Elana Toruń vs Lipno Stęszew: match statistics
Elana Toruń vs Lipno Stęszew: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Elana Toruń played Lipno Stęszew in 3 Liga Group 2 (Poland). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Elana Toruń: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Lipno Stęszew: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Elana Toruń scores 1.68 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Lipno Stęszew scores 1.32 and concedes 1.68. League average: 2.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Elana Toruń 52%, Lipno Stęszew 56%. Over 2.5: Elana Toruń 56%, Lipno Stęszew 52%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Elana Toruń has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.39. Elana Toruń: 11.0 shots per match, Lipno Stęszew: 8.3.
Match halves
Elana Toruń: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.80. Lipno Stęszew: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Elana Toruń: 76-90+ (10 goals). Lipno Stęszew: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 2: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Elana Toruń has a clear statistical edge: they have scored 42 goals this season versus Lipno’s 33 and conceded 29 compared to the visitors’ 42. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 11 goals and average 2.0 points per game, while Lipno has 6 goals and only 0.4 points per game in that period. At home Elana averages 1.73 goals scored and concedes 1.36 per match, whereas Lipno away averages 1.33 scored and 2.17 conceded, indicating a weaker away defence. Quality-of-chances analysis confirms the hosts’ advantage: average xG for Elana is 1.9 versus Lipno’s 1.39, and xG against is 1.08 vs 1.87; the hosts also produce more shots (16.2 vs 11.33) and more shots on target (5.8 vs 4.67). The only risk is Elana’s slightly lower efficiency (conversion rate 11% vs Lipno’s 13%), but a higher clean sheet percentage (27% vs 8%) and the fact that the hosts have 3 wins in the last 5 matches versus Lipno’s 0 wins point towards backing an Elana victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long metrics show Elana scores 1.31 and concedes 1.23 per match, while Lipno scores 1.33 and concedes 2.17; season BTTS rates are 46% for Elana and 67% for Lipno. In the last 5 matches Elana had BTTS in 60% of games, and Lipno in all 5 (100%), which is a strong short-term signal in favor of a both teams to score scenario. Additionally, Lipno has only 8% of matches without conceding versus 38% for Elana, and Lipno’s high average conceded 2.17 goals per match indicates opponents regularly find the net. Attacking xG is similar: 1.40 for Elana and 1.39 for Lipno, and average shots on target 4.1 vs 4.67 confirm both teams create scoring opportunities. Considering seasonal and short-term trends (BTTS 46%/67%, last 5 matches 60%/100%, Lipno’s low clean sheet rate 8% and 2.17 average goals conceded), I favor the 'BTTS - Yes' scenario and estimate probability at 78% versus 22% for No BTTS.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect 1.64 goals for Elana and 1.46 for Lipno (total 3.10), calculated as the average of attack and defense: Elana’s attacking xG 1.40 versus Lipno’s xG conceded 1.87 gives ~1.64 for the home side, while Lipno’s attacking xG 1.39 against xG conceded by Elana 1.53 yields ~1.46 for the away side. In the last 5 matches Elana averaged 2.2 goals, Lipno 1.2 (combined 3.4), and recent xG 1.54 vs 1.19 confirm the home side’s increased offensive potential. Season stats show Over 1.5 in 69% of Elana’s matches and 100% of Lipno’s, so I assess Over 1.5 probability at 88% vs 12% for Under. Signals for the 2.5 line are mixed: seasonally Elana has 38% of games over 2.5, Lipno 67%, but in the last 5 matches both teams recorded 60% of games over 2.5, hence Over 2.5 around 60%. I rate Over 3.5 lower at about 35%, since season percentages are 31% for Elana and 50% for Lipno, and goal averages and xG suggest a distribution around 3–3.5 goals rather than four or more. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (selection: Over at 1.5), as the expected 3.10 goals, recent 3.4 average and 69% vs 100% for Over1.5 provide a clear edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Elana Toruń is showing clearly superior form: over the last 5 matches the home side average 2.0 points per game versus Lipno’s 0.4, and have won 60% of those fixtures while the visitors have no wins (0%). At half-time Elana led in 60% of their last 5 matches and score an average of 1.0 goals by the break versus 0.6 for their opponents, which strongly supports a home lead at HT. In the second half Lipno concedes on average 1.55 goals after the break and have a negative second-half goal difference (-10), whereas Elana concedes only 0.54 and have a positive second-half difference (+1), so the hosts are more likely to hold the lead and win. On that basis the most probable scenario is 1/1 (Elana leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time) at approximately 45%, alternatively a draw at the break and a home win (X/1) is possible at about 20%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Elana Toruń | Lipno Stęszew | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Elana Toruń is 400% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Elana Toruń · 0.4 pts / match - Lipno Stęszew
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Elana Toruń is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.68 goals / match - Elana Toruń · 1.32 goals / match - Lipno Stęszew
Elana Toruń is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.16 goals / match - Elana Toruń · 1.68 goals / match - Lipno Stęszew
Elana Toruń scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Lipno Stęszew keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).
Lipno Stęszew scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Elana Toruń keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Elana Toruń
Over / Under - Lipno Stęszew
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Elana Toruń is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.76 pts / match - Elana Toruń · 1.48 pts / match - Lipno Stęszew
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Elana Toruń - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Lipno Stęszew - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 36%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Elana Toruń
Lipno Stęszew
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 2).
Teams vs league
| Elana Toruń | Liga | Lipno Stęszew | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.84 | 2.93 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | • 52% | 51% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 56% | 56% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 28% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 70% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 72% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Elana ToruńGoalOskar Sikorski
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Elana Toruń 0 - 1 - 0 Lipno Stęszew. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Elana Toruń vs Lipno Stęszew?
The 3 Liga Group 2 match finished Elana Toruń 1:1 Lipno Stęszew. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Elana Toruń vs Lipno Stęszew?
Elana Toruń score 1.68 goals per game on average and Lipno Stęszew 1.32. The 3 Liga Group 2 average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Elana Toruń's matches and 56% of Lipno Stęszew's.
What form are Elana Toruń and Lipno Stęszew in?
Over the last 5 games Elana Toruń have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Lipno Stęszew 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Elana Toruń vs Lipno Stęszew?
The statistical background for Elana Toruń vs Lipno Stęszew — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


