / Under - Proxy
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Proxy is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / match - El Entag El Harby · 1.24 pts / match - Proxy
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
El Entag El Harby - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Proxy - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
El Entag El Harby
Proxy
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| El Entag El Harby | Liga | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.55 | 1.89 | • 1.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 40% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 31% | • 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 39% | ▲ 41% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 59% | 51% | ▲ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 67% | • 66% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- ProxyGoalMostafa Adel Abdel sattar
- El Entag El HarbyGoalArafat Mohammad Fahid Al Haj Ibrahim
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: El Entag El Harby 0 - 0 - 1 Proxy. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of El Entag El Harby vs Proxy?
The Second Division match finished El Entag El Harby 1:2 Proxy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before El Entag El Harby vs Proxy?
El Entag El Harby score 1.14 goals per game on average and Proxy 1.03. The Second Division average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 59% of El Entag El Harby's matches and 55% of Proxy's.
What form are El Entag El Harby and Proxy in?
Over the last 5 games El Entag El Harby have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Proxy 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for El Entag El Harby vs Proxy?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for El Entag El Harby vs Proxy: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


