United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 07 September 2026

El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington: match statistics

El Paso Locomotive crest
El Paso Locomotive
1 : 4half-time 0:2
Lexington crest
Lexington

El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

El Paso Locomotive played Lexington in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 31 May 2026. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

El Paso Locomotive: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Lexington: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

El Paso Locomotive scores 2.22 and concedes 1.78 goals per match. Lexington scores 1.10 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: El Paso Locomotive 78%, Lexington 60%. Over 2.5: El Paso Locomotive 100%, Lexington 60%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

El Paso Locomotive has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.39. El Paso Locomotive: 13.0 shots per match, Lexington: 11.9.

Match halves

El Paso Locomotive: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.89. Lexington: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

El Paso Locomotive: 46-60 (6 goals). Lexington: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

El Paso emerges as the favorite: at home they average 2.0 goals per match with 14.5 shots and 6 shots on target, and their home xG is 1.7 versus Lexington’s 1.2 xG on the road. The hosts have scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.4 points in that span; Lexington also averages 1.4 points over the last 5, but on the road they register only 0.6 goals per game on average and 0% away wins. El Paso’s defense is, however, vulnerable — at home they concede 2.75 goals per match on average and have no clean sheets (0%), which gives the visitors a chance. Lexington additionally has poor away efficiency: 6% shot conversion, an average of 2.8 shots on target and 40% of away matches without a goal. Considering the clearer chance-creation quality from the hosts (14.5 shots and 1.7 xG) and the visitors’ weak away form, I predict an El Paso victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS - Yes comes from both teams having season BTTS rates at 60% (El Paso 60% and Lexington 60%), with BTTS at 80% in the last 5 matches for each side. El Paso creates the most chances: averaging 1.6 goals per match, xG 1.57, 14.0 shots and 5.0 shots on target with an 11% conversion rate, increasing the likelihood the hosts will score. Lexington has only 0.6 goals per match and a 6% conversion rate on the season, but scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 avg) and also recorded 80% BTTS, so the visitors have recently been able to reply with goals. Defensively both teams are prone to conceding: El Paso concedes 1.2 goals on the season (1.8 in the last 5), and Lexington concedes 1.6 goals both on the season and in the last 5, while the league BTTS is 56% with an average goals of 2.79, all of which supports an exchange of goals. On this basis I select BTTS = yes with an estimated probability of 80% versus 20% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

A model based on average xG and opponent defense indicates about 1.47 goals for El Paso and 1.26 goals for Lexington, totaling ~2.73 goals (calculated as average: El Paso attacking xG 1.57 vs. Lexington defensive xG 1.36; Lexington attacking xG 1.20 vs. El Paso defensive xG 1.31). El Paso averages 1.6 goals per game and produces 14.0 shots with 5.0 on target, while Lexington has 0.6 goals and 9.8 shots with 2.8 on target; with conversion rates of 11% versus 6% the home side clearly creates more chances. Both teams show a strong tendency for matches over 1.5 goals (seasonally 80% for both), which provides a very strong signal for Over 1.5 and aligns with the expected total of 2.73. Over 2.5 has limited but notable support – El Paso is over 2.5 in 80% of matches seasonally, Lexington 40% seasonally, but in the last 5 games both teams have Over 2.5 at 80%, so I rate Over 2.5 as a moderate 65%. Over 3.5 is less likely (seasonally 40% El Paso vs. 20% Lexington), therefore the best and strongest betting line appears to be Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 1/1 (El Paso leads at half-time and wins) — I assess it at 28%. The main premises are the home side’s advantage: El Paso scores on average 1.6 goals per game versus 0.6 for Lexington, has higher xG 1.57 vs 1.20 and registers more shots (14.0 vs 9.8) and shots on target (5.0 vs 2.8) with better conversion 11% vs 6%. El Paso led at the break in 40% of matches and kept a clean sheet at half-time in 80% of those, and in the second half the hosts score on average 1.0 goal versus 0.2 for the visitors, which increases the chance of maintaining or extending the lead. Lexington has not won a match this season (0% wins) and concedes on average 1.6 goals per game, so scenarios with an away win at full-time are unlikely (1/2=4%, X/2=6%, 2/2=3%). Therefore, besides 1/1 the strongest alternatives are X/1 (20%) and X/X (14%), i.e. a draw at half-time turning into a home win or a final draw.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
8Shots22
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1Shots on target8
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
0.8xG2.38
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
3Corners7
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
30Dangerous attacks61
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
12Fouls15
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
5Cards2
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

El Paso LocomotiveLexington
2.22Goals scored / match1.1
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1.78Goals conceded / match1.4
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
49%Average possession52%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
5.44Shots on target / match4
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match11.9
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
5.44Shots on target4
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
17.1%Shot conversion9.2%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
49%Possession52%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1.54xG for1.39
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1.43xG against1.35
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

Shooting quality

El Paso Locomotive: Efficient finishingLexington: Balanced
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
Accuracy (shots on target)42%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

El Paso Locomotive
WLLDL
Season result split
44% W22% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-3
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 at home
1-1-2
DWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Lexington
LDLWL
Season result split
20% W30% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-5
0.90 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

El Paso Locomotive is 102% better for: goals scored per match.

2.22 goals / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.1 goals / match - Lexington

Lexington is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.78 goals / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.4 goals / match - Lexington

El Paso Locomotive scoring profile: very strong

El Paso Locomotive scores in 100% of matches (9 of 9 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

Lexington scoring profile: very strong

Lexington scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while El Paso Locomotive keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).

20Goals scored (season)11
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
16Goals conceded (season)14
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
4Average goals in match2.5
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
10Goals scored (last 5)6
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
11Goals conceded (last 5)9
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal70%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
78%2 goals20%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
33%3 goals20%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
11%4 goals0%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal70%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
67%2 goals50%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
22%3 goals20%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
11%4 goals0%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

78%
El Paso Locomotive - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 9 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

56%BTTS at half-time10%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
33%BTTS in both halves0%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
67%Scored in both halves10%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

BTTS and goal count

78%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
80%BTTS - last 580%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
78%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
44%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

El Paso Locomotive is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.2 pts / match - Lexington

El Paso Locomotive - half-time state
44% leading22% draw33% trailing
Lexington - half-time state
30% leading30% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.2
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1.33Goals scored (1st half)0.5
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
2.22Average goals (1st half)1.1
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
33%Clean sheet before half-time60%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
11%No goal before half-time60%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)0.8
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1.78Average goals (2nd half)1.4
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
33%Clean sheet after half-time40%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
22%No goal after half-time60%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

El Paso Locomotive - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
14
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lexington - second-half results

10% W50% R40% P
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

El Paso Locomotive - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match2.41.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
Lexington - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

El Paso Locomotive
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
4
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
6
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Lexington
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
4
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
119%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

El Paso Locomotive

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
156%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

Lexington

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

El Paso LocomotiveLigaLexington
Average goals in match 4.002.72 2.50
Both teams scored 78%54% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%53% 60%
Clean sheets 22%28% 30%
Goal before half-time 100%67% 70%
Goal after half-time 100%80% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. El Paso LocomotiveGoalÁlvaro Quezada
  2. El Paso LocomotiveRed cardDiego Abitia
  3. El Paso LocomotiveSubstitutionOn: Rubio Yovani Mu00e9ndez RubinOff: Álvaro Quezada
  4. LexingtonGoalMarcus EppsAssist: Elio Nicolas Firmino
  5. El Paso LocomotiveSubstitutionOn: Amando Miguel MorenoOff: Gabriel Torres
  6. El Paso LocomotiveYellow cardKofi Twumasi
  7. El Paso LocomotiveRed cardRobert Coronado
  8. LexingtonGoalPhillip GoodrumAssist: Aaron Molloy
  9. LexingtonYellow cardPhillip Goodrum
  10. El Paso LocomotiveSubstitutionOn: Antony AlfaroOff: Kofi Twumasi
  11. LexingtonYellow cardArturo Osuna Ordoñez
  12. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Tarik ScottOff: Latif Blessing
  13. LexingtonGoalTarik Scott
  14. El Paso LocomotiveGoalRubio Yovani Mu00e9ndez Rubin

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): El Paso Locomotive 2 - 0 - 0 Lexington. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Lexington SC
1 : 2
El Paso Locomotive FC
El Paso Locomotive FC
2 : 1
Lexington SC

FAQ

What was the result of El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington?

The USL Championship match finished El Paso Locomotive 1:4 Lexington. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between El Paso Locomotive and Lexington?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches El Paso Locomotive won 2, Lexington won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington?

El Paso Locomotive score 2.22 goals per game on average and Lexington 1.10. The USL Championship average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 78% of El Paso Locomotive's matches and 60% of Lexington's.

What form are El Paso Locomotive and Lexington in?

Over the last 5 games El Paso Locomotive have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Lexington 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.