El Entag El Harby vs Tersana: match statistics
El Entag El Harby vs Tersana: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
El Entag El Harby played Tersana in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 14 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
El Entag El Harby: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Tersana: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
El Entag El Harby scores 1.12 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Tersana scores 0.91 and concedes 0.94. League average: 1.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: El Entag El Harby 55%, Tersana 39%. Over 2.5: El Entag El Harby 52%, Tersana 27%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Tersana has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.26. El Entag El Harby: 8.0 shots per match, Tersana: 8.4.
Match halves
El Entag El Harby: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.76. Tersana: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.39.
Goals by minute
El Entag El Harby: 61-75 (10 goals). Tersana: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I forecast a draw (X) because Tersana is in better form over the last 5 matches (2 wins and 3 draws, 7 goals scored, 1.8 points per game), while El Entag in that period has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses with 6 goals and 1.0 point per game. The hosts have a slight offensive edge at home: on average 10 shots and 3.79 shots on target per match, 0.94 goals per match and xG 1.27 versus 8.46 shots, 2.85 on target, 0.63 goals and xG 1.11 for the visitors. Defensively Tersana is favored — the away side concedes on average 1.00 goal away and has xG against 1.15, while El Entag at home concedes 1.38 goals and has xG against 1.43, indicating greater vulnerability for the hosts. Additionally, Tersana has as many as 50% draws away and has not lost in the last 5 matches, whereas El Entag wins at home in only 19% of matches and has 38% draws, so the statistics suggest a low-scoring game with a high probability of shared points. As a result I give about a 30% chance to the hosts, 45% for a draw and 25% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Historical signal is for “No”: seasonal BTTS rates are 41% for El Entag and 38% for Tersana, while league average BTTS is 40%, indicating both teams score less than half the matches. Seasonal goals averages show El Entag scores 1.18 and concedes 0.88, whereas Tersana only 0.63 scored and 1.00 conceded; Tersana’s low scoring average (0.63) reduces the likelihood of BTTS, despite combined xG of 1.41 + 1.11 = 2.52. Additionally, El Entag averages 4.75 shots on target per match with an 11% conversion rate, and Tersana only 2.85 SOT and 8% conversion, indicating the away side less frequently creates and converts chances. In the last 5 matches Tersana shows higher BTTS rates (60%) and averages 1.4 goals and 0.8 conceded, but the seasonal team profiles and the high league clean sheet rate (76%) plus 41% clean sheets for El Entag versus 31% for Tersana give a stronger signal for No Goal/Goal to fail; therefore I predict “No”.}
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.28 expected goals for El Entag El Harby (xG 1.41 versus Tersany defense xG 1.15) and 1.14 for Tersany (xG 1.11 versus home defense xG 1.16), totaling 2.42 expected goals. With lambda=2.42, a Poisson distribution yields roughly a 69.6% probability of at least 2 goals in the match (hence Over 1.5 ≈70%), while the probability for Over 2.5 is only about 44% and for Over 3.5 about 23%. Seasonal indicators support this view: Over 0.5 occurs in 76% of home matches and 81% of away matches, whereas season Over 2.5 rates are 35% (home) and 19% (away), which favors the Under at the 2.5 line. Additionally, the hosts average 4.75 SOT and 10.69 total shots with an 11% conversion versus Tersany’s 2.85 SOT, 8.46 shots and 8% conversion, which increases the likelihood of at least two goals — therefore the recommendation is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X): the home side were level at the break in 71% of matches and the away side in 69%, hence a strong signal for a draw HT. There are few goals before the break: the home team averages 0.71 goals scored and 0.18 conceded by half-time, while the away team averages 0.31 scored and 0.63 conceded, supporting a low-scoring first half. The second half gives the hosts a measurable advantage in xG and shots (home xG 1.41 versus 1.11 and 4.75 shots on target versus 2.85), but season-long draw rates are high (draws 41% for homes and 50% for aways), so a large share of matches finish level. Considering the 71% rate of draws at the break and the markedly higher seasonal draw percentages, the X/X Half-Time/Full-Time scenario receives the highest probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| El Entag El Harby | Tersana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tersana is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - El Entag El Harby · 1.8 pts / match - Tersana
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
El Entag El Harby is 23% better for: goals scored per match.
1.12 goals / match - El Entag El Harby · 0.91 goals / match - Tersana
Tersana is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.39 goals / match - El Entag El Harby · 0.94 goals / match - Tersana
El Entag El Harby scores in 70% of matches (23 of 33 matches), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).
Tersana scores in 55% of matches (18 of 33 matches), while El Entag El Harby keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - El Entag El Harby
Over / Under - Tersana
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tersana is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.12 pts / match - El Entag El Harby · 1.24 pts / match - Tersana
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
El Entag El Harby - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tersana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
El Entag El Harby
Tersana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| El Entag El Harby | Liga | Tersana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.52 | 1.95 | • 1.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 41% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 52% | 32% | ▼ 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 38% | ▼ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 58% | 53% | • 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 68% | ▼ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- El Entag El HarbyGoalAlaa Shaaban
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: El Entag El Harby 0 - 0 - 1 Tersana. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of El Entag El Harby vs Tersana?
The Second Division match finished El Entag El Harby 1:1 Tersana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before El Entag El Harby vs Tersana?
El Entag El Harby score 1.12 goals per game on average and Tersana 0.91. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 55% of El Entag El Harby's matches and 39% of Tersana's.
What form are El Entag El Harby and Tersana in?
Over the last 5 games El Entag El Harby have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tersana 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for El Entag El Harby vs Tersana?
The statistical background for El Entag El Harby vs Tersana — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


