El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington: match statistics
El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
El Paso Locomotive played Lexington in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 31 May 2026. Final score: 1:4.
Current form
El Paso Locomotive: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Lexington: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
El Paso Locomotive scores 2.22 and concedes 1.78 goals per match. Lexington scores 1.10 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.72 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: El Paso Locomotive 78%, Lexington 60%. Over 2.5: El Paso Locomotive 100%, Lexington 60%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
El Paso Locomotive has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.39. El Paso Locomotive: 13.0 shots per match, Lexington: 11.9.
Match halves
El Paso Locomotive: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.89. Lexington: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
El Paso Locomotive: 46-60 (6 goals). Lexington: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
El Paso emerges as the favorite: at home they average 2.0 goals per match with 14.5 shots and 6 shots on target, and their home xG is 1.7 versus Lexington’s 1.2 xG on the road. The hosts have scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.4 points in that span; Lexington also averages 1.4 points over the last 5, but on the road they register only 0.6 goals per game on average and 0% away wins. El Paso’s defense is, however, vulnerable — at home they concede 2.75 goals per match on average and have no clean sheets (0%), which gives the visitors a chance. Lexington additionally has poor away efficiency: 6% shot conversion, an average of 2.8 shots on target and 40% of away matches without a goal. Considering the clearer chance-creation quality from the hosts (14.5 shots and 1.7 xG) and the visitors’ weak away form, I predict an El Paso victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS - Yes comes from both teams having season BTTS rates at 60% (El Paso 60% and Lexington 60%), with BTTS at 80% in the last 5 matches for each side. El Paso creates the most chances: averaging 1.6 goals per match, xG 1.57, 14.0 shots and 5.0 shots on target with an 11% conversion rate, increasing the likelihood the hosts will score. Lexington has only 0.6 goals per match and a 6% conversion rate on the season, but scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 avg) and also recorded 80% BTTS, so the visitors have recently been able to reply with goals. Defensively both teams are prone to conceding: El Paso concedes 1.2 goals on the season (1.8 in the last 5), and Lexington concedes 1.6 goals both on the season and in the last 5, while the league BTTS is 56% with an average goals of 2.79, all of which supports an exchange of goals. On this basis I select BTTS = yes with an estimated probability of 80% versus 20% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A model based on average xG and opponent defense indicates about 1.47 goals for El Paso and 1.26 goals for Lexington, totaling ~2.73 goals (calculated as average: El Paso attacking xG 1.57 vs. Lexington defensive xG 1.36; Lexington attacking xG 1.20 vs. El Paso defensive xG 1.31). El Paso averages 1.6 goals per game and produces 14.0 shots with 5.0 on target, while Lexington has 0.6 goals and 9.8 shots with 2.8 on target; with conversion rates of 11% versus 6% the home side clearly creates more chances. Both teams show a strong tendency for matches over 1.5 goals (seasonally 80% for both), which provides a very strong signal for Over 1.5 and aligns with the expected total of 2.73. Over 2.5 has limited but notable support – El Paso is over 2.5 in 80% of matches seasonally, Lexington 40% seasonally, but in the last 5 games both teams have Over 2.5 at 80%, so I rate Over 2.5 as a moderate 65%. Over 3.5 is less likely (seasonally 40% El Paso vs. 20% Lexington), therefore the best and strongest betting line appears to be Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1 (El Paso leads at half-time and wins) — I assess it at 28%. The main premises are the home side’s advantage: El Paso scores on average 1.6 goals per game versus 0.6 for Lexington, has higher xG 1.57 vs 1.20 and registers more shots (14.0 vs 9.8) and shots on target (5.0 vs 2.8) with better conversion 11% vs 6%. El Paso led at the break in 40% of matches and kept a clean sheet at half-time in 80% of those, and in the second half the hosts score on average 1.0 goal versus 0.2 for the visitors, which increases the chance of maintaining or extending the lead. Lexington has not won a match this season (0% wins) and concedes on average 1.6 goals per game, so scenarios with an away win at full-time are unlikely (1/2=4%, X/2=6%, 2/2=3%). Therefore, besides 1/1 the strongest alternatives are X/1 (20%) and X/X (14%), i.e. a draw at half-time turning into a home win or a final draw.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| El Paso Locomotive | Lexington | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
El Paso Locomotive is 102% better for: goals scored per match.
2.22 goals / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.1 goals / match - Lexington
Lexington is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.78 goals / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.4 goals / match - Lexington
El Paso Locomotive scores in 100% of matches (9 of 9 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).
Lexington scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while El Paso Locomotive keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - El Paso Locomotive
Over / Under - Lexington
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
El Paso Locomotive is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.2 pts / match - Lexington
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
El Paso Locomotive - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Lexington - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
El Paso Locomotive
Lexington
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| El Paso Locomotive | Liga | Lexington | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.00 | 2.72 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 78% | 54% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 53% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 28% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 67% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): El Paso Locomotive 2 - 0 - 0 Lexington. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington?
The USL Championship match finished El Paso Locomotive 1:4 Lexington. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between El Paso Locomotive and Lexington?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches El Paso Locomotive won 2, Lexington won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington?
El Paso Locomotive score 2.22 goals per game on average and Lexington 1.10. The USL Championship average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 78% of El Paso Locomotive's matches and 60% of Lexington's.
What form are El Paso Locomotive and Lexington in?
Over the last 5 games El Paso Locomotive have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Lexington 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


