El Paso Locomotive vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: match statistics
El Paso Locomotive vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
El Paso Locomotive played Pittsburgh Riverhounds in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 27 August 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
El Paso Locomotive: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
El Paso Locomotive scores 1.67 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.27 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: El Paso Locomotive 73%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%. Over 2.5: El Paso Locomotive 73%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
El Paso Locomotive has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.24. El Paso Locomotive: 11.2 shots per match, Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 9.7.
Match halves
El Paso Locomotive: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.87.
Goals by minute
El Paso Locomotive: 46-60 (8 goals). Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
El Paso Locomotive come into this match after winning 4 of their last 5 fixtures, scoring 7 goals and conceding just 2 in that period. Pittsburgh Riverhounds have also put together a solid run (3 wins, a draw and a defeat), but they have scored only 5 goals in their last five matches. The hosts create significantly more danger at home, averaging 14.11 shots and 5.33 shots on target per match, with an xG of 1.63, while the visitors average 8 shots, 3 on target and an xG of 1.06 away from home. Pittsburgh’s away defensive numbers are stronger, as they concede an average of 1.10 goals and keep a clean sheet in 40% of matches, but they fail to score in as many as 30% of those fixtures. El Paso have maintained their attacking efficiency at home, scoring in every home match, so the superior quality of chances created and excellent current form give the hosts a slight edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have notably low seasonal BTTS figures: El Paso at 36% and Pittsburgh at 40%, compared with the league average of 53%. Recent form supports the scenario in which at least one side fails to score even more strongly, as El Paso recorded BTTS in 0% of its last five matches, while Pittsburgh did so in just 20%. The defenses have been very solid lately: each team conceded only 2 goals in five matches, averaging 0.4 per game. Pittsburgh kept a clean sheet in 40% of its matches this season, while its average goals scored stands at only 1.0, limiting the visitors’ chances of breaking through the hosts’ well-organized defense. El Paso creates more, with an average xG of 1.31 and 3.82 shots on target per match compared with Pittsburgh’s 1.06 xG and 3.0 shots on target, but this does not change the strong signal for BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The profile of both teams points to a tight match with a limited number of chances: El Paso score an average of 1.27 goals, while Pittsburgh average 1.00 goal per game. The hosts concede just 0.91 goals per match, whereas the visitors have kept a clean sheet in 40% of their appearances, limiting the likelihood of a high-scoring game. In their last five matches, each team conceded just 2 goals, averaging 0.4 per game, while matches featuring Over 2.5 goals occurred in only 20% of cases for both sides. Additionally, 73% of El Paso’s matches and as many as 90% of Pittsburgh’s fixtures ended with no more than three goals, making Under 3.5 the market best supported by the data.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is El Paso leading at the break and the home side securing victory, as they have won the first half in 80% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 1.2 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.2. During the same period, Pittsburgh held a half-time lead in 40% of matches, while across the entire season they went into the break trailing in as many as 40% of games. El Paso also have the stronger overall season record: they win 55% of their matches compared with 40% for their opponents, scoring an average of 1.27 goals and conceding 0.91, while the visitors record figures of 1.00 and 1.10 respectively. The home side’s advantage in the quality of chances created is also reflected in the xG figures, standing at 1.31 compared with Pittsburgh’s 1.06, as well as in the average number of shots on target: 3.82 versus 3.00. A half-time draw remains a significant alternative, as El Paso were level after 45 minutes in 64% of their league matches, but their very strong recent form in opening periods supports the 1/1 HT/FT outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| El Paso Locomotive | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.4 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
El Paso Locomotive is 31% better for: goals scored per match.
1.67 goals / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.27 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.2 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
El Paso Locomotive scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while El Paso Locomotive keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - El Paso Locomotive
Over / Under - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
El Paso Locomotive is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.27 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
El Paso Locomotive - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
El Paso Locomotive
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| El Paso Locomotive | Liga | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.33 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 73% | 58% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 73% | 52% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 26% | • 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 87% | 67% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 80% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: El Paso Locomotive 0 - 0 - 1 Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of El Paso Locomotive vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?
The USL Championship match finished El Paso Locomotive 2:1 Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before El Paso Locomotive vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?
El Paso Locomotive score 1.67 goals per game on average and Pittsburgh Riverhounds 1.27. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 73% of El Paso Locomotive's matches and 47% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's.
What form are El Paso Locomotive and Pittsburgh Riverhounds in?
Over the last 5 games El Paso Locomotive have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Pittsburgh Riverhounds 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for El Paso Locomotive vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


